|
Home > Archive > Xbox forum > May 2005 > Xbox1 vs Xbox2 comparison
You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread.
To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to
this thread please [click here]
| Author |
Xbox1 vs Xbox2 comparison
|
|
|
|
|
|
<'360> wrote in message news:v6mdnckdyIMlOhnfRVn-gw@comcast.com...
quote:
> spec comparison of Xbox to Xbox 360.
>
> http://www.kotaku.com/gaming/images...ide-by-Side.doc
Never click links to *.doc files - the script kiddies have just too much fun
with office...
Well, not unless you use something safe to open them (wordpad, Open Office,
but not word, etc.)
| |
|
|
"xTenn" <xTennRemovePart@tds.net> wrote in message
news:%23NlSDf%23VFHA.1040@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl...
quote:
>
> <'360> wrote in message news:v6mdnckdyIMlOhnfRVn-gw@comcast.com...
>
>
> Never click links to *.doc files - the script kiddies have just too much
> fun with office...
>
> Well, not unless you use something safe to open them (wordpad, Open
> Office, but not word, etc.)
>
I'm not a script kiddie...oh you wouldnt know that... well here, i found an
image of the same thing
(i think it's the same)
http://mars.walagata.com/w/amir0x/XBX360SpecSheet.jpg
| |
| Andrew Ryan Chang 2005-05-14, 6:40 am |
| In article <NIidnatzsuHg4xjfRVn-hg@comcast.com>, <'360> wrote:
quote:
>
>I'm not a script kiddie...oh you wouldnt know that... well here, i found an
You're a major league chump -- in fact, possibly a record holder
of chumpitude -- who doesn't understand most of the semi-technical details
you spam everywhere. No, you didn't provide the Word doc; your copyright
violation to original material ratio told us that already. But as you are
a complete and utter fool, it would surprise no one if you in your idiocy
passed on a compromised Word doc.
followups to rgv.advocacy
--
For certain purposes it's not too misleading to call our system democracy
or capitalism or -- better still -- industrialism, but its real names are
factory fascism and office oligarchy. Anybody who says these people are
"free" is lying or stupid. -- "THE ABOLITION OF WORK" by Bob Black
| |
|
| > Never click links to *.doc files - the script kiddies have just too much
quote:
> fun with office...
-Word won't run any macros etc automatically, and the newer versions of
Office won't run them at all by default.
Of course if you're using Office 95 or something ancient like that it's
another deal...
| |
| Arthur Hagen 2005-05-15, 12:31 am |
| msgs <mikael.sillman@ppPOISTA.inet.fi> wrote:
quote:
>
> -Word won't run any macros etc automatically, and the newer versions
> of Office won't run them at all by default.
Not only that, but you can't draw conclusions based on the "extension",
since the Web didn't originate in the Microsoft world, and thus doesn't
understand extensions. There's nothing that prevents a web server from
serving you a Word document named foo.xyz (or even foo.jpg) with the mime
type application/ms-word.
Vice versa, a *.doc file might just as well be an image or html. If you
don't trust the web server in the first place, trusting the "extensions" is
rather silly :-)
--
*Art
| |
|
|
<'360> wrote in message news:NIidnatzsuHg4xjfRVn-hg@comcast.com...
quote:
>
> I'm not a script kiddie...oh you wouldnt know that... well here, i found
> an image of the same thing
> (i think it's the same)
> http://mars.walagata.com/w/amir0x/XBX360SpecSheet.jpg
Cool, that's better. 
| |
|
|
"Arthur Hagen" <art@broomstick.com> wrote in message
news:d6637p$2an$1@cauldron.broomstick.com...
quote:
> msgs <mikael.sillman@ppPOISTA.inet.fi> wrote:
>
> Not only that, but you can't draw conclusions based on the "extension",
> since the Web didn't originate in the Microsoft world, and thus doesn't
> understand extensions. There's nothing that prevents a web server from
> serving you a Word document named foo.xyz (or even foo.jpg) with the mime
> type application/ms-word.
> Vice versa, a *.doc file might just as well be an image or html. If you
> don't trust the web server in the first place, trusting the "extensions"
> is
> rather silly :-)
>
There are many different kinds of doc files, true enough, but then there are
more types of EXE as well, and I would not suggest running any of those
either...
So far images are fairly safe (outside of possibly being used to ID your
computer and more by being in your cache), but embedded tags are becoming
more robust with each generation...
|
| |
|
|