quote:

---

> http://www.scei.co.jp/corporate/rel...df/041129ae.pdf
>
> http://www.scei.co.jp/corporate/rel...df/041129be.pdf
>
> Wow.
>
> Dumping the piece of crap x86 Intel chip for the PPC was a good move for
> Microsoft but they just got blown out of the game. Cell has turned out
> to be everything IBM and Sony planned for it to be.
>
> Wow.

quote:

---

>
>

quote:

---

>
> "Railgunner" <none@none.org> wrote in message
> news:none-F75387.01210329112004@newssvr13-ext.news.prodigy.com...
>
> Do you prefer the label Zealot, Troll or Rabid Fanboy?
>
>

quote:

---

>
> Do you prefer the label Zealot, Troll or Rabid Fanboy?

quote:

---

> http://www.scei.co.jp/corporate/rel...df/041129ae.pdf
>
> http://www.scei.co.jp/corporate/rel...df/041129be.pdf
>
> Wow.
>
> Dumping the piece of crap x86 Intel chip for the PPC was a good move for
> Microsoft but they just got blown out of the game. Cell has turned out
> to be everything IBM and Sony planned for it to be.
>
> Wow.

quote:

---

> "Railgunner" <none@none.org> wrote in message
> news:none-F75387.01210329112004@newssvr13-ext.news.prodigy.com...
>
> Hardware specs are only half of the story. The Saturn was a heck of a system
> on paper, but it was notoriously difficult to program for. Factor in that MS
> is easier to deal with than Sony(so sayeth Tecmo) and it should be real
> interesting.

quote:

---

>
> "Railgunner" <none@none.org> wrote in message
> news:none-F75387.01210329112004@newssvr13-ext.news.prodigy.com...
>
> Do you prefer the label Zealot, Troll or Rabid Fanboy?

quote:

---

> Factor in that MS
> is easier to deal with than Sony(so sayeth Tecmo) and it should be real
> interesting.

quote:

---

> In article <2fEqd.100424$6w6.52500@tornado.tampabay.rr.com>,
> "Gooserider" <noway@mousepotato.com> wrote:
>
for[vbcol=seagreen]
system[vbcol=seagreen]
that MS[vbcol=seagreen]
>
> Oh god! What a sad little fanboy.

quote:

---

> "steeler" <nospam@nomail.com> wrote in message
> news:41aaf5b8$0$19162$cc9e4d1f@news-text.dial.pipex.com...
>
> Well at least now we know why he was relentlessly bashing Halo II when it's
> obvious he has never played the game.
> He is all of the above and another few choice words tah boot

quote:

---

> In article <u4adnbNsAdY0jjbcRVn-uw@suscom.com>, "dementia" <bkr.me@u>
> wrote:
>
for[vbcol=seagreen]
out[vbcol=seagreen]
it's[vbcol=seagreen]
>
> Yeah, no one else is slamming that over-hyped mission pack called Halo
> 2...
>
> What a dimwitted little pussy.

quote:

---

> obvious he has never played the game.

quote:

---

> steeler wrote:
>
> I've never understood this need to evangelize whatever machine they've
> either bought, or got their hearts set on. It's not as if they had
> anything to do with the design or build of the thing, yet you're bound
> to hear something like "I'm the proud owner of XYZ". WTF are they proud
> of? They're only the punter who coughed up the cash for the thing,
> nothing more. Muppets, the lot of 'em, no matter what machine they
> own/want.
>
> Regards
>
> Mark

quote:

---

>
> "Railgunner" <none@none.org> wrote in message
> news:none-05D5B1.04162429112004@newssvr13-ext.news.prodigy.com...
> for
out[vbcol=seagreen]
> system
> that MS
real[vbcol=seagreen]
>
> Heloooo Mr. Pot
> I'd like to introduce you tah Mr. Kettle
> Mr. Kettle, Mr. Pot
> Carry on boys
>
>

quote:

---

> Yeah, no one else is slamming that over-hyped mission pack
> called Halo
> 2...

quote:

---

> What a dimwitted little pussy.

quote:

---

>
> "dementia" <bkr.me@u> wrote in message
> news:NqidnW5xi8p6iDbcRVn-vg@suscom.com...
> out
> real
>
> I am trying to work out if he is actually a clever little
> troll and meant
> the irony in that post. I am guessing not ;-)

quote:

---

>http://www.scei.co.jp/corporate/rel...df/041129ae.pdf
>
>http://www.scei.co.jp/corporate/rel...df/041129be.pdf
>
>Wow.
>
>Dumping the piece of crap x86 Intel chip for the PPC was a good move for
>Microsoft but they just got blown out of the game. Cell has turned out
>to be everything IBM and Sony planned for it to be.
>
>Wow.

quote:

---

> http://www.scei.co.jp/corporate/rel...df/041129ae.pdf
>
> http://www.scei.co.jp/corporate/rel...df/041129be.pdf
>
> Wow.
>
> Dumping the piece of crap x86 Intel chip for the PPC was a good move for
> Microsoft but they just got blown out of the game. Cell has turned out
> to be everything IBM and Sony planned for it to be.
>
> Wow.

quote:

---

> On Mon, 29 Nov 2004 09:21:03 GMT, Railgunner <none@none.org> wrote:
>
>
>
> I would stay away from the stock market if a press release is that
> exciting for you. Of course you sound like you are 13 so you have
> plenty of time to learn if you pay attention in your economics class.
>
> Adam M

quote:

---

> In article <2fEqd.100424$6w6.52500@tornado.tampabay.rr.com>,
> "Gooserider" <noway@mousepotato.com> wrote:
>
>
> Oh god! What a sad little fanboy.

quote:

---

> I am trying to work out if he is actually a clever little troll and meant
> the irony in that post. I am guessing not ;-)

quote:

---

> http://www.scei.co.jp/corporate/rel...df/041129ae.pdf
>
> http://www.scei.co.jp/corporate/rel...df/041129be.pdf
>
> Wow.
>
> Dumping the piece of crap x86 Intel chip for the PPC was a good move for
> Microsoft but they just got blown out of the game. Cell has turned out
> to be everything IBM and Sony planned for it to be.
>
> Wow.

quote:

---

> Dumping the piece of crap x86 Intel chip for the PPC was a good move
> for Microsoft but they just got blown out of the game. Cell has
> turned out to be everything IBM and Sony planned for it to be.

quote:

---

> http://www.scei.co.jp/corporate/rel...df/041129ae.pdf
>
> http://www.scei.co.jp/corporate/rel...df/041129be.pdf
>
> Wow.
>
> Dumping the piece of crap x86 Intel chip for the PPC was a good move for
> Microsoft but they just got blown out of the game. Cell has turned out
> to be everything IBM and Sony planned for it to be.
>
> Wow.

quote:

---

> http://www.scei.co.jp/corporate/rel...df/041129ae.pdf
>
> http://www.scei.co.jp/corporate/rel...df/041129be.pdf
>
> Wow.
>
> Dumping the piece of crap x86 Intel chip for the PPC was a good move for
> Microsoft but they just got blown out of the game. Cell has turned out
> to be everything IBM and Sony planned for it to be.
>

quote:

---

>http://www.scei.co.jp/corporate/rel...df/041129ae.pdf
>
>http://www.scei.co.jp/corporate/rel...df/041129be.pdf
>
>Wow.
>
>Dumping the piece of crap x86 Intel chip for the PPC was a good move for
>Microsoft but they just got blown out of the game. Cell has turned out
>to be everything IBM and Sony planned for it to be.
>
>Wow.

quote:

---

> Seriously, I don't give a crap about what platform has the best graphics,
> I'm in it for the quality of gameplay. The minute we place a higher
> priority on graphics over gameplay is the minute we condemn ourselves to a
> crappy gaming experience.

quote:

---

> either bought, or got their hearts set on. It's not as if they had
> anything to do with the design or build of the thing, yet you're bound
> to hear something like "I'm the proud owner of XYZ". WTF are they proud
> of? They're only the punter who coughed up the cash for the thing,
> nothing more. Muppets, the lot of 'em, no matter what machine they
> own/want.
>
> Regards
>
> Mark

quote:

---

> "steeler" <nospam@nomail.com> wrote in message
> news:41ab211b$0$16583$cc9e4d1f@news-text.dial.pipex.com...
>
>
>
> Indeed, didn't come across with enough spittle. Well that
> and frankly it smelt so bad the links weren't worth the
> effort.
>

quote:

---

> Keith Schiffner wrote:
>
>
> Want me to spit on the screen for you Keith? :-)
>

quote:

---

>
> "NightSky 421" <nightsky421@yahoo.ca> wrote in message
> news:10qmkcv4uunm68d@corp.supernews.com...
>
>
>
> I am so sick of PS2 and Gamecube fanatics saying 'graphics' aren't
> important and Xbox fans that say graphics are the most important. Come on
> folks - great graphics neither add to or take away from gameplay but they
> are part of the overall gaming experience. Gameplay is most important,
> followed by sound (for me at least) and then graphics. Unfortunately, it
> is rare to have a game excel in all three areas.
>
> To the PS2 fans : No, it's not about the graphics BUT good graphics do not
> make a game bad
> To the Xbox fans: Yes, good graphics are a plus but they do NOT make the
> game
> To the Gamecube fans: Yes, gameplay is the most important part of a game
> but it does not mean a game can't have both good gameplay and graphics
>

quote:

---

>
>Quite. The processor in the PS3 might be great but the Sega Saturn was much
>more powerful than the PS1 and the rest is history.
>
>
>
>

quote:

---

>
> Oh Duh! What's your gamertag?
> Add me to your friends.
> Mine's Daytona 955i

quote:

---

> Do you prefer the label Zealot, Troll or Rabid Fanboy?

quote:

---

> steeler wrote:
>
> You have nfi what you're talking about. Sega Saturn used multiple 16 bit
> processors. PS1 used a 32 bit processor and had a more powerful 3d gfx
> unit.

quote:

---

> zeus wrote:
>
>
>
> http://users4.ev1.net/%7Esheath/Con...tm#Saturnandps1

quote:

---

> Hardware specs are only half of the story. The Saturn was a heck of a system
> on paper, but it was notoriously difficult to program for. Factor in that MS
> is easier to deal with than Sony(so sayeth Tecmo) and it should be real
> interesting.

quote:

---

> In article <wPNqd.9133$xk5.1900@trnddc09>,
> Scott H <sheathx013@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>
> Ok, you posted a link to a hideous eyesore of a fanboy site. What was
> the point?

quote:

---

> "Railgunner" <none@none.org> wrote in message
> news:none-A3E0FA.16103429112004@newssvr13-ext.news.prodigy.com...
>
> It's pretty clear to see who and what he was responding to. You are pretty
> dumb Railbummer. Asking questions like that in your last post really does
> indicate you don't know what you're saying. Hmmm sounds like you could be
> president. Railasser for president.

quote:

---

> You're just another worthless Usenet dimwit
> attempting to flame a *veteran console developer.*

quote:

---

> You're just another worthless
> Usenet dimwit attempting to flame a veteran console developer.

quote:

---

> "Railgunner" <none@none.org> wrote in message
> news:none-A3E0FA.16103429112004@newssvr13-ext.news.prodigy.com...
>
>
>
> It's pretty clear to see who and what he was responding to. You are pretty
> dumb Railbummer. Asking questions like that in your last post really does
> indicate you don't know what you're saying. Hmmm sounds like you could be
> president. Railasser for president.

quote:

---

> Dumping the piece of crap x86 Intel chip for the PPC was a good move for
> Microsoft but they just got blown out of the game. Cell has turned out
> to be everything IBM and Sony planned for it to be.

quote:

---

>-----Original Message-----
>"Railgunner" <none@none.org> wrote in message
>news:none-F75387.01210329112004@newssvr13-

quote:

---

was a good move for[vbcol=seagreen]
has turned out[vbcol=seagreen]
>
>
>Seriously, I don't give a crap about what platform has

quote:

---

>I'm in it for the quality of gameplay. The minute we

quote:

---

>priority on graphics over gameplay is the minute we

quote:

---

>crappy gaming experience.
>
>
>.
>

quote:

---

> In alt.games.video.sony-playstation2 Gooserider <noway@mousepotato.com>
> wrote:
>
>
> Yeah, because we all know how important doa TITleS are for Xbox gamers.
>
> Not a slam against DOA, but come on Tecmo, let's see them do something
> besides milk that franchise. Either that, or they should just milk it
> harder - like DOA:xXx Modeling (otherwise known as the "We all know why
> you're *really* buying this" game) Characters participate in various
> modeling
> "games" that use a DDR-esque interface. (Left, A, Right, A, Jump Jump
> Jump!
> *click*) Play as either the model or the cameraman, as you unlock
> additional walkways, costumes, accessories, and camera lenses. See if you
> can unlock the special hidden Wet T-shirt Modeling mini-game!

quote:

---

> Jeez - give me a break, the game is fun and all the emphasis on the female
> characters is just stupid. It's a decent fighting game with characters that
> really control differently. It's easy enough for a newbie to play and enjoy
> and if you take the time to learn the 70 or so moves for each character you
> can do some really cool combos.

quote:

---

> ...and if you want to sleeze it up - please equal time for male and female
> characters - maybe a wet shorts contest?

quote:

---

> In article <20Qqd.12894$cE3.12850@clgrps12>,
> "Union Kane" <union_kane_03_nospam@telus.net> wrote:
>
>
> Let me get this straight sport...some clown posts a link to some hideous
> fanboy website in an attempt to prove a technical point and you see
> nothing inane about that. You're just another worthless Usenet dimwit
> attempting to flame a veteran console developer. Give it a rest dunce.

quote:

---

>
> Let me get this straight sport...some clown posts a link to some hideous
> fanboy website in an attempt to prove a technical point and you see
> nothing inane about that. You're just another worthless Usenet dimwit
> attempting to flame a veteran console developer. Give it a rest dunce.

quote:

---

>
>
> Railasser, you idiot of the year. Despite what you think of the web page he
> linked, the fact still remains that the info on that page was relevant to
> the topic and helped prove someone else's point. Had you said, "that web
> page makes a good point, but does it ever look home made," I would have
> agreed with you. You flamed him for making the post entirely. Releaser,
> you idiot of the year.

quote:

---

>In article <jecmq0pvm6j1kblp6mj56qncg8ijuoplrg@4ax.com>,
> AM_Dragon <am_dragon@newsguy.com> wrote:
>
>
>Bzzt!
>
>Sorry dimwit, I've been following Cell's development with every IBM and
>Sony patent submission for the last couple of years while work at home
>on console games. It won't be long until I get my hands on one of the
>early Cell workstations.

quote:

---

>The nice thing about working at home is there is always time to play
>flame the idiot fanboys, fanboys just like you dummy.

quote:

---

>Come on dimwit, let's hear your assessment of the Cell family of chips
>and their impact on the console market! Or are you just another
>forgettable waste of space punk?

quote:

---

> Soul Calibur 2 blows a half monkey half goats XXX

quote:

---

> The game is lame. (there is a reason why a game drops to $20 and becomes a
> platinum hit in less than a year.)

quote:

---

> I believe it was Talim? (little chick with the tonfas?) all you had to do
> was hit horizontal attack twice and then vertical attack (not sure if the
> last hit required a tap or tap and hold forwards) over and over again on any
> difficulty setting and you could beat 90% of the computer opponents in the
> quest mode and 98% of them in the regular "arcade" mode. Hwang (or what
> ever the Elvis impersonator) had a very similar combo too.

quote:

---

> In alt.games.video.sony-playstation2 finndo <finndo@sc.rr.com> wrote:
>
>
> Yeah - it sells enough copies, and is re-released as a greatest
> hit/platinum title/whatever.
>
>
> Did you try upping the difficulty?
>
> Did you try playing your friends?
>
> Sure, set the game on "easy" and what do you know? The game's
> like...easy.
>