| Dan White 2007-01-30, 8:03 pm |
| "GMAN" <glenzabr@nospam.xmission.com> wrote in message
news:ejvmef$777$1@news.xmission.com...
quote:
> In article <erKFZxhCHHA.3620@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl>, "David Parkes"
> <wibble@wobble.com> wrote:
>
> Although its cool that you have such a long time to take back stuff at the
> stores there in the UK, but I will never understand the logic your
> lawmakers
> use to make it the responsibility of the stores to take back and eat the
> cost
> of the sale when an item becomes defective. Its the manufacturer who made
> the
> crappy or defective device, the store just sells the damn thing.
>
> xplain it to me ????
Because the store then gets a credit from the manufacturer. The purpose of
the consumer protection laws is to make life easier for the consumer, not
the seller or manufacturer. If they want less hassle, make more reliable
products. Simple.
--
Dan White
(dan@finex666.org.uk)
Perform an exorcism when replying.
|