Home > Archive > Xbox Live > June 2005 > Xbox 360 emulation of Xbox games, and price





You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread. To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to this thread please [click here]

Author Xbox 360 emulation of Xbox games, and price

2005-06-06, 12:30 am

Microsoft Press Briefing

"The most important announcement at this event was the demonstration of the
Xbox 360, planned for release this holiday season. Company management stated
that the Xbox 360 would be backward compatible for "most top selling Xbox
games", and pledged "support " for the current generation Xbox "well into
2006". Two weeks ago, we noted our
concern that the Xbox 360 may not be backward compatible with Xbox software
due to a change in graphics processor chipset manufacturers from Nvidia to
ATI. In a separate meeting with Microsoft management, we confirmed that the
company has agreed to pay a small royalty to Nvidia to allow the Xbox 360's
ATI chipset to emulate the performance of the Nvidia chipset in reading
certain Xbox games. For games written in a single layer
(management assumes that this is a large percentage of Xbox games), the
hardware emulation should perform well.

For games written in multiple layers, a further emulation must be provided.
The company intends to create software "patches" (i.e., separate emulation
programs) for top-selling Xbox games written in multiple layers, and intends
to sell the Xbox 360 with a hard drive that is pre-loaded with these
patches. We presume that the majority of Xbox games will be backward
compatible, and the company assured us that it intends to add patches should
consumer demand warrant such action.

We are less confident about Microsoft's intentions regarding the current
generation Xbox. The company's pledge of "support" is broad, but we believe
that it does not equate to "manufacture" of Xboxes. Rather, we believe that
the company has stockpiled a number of Nvidia chipsets, and is prepared to
manufacture current generation Xboxes through the end of 2005, and perhaps
for a few months beyond. The implications of this are difficult to assess:
on the one hand, it is likely that the company will focus all of its
marketing efforts on the rollout of the Xbox 360, and phase out the Xbox
rapidly, resulting in a rapid ramp in sales of the new hardware; on the
other hand, it is possible that Microsoft will be unable to satisfy demand
for the 360, and may experience a decline in demand for current generation
Xbox software, resulting in lower overall industry sales growth this year.
We believe that the latter scenario is likely to occur, and note that it
could impact overall industry sales growth by approximately 100 bps in 2005.

One final takeaway: Microsoft did not discuss pricing for the Xbox 360, but
assured us in our meeting with management that "neither you nor consumers
will be shocked" at the price. This implies to us that the device will be
priced below $400, and may possibly be priced at $350. As discussed below,
we expect Sony's entry to be priced higher, potentially providing Microsoft
with an additional competitive advantage."

http://www.ga-forum.com/showthread.php?t=50574


¥ D03~Smith ¥

2005-06-06, 8:31 pm

All I hope for is a trade in special at the local electronics boutique so i
can pawn off the old system. The same thing with the PS2. I just want the
new burnout to be able to work on the 360...in fact is that going to be
launched on the new system?? I should check that out.
--
" Franks and Beans~ "


"xenon360" wrote:
quote:

> Microsoft Press Briefing
>
> "The most important announcement at this event was the demonstration of the
> Xbox 360, planned for release this holiday season. Company management stated
> that the Xbox 360 would be backward compatible for "most top selling Xbox
> games", and pledged "support " for the current generation Xbox "well into
> 2006". Two weeks ago, we noted our
> concern that the Xbox 360 may not be backward compatible with Xbox software
> due to a change in graphics processor chipset manufacturers from Nvidia to
> ATI. In a separate meeting with Microsoft management, we confirmed that the
> company has agreed to pay a small royalty to Nvidia to allow the Xbox 360's
> ATI chipset to emulate the performance of the Nvidia chipset in reading
> certain Xbox games. For games written in a single layer
> (management assumes that this is a large percentage of Xbox games), the
> hardware emulation should perform well.
>
> For games written in multiple layers, a further emulation must be provided.
> The company intends to create software "patches" (i.e., separate emulation
> programs) for top-selling Xbox games written in multiple layers, and intends
> to sell the Xbox 360 with a hard drive that is pre-loaded with these
> patches. We presume that the majority of Xbox games will be backward
> compatible, and the company assured us that it intends to add patches should
> consumer demand warrant such action.
>
> We are less confident about Microsoft's intentions regarding the current
> generation Xbox. The company's pledge of "support" is broad, but we believe
> that it does not equate to "manufacture" of Xboxes. Rather, we believe that
> the company has stockpiled a number of Nvidia chipsets, and is prepared to
> manufacture current generation Xboxes through the end of 2005, and perhaps
> for a few months beyond. The implications of this are difficult to assess:
> on the one hand, it is likely that the company will focus all of its
> marketing efforts on the rollout of the Xbox 360, and phase out the Xbox
> rapidly, resulting in a rapid ramp in sales of the new hardware; on the
> other hand, it is possible that Microsoft will be unable to satisfy demand
> for the 360, and may experience a decline in demand for current generation
> Xbox software, resulting in lower overall industry sales growth this year.
> We believe that the latter scenario is likely to occur, and note that it
> could impact overall industry sales growth by approximately 100 bps in 2005.
>
> One final takeaway: Microsoft did not discuss pricing for the Xbox 360, but
> assured us in our meeting with management that "neither you nor consumers
> will be shocked" at the price. This implies to us that the device will be
> priced below $400, and may possibly be priced at $350. As discussed below,
> we expect Sony's entry to be priced higher, potentially providing Microsoft
> with an additional competitive advantage."
>
> http://www.ga-forum.com/showthread.php?t=50574
>
>
>

Mattinglyfan

2005-06-06, 8:31 pm


<xenon360> wrote in message news:da-dnaWNecrPXT7fRVn-hw@comcast.com...
quote:

>
> One final takeaway: Microsoft did not discuss pricing for the Xbox 360,
> but assured us in our meeting with management that "neither you nor
> consumers will be shocked" at the price. This implies to us that the
> device will be priced below $400, and may possibly be priced at $350. As
> discussed below, we expect Sony's entry to be priced higher, potentially
> providing Microsoft with an additional competitive advantage."
>
> http://www.ga-forum.com/showthread.php?t=50574
>


They better add a hell of a lot more to justify the $350 price tag. Even if
Sony launches for $400, that is not a big enough gap to give MS an
advantage.


carrajo

2005-06-07, 12:30 am

> They better add a hell of a lot more to justify the $350 price tag. Even
quote:

> if Sony launches for $400, that is not a big enough gap to give MS an
> advantage.


Why not?

"Mattinglyfan" <Estoscacahuates@comcast.net (deez nuts)> wrote in message
news:Yv-dncRN_8hnKznfRVn-3w@comcast.com...
quote:

>
> <xenon360> wrote in message news:da-dnaWNecrPXT7fRVn-hw@comcast.com...
>
>
> They better add a hell of a lot more to justify the $350 price tag. Even
> if Sony launches for $400, that is not a big enough gap to give MS an
> advantage.
>



Andrew Ryan Chang

2005-06-07, 8:31 pm

In article <da-dnaWNecrPXT7fRVn-hw@comcast.com>, <xenon360> wrote:
quote:

>Microsoft Press Briefing
>
>In a separate meeting with Microsoft management, we confirmed that the
>company has agreed to pay a small royalty to Nvidia to allow the Xbox 360's
>ATI chipset to emulate the performance of the Nvidia chipset in reading
>certain Xbox games. For games written in a single layer
>(management assumes that this is a large percentage of Xbox games), the
>hardware emulation should perform well.
>
>For games written in multiple layers, a further emulation must be provided.


What are these "layers" they're talking about?

(followups to agvx)
--
One side wants to find out [what happened before and on 9/11]; the other
doesn't. This whole story turns on that simple fact.

- Talking Points Memo, March 26 2004.
XBOX 360 in 5 months

2005-06-08, 8:31 pm

The XBOX 360 alone is enough advantage over the PS3, not the price. I
would gladly pay $100 more for the X360 than the PS3, just becuase of
the services (XBOX Live), games (better exclusive games), and system
quality and well thought out performance specs.

Doug Jacobs

2005-06-08, 8:31 pm

In alt.games.video.xbox XBOX 360 in 5 months <dsgorham@gmail.com> wrote:
quote:

> The XBOX 360 alone is enough advantage over the PS3, not the price. I
> would gladly pay $100 more for the X360 than the PS3, just becuase of
> the services (XBOX Live), games (better exclusive games), and system
> quality and well thought out performance specs.


Blind fanaticism is hardly a convincing argument.

How can you comment that the XBox360 has better games when none of them
have been released yet? Heck, even the hardware hasn't been finalized
yet. About the only comment of yours that's worth considering is the one
about XBL. But that's only a factor if you play online games - and the
majority of gamers don't. That said, I applaud Microsoft's announcement
about making XBL free on weekends for trial periods. That should help
increase the number of online gamers greatly - and they'll all be on XBL.
Copyright 2003 - 2008 gamesreviews.net Software forum  PC Hardware reviews