quote:

---

> Cowards bombing London's mass transit?
>
> Can we break out the nukes now?
>
> --
> --==< S m e g h e a d >==--

quote:

---

> Cowards bombing London's mass transit?
>
> Can we break out the nukes now?

quote:

---

> Smeghead wrote:
>
> It's funny, I didn't think Brits were *that* disgruntled about public
> transport.
>
> I just can't *wait* until The Netherlands gets hit, given that we were on
> a list they sent out some time back. They'll probably do The Hague where
> our government sit, Amsterdam our capital city, or Rotterdam our major
> port.
>
> I'll be sure to stay out of the "Binnenhof", where government resides.
>
> --
> Frank

quote:

---

> I'm just thankful the worst is over.

quote:

---

> I considering what they could have attacked - the airport, the eye, the
> parliament, the palace(s) the gurkin...
>
> Be happy these terrorists are kind of "half arsed".

quote:

---

> On Thu, 7 Jul 2005 21:00:49 +0000 (UTC), Adrian Ng wrote:
>
>
>
> For now, I fear.
>
>
> Hmm.

quote:

---

> If it were me doing this, I'd make sure some of my boys were among the
> 'survivors' ASAP with dynamite strapped to their bodies. Taking out a
> significant chunk of the rescuers should be discouraging for the
> survivors of THAT.

quote:

---

> But anyway, the target makes sense. London is fairly well known for
> its subway, it had the potential for greater loss of human life, and
> I'm fairly sure the subway will not be used enthusiastically by
> commuters for some time.

quote:

---

>^,,^< Miracle

quote:

---

> yesterday vainly attempting to get back in here to ask about Adrian,
> Smeggy, Mr K, et al.

quote:

---

> Can we break out the nukes now?

quote:

---

> Frank van Schie wrote:
>
>
> Frank, you frighten me sometimes. This is one of those times.

quote:

---

> You're too young to remember air raids and self-imposed blackouts.
> Perhaps you're too young to remember the days of the IRA bombings.
> So you'll probably be shocked at the stoic attitudes of Londoners when
> they return to riding "the tubes" as soon as they will

quote:

---

> Miracle Smith wrote:
>
> Why? It's a simple look at goals. There are two targets: Symbolic
> ones, like the WTC and the Pentagon, and fear-inducing ones, like
> targets that are used by common folk. That makes public
> transportation a good one.
> Once you've hit that target, damage is done, rescue folks are sent in.
> Brave rescue folk who set everything aright. So if you want to induce
> terror, blow the XXXX out of them. If not even the rescuers taking
> care of survivors are safe, who is?
>
> The answer, of course, is noone. Rescue workers will have to stay
> backed off in the future, causing further loss of life in the
> aftermath of future strikes, and future strikes can happen
> *anywhere*. Including hospitals, schools, public services, etc. Even
> if you don't have the resources to do a strike for years, people'll
> stay moderately cowed for some time.
>
> I'm not such a great thinker on these matters, but this seems obvious.
> Not pleasant, but obvious.

quote:

---

> Speaking of resources: I'm sure Bin Laden's crew made a killing (no
> pun) on the markets yesterday and today. I had some index options in
> an online game which I bought a week or so back, which quadrupled in
> value within 2 hours, and today I bought other options which doubled
> in the other direction. Had one known about this in advance, it
> would've been free money.
>
> Which raises the possibility that the actual goal of this attack was
> simply a fund-raiser. Not exactly optimistic news.

quote:

---

> Shit! Not Smeggy. Who's the other fellow in the UK?
> My mind is seriously not working, having actually slept during
> most of the night for a change.

quote:

---

> Damn, what a horrific 24 hours this has been. I was still up, watching
> the news when the first reports came on, and spent a good deal of
> yesterday vainly attempting to get back in here to ask about Adrian,
> Smeggy, Mr K, et al.
>
> Good old CNN showed me and Ross all the horrific details in living
> color. I knew Mr K was a fair distance away, but was very concerned
> about Adrian and Smeggy. Especially Adrian- I'm sure you said you
> live in London.
>

quote:

---

> I'm fine. I live in Harrow - but go to Kings Cross frequently.
>
> There is a plaque on the wall where some passengers died in a bombing
> (i think)
> Heh. Now there will be two.
> Its kind of weird seeing your train station on tv like that.
> I remember they were doing some sort of construction work on it as
> well (as they've always been).

quote:

---

> Adrian Ng wrote:
>
>
> Yeesh, that was too close. Ross tells me that Kings
> Cross is a very busy station- he used it daily back when
> he worked in London.
>
> We heard on the news here that the third train was
> nearly into Paddington Station when it blew up. I think
> the distance was 100 meters out. The little bit I know
> about London tells me that Paddington Station is very
> close to the Tower of London, isn't it?

quote:

---

> If the bombing bastards had taken out that cool old
> landmark I think I'd be on a ship, on my way over there to
> find some bomber's XXX!

quote:

---

> If the bombing bastards had taken out that cool old
> landmark I think I'd be on a ship, on my way over there to
> find some bomber's XXX!

quote:

---

> Miracle Smith's last words before the Sword of Azrial plunged through his
> body were:
>
> If you do that, let me grab some guns, a chainsaw, and some of my other
> playtoys and tag along!

quote:

---

> Cowards bombing London's mass transit?
>
> Can we break out the nukes now?
>

quote:

---

> I suppose my initial shock was due to the fact that I think of
> such things, but don't expect other folks to have such dark thoughts
> as I sometimes.
> Seeing it in print was a bit unnerving, I suppose.

quote:

---

>
> Where have you been hiding this powerful, analytical, I-understand-
> how-the-stock-market-works brain? You'd have me believe you're
> just a working stiff who reads a lot of sci-fi and fiction, when in fact
> you read a lot more non-fiction than fiction, evidently.

quote:

---

> Damn, I wish now that I'd consulted you before buying that penny
> stock. In a Canadian diamond mine, no less.......

quote:

---

> "Hellmark" <hellmark@gmail.XXXXSPAM.com> wrote in message
> news:pan.2005.07.08.20.47.02.16892@gmail.XXXXSPAM.com...
>
>
> and the duck cum?!?!?!

quote:

---

> "Hellmark" <hellmark@gmail.XXXXSPAM.com> wrote in message
> news:pan.2005.07.08.20.47.02.16892@gmail.XXXXSPAM.com...
> and the duck cum?!?!?!

quote:

---

> I worked at Paddington last year. I have no idea where Tower of
> London is relative to that.

quote:

---

> I'm annoyed they blew up a double decker bus!

quote:

---

>^,,^< Miracle

quote:

---

> Miracle Smith's last words before the Sword of Azrial plunged through
> his body were:
>
> If you do that, let me grab some guns, a chainsaw, and some of my
> other playtoys and tag along!

quote:

---

>^,,^< Miracle

quote:

---

> "Hellmark" <hellmark@gmail.XXXXSPAM.com> wrote in message
> news:pan.2005.07.08.20.47.02.16892@gmail.XXXXSPAM.com...
>
> and the duck cum?!?!?!

quote:

---

> miracle, if it was a horrific 24 hours, youre way too XXXXing
> sensitive. as stated before, this was a pretty pathetic attack as far
> as terroristic acts go. this could almost be classified more easily
> along with the attacks in iraq that occur, oh, i dunno.. nearly every
> XXXXing day. at least in terms of scale.

quote:

---

>^,,^< Miracle

quote:

---

> Miracle Smith wrote:
>
> Not true. On, pretty much, all accounts. The brain was on display, and
> it doesn't really understand the stockmarket, just the very basic
> processes concerning it.
>
>
> Don't believe me. I'm no major investor, and am not likely to ever be
> such. I just don't have the mind that covers all the angles and
> possibilities. But options, especially index options, are easy.
> Bad news => index goes down
> Expect bad news => buy puts
> Good news => index goes up
> Expect good news => buy calls
>
> Then you can go to straddles to make a more limited amount of money on
> any major course shift (either up or down) while losing if the course
> stays horizontal or strangles for horizontal movement of underlying
> values, or any of the other well-known constructions.

quote:

---

> One might also expect expensive orders to come in to British
> construction companies with tunneling experience, after these attacks.
> This would cause their stockprice (if they're public) to rise. That
> isn't insight, that's simply an effect of having badly damaged
> tunnels.

quote:

---

>^,,^< Miracle

quote:

---

>Miracle Smith wrote:
>
>
> Shit! Not Smeggy. Who's the other fellow in the UK?
>My mind is seriously not working, having actually slept during
>most of the night for a change.

quote:

---

>On 8 Jul 2005 11:26:33 GMT, Miracle Smith wrote:
>
>
>Huh, we got through a few years of being bombed and we're still
>determined. What makes some people think that three or four bombs will
>make us stop and think?

quote:

---

>Smeghead wrote:
>
>
> XXXXin' A man. But where is our target?

quote:

---

> Because it worked on the pussified Spanish!
>
> Brits have stiff upper lips!
>
> The Spanish have limp, foppy wrists.
>
> Please, don't bomb us, Mr. Terrorist! We'll back down! We'll empower
> your tactics!
>
> I think the title of "Surrender Monkeys" should go from the French and
> be bestowed upon the Spanish. At least for the time being.

quote:

---

>On Fri, 08 Jul 2005 23:39:01 -0500, Smeghead wrote:
>
>
>People seem to have forgotten the number of years that the IRA did similar
>things. Did they end up getting what they wanted?

quote:

---

>Ah well, enough of this silly mud-slinging thread for myself.

quote:

---

> One day, while skipping through the forest, I heard the voice of
> "Smeghead"
> <tribesfan@hotmail.com> coming from a tree, and thought, "Man, this is
> f*ed
> up," but carried on the following conversation anyway:
>
>
> nukes? you people need to stop making assumptions/overreacting. for
> starters, as has been noted, this was a fairly weak (i wouldve said
> pathetic, but i suspect that wouldve been interpretted by some as an
> insult
> to the integrity of the bombers) attack. if not for the multiple targets
> (i
> refuse to call this coordinated, its not that XXXXing difficult to set
> multiple timers to go off reasonably close together), this would hardly be
> anything special. second part, all the people automatically assuming this
> was an islamic/al qaeda attack are XXXXing morons. while it is a
> possibility, its not a given. there are terrorists that arent islamic, you
> XXXXing idiots.

quote:

---

> miracle, if it was a horrific 24 hours, youre way too XXXXing sensitive.
> as
> stated before, this was a pretty pathetic attack as far as terroristic
> acts
> go. this could almost be classified more easily along with the attacks in
> iraq that occur, oh, i dunno.. nearly every XXXXing day. at least in terms
> of scale.
>
> --
> Adept

quote:

---

> I think everyone here already agrees with you on most of this -
> (apart from the bit about people being morons for making the most
> logical assumption, i guess)

quote:

---

> "Adrian Ng" <spam.ng@btopenworld.com> wrote in
> news:dao4jm$53u$1@nwrdmz01.dmz.ncs.ea.ibs-infra.bt.com:
>
>
> The horror! We all agree with D!
>
> And I was concerned at the quick jumping-to-conclusion that this was
> Islamist and not something else, perhaps Irish. All religious people are
> nuts, but most aren't violently nuts. Including most Islamists.
>
> The thing that bugs me most about disasters is the media's desire to rub
> our noses in it for as long as possible and get the most milage from it.
> Good old Yellow Journalism. And even the most "respectable" news
> organizations do it, holding onto a story long after they've run out of
> any
> new information. It's not like there isn't a lot of other stuff happening
> in the world, much of it good. But good news doesn't sell like bad news.
> That's why I don't follow the major media.

quote:

---

> Frank van Schie wrote:
>
>
> Huh?!?!?!? Oh my word- I thought a person simply bought
> "stocks". I have no clue what "puts" and "calls" are, and don't
> want to know! I'll just stick to my plan of dying poor. Its simpler!

quote:

---

> Yes, okay, that I can follow. I'm too lazy to do anything,
> but I 'capiche'.

quote:

---

> AnnieMae and I were talking on the 4th about all the money
> our government is spending on "homeland security" and what
> a farce it is. No one is safe, no matter who you are or where in
> the world you live. If it's your time to go, you're gonna go, and
> no amount of tax money is going to prevent that.
>
> All it takes is one fanatic with something explosive to create
> havoc. And religions are full of fanatics.

quote:

---

> I'll tell you anyway. "Put options" allow you to sell stock at a certain
> price. "Call options" allow you to buy stock at a certain price. You pay
> a premium for this

quote:

---

> The most dangerous thing I have to worry about for the moment is
> hurricane Dennis blowing my house over down here by New Orleans.

quote:

---

> On 8 Jul 2005 11:28:40 GMT, "Miracle Smith" <miracle@spamcop.net>
> wrote:
>
>
> The hearts and minds of man.

quote:

---

> The thing that bugs me most about disasters is the media's desire to
> rub our noses in it for as long as possible and get the most milage
> from it. Good old Yellow Journalism. And even the most "respectable"
> news organizations do it, holding onto a story long after they've run
> out of any new information. It's not like there isn't a lot of other
> stuff happening in the world, much of it good. But good news doesn't
> sell like bad news. That's why I don't follow the major media.

quote:

---

> Miracle Smith wrote:
>
> Same here. "Dying poor" sounds like an attainable plan for me. :P

quote:

---

> Miracle Smith wrote:
>
> It has always been the case. No reason to get too upset about it, as
> there *is* safety in numbers, but you're not less safe now than a few
> years ago, just 'cause you know about the loonies.
>
> I see no reason to panic.

quote:

---

>^,,^< Miracle

quote:

---

> On Sat, 09 Jul 2005 20:13:50 +0200, Frank van Schie wrote:
>
>
> ... time for a beer, methinks.
>
> Er, oh aye... [snip]

quote:

---

> funereals

quote:

---

> What do you read?
>
> The local paper?

quote:

---

>
> It has always been the case. No reason to get too upset about it, as
> there *is* safety in numbers, but you're not less safe now than a few
> years ago, just 'cause you know about the loonies.

quote:

---

> Those who die by terrorism or plane crashes all die in one place at once,
> so it's pretty spectacular and makes good fodder for the news. But in
> terms of numbers, it's still pretty small compared to other causes. Far,
> far more die in automobile incidents but they die alone, and it's common,
> so it doesn't make the major media. Even the local paper will only report
> those that are particularly unusual. Then there's all the little kids who
> drown in buckets. And the safety nazis who want to mandate the
> manufacture of deliberate leaks in the buckets to prevent it.

quote:

---

> The thing that bugs me the most about terrorism is that all the popular
> authors and TV/movie writers start using terrorists as the only
> conceivable villain. 10 years ago it was international drug cartels.
> These people have no imagination, and their lack of imagination carries
> over into an unreasonable fear in the general populace. Far too many
> resources and far too much panic is directed at a small source of risk.

quote:

---

> It's similar to the way the media treat guns in America. To tell from the
> movies, America really is one big wild west, and every American is an
> irresponsible version of Dirty Harry, armed to the teeth and totally
> clueless about how to use the hardware, ready to shoot at the smallest
> slight.
>
> My brother works for the MTA (subway) in LA and regularly works with
> directors who want to use "his" trains for movies. He was involved with
> the making of Speed, for instance. He tells me some pretty amazingly
> stupid things the directors want to do for dramatic effect, totally at
> odds with technical reality, and a good way to mislead the public into
> yet another political stampede in the wrong direction.

quote:

---

> Shit! Not Smeggy. Who's the other fellow in the UK?

quote:

---

> I absolutely LOVE this news story. Read it:
> http://www.theonion.com/news/index.php?issue=3521

quote:

---

>Cowards bombing London's mass transit?
>
>Can we break out the nukes now?

quote:

---

> Miracle Smith wrote:
>
>
> ~*Shrodinger*~!!!!!!!! He's the other UK dweller!
>
> Anyone heard fron Shro?
>
>
> _______________________________________________________________________________
> Posted Via Uncensored-News.Com - Accounts Starting At $6.95 -
> http://www.uncensored-news.com
> <><><><><><><> The Worlds Uncensored News Source
> <><><><><><><><>
>

quote:

---

> On Thu, 07 Jul 2005 12:54:18 -0500, I heard the following crap spew
> forth from "Smeghead" <tribesfan@hotmail.com>:
>
>
> As usual, I'm late to the party, but I wanted to respond. As some of
> you may know, I now work as a contractor maintaining Unix systems for
> the IRS here in Memphis, TN. On the day of the attacks,
> allllllllllllll-the-XXXXing-way over in London, what does the US
> government do? Heighten the security at gov't locations. So because
> some XXXXtard blows up a bus in XXXXsville, Europe, I have to get a
> 3-finger XXX probe before I can go to work at a civilian government
> site which contains nothing of value? Excellent choice, Mr. Bush.
>
> And yes, I blame that XXXX-head for every damn moronic "security"
> measure that we have to suffer through, just because he seems to want
> to throw money away on useless "security" rules that do nothing but
> reduce the security of our nation. But that's a topic for another
> rant.
>
> RagManX
> http://www.gamepatches.info/ - Are you up to date?

quote:

---

> On Thu, 07 Jul 2005 12:54:18 -0500, I heard the following crap spew
> forth from "Smeghead" <tribesfan@hotmail.com>:
>
>
> As usual, I'm late to the party, but I wanted to respond. As some of
> you may know, I now work as a contractor maintaining Unix systems for
> the IRS here in Memphis, TN. On the day of the attacks,
> allllllllllllll-the-XXXXing-way over in London, what does the US
> government do? Heighten the security at gov't locations. So because
> some XXXXtard blows up a bus in XXXXsville, Europe, I have to get a
> 3-finger XXX probe before I can go to work at a civilian government
> site which contains nothing of value? Excellent choice, Mr. Bush.
>
> And yes, I blame that XXXX-head for every damn moronic "security"
> measure that we have to suffer through, just because he seems to want
> to throw money away on useless "security" rules that do nothing but
> reduce the security of our nation. But that's a topic for another
> rant.

quote:

---

> It's unfortunate the news media is government controlled, otherwise
> American's would hear the truth about their government, and the
> atrocities they themselves have and are committing against humanity,
> of which they so quickly condemn others for committing.
>
> What the news is forbidden to talk about is just how Bush is
> liberating the Iraqi people. For example :
>
> By intentionally bombing Baghdad water purification system,
> their dams, reservoirs, water and sewage systems, causing the
> sewage to flow into the Tigress River, contaminating the water
> causing massive deaths by disease.
>
> http://www.ummah.net/waragainstislam/western.htm
>
> Intentionally contaminating the Iraqi people, the land, water, air,
> even our own soldiers with depleted uranium, just as Bush Sr
> did in 1990/91.
>
> http://www.truthout.org/docs_04/082304W.shtml
>
> Of the 575,000 soldiers in Gulf I, 325,000 are either dead or on
> permanent disability today.
>
> And just how does the US government/CIA show their
> appreciation for those who are willing to sacrifice their lives,
> based on nothing but the government's lies, enabling the
> cowards in Washington D.C. who are never willing to make
> any sacrifices, they only fill their bank accounts from the
> billions in profits, by forcing our soldiers to take their
> potentially lethal, experimental anthrax vaccine, even
> after the courts ordered it stopped, but the DOD continued
> for another 18 months. Yes, the same vaccine that's caused
> countless deaths, major health problems in young healthy
> adults, and major birth defects.
>
> And of course they use the usual cover up classified for
> national security, which is nothing more than a way to
> protect those responsible for 20-25 years for the crimes
> they've committed.
>
> http://www.anthraxadeadlyshotinthedark.com/
> http://www.cidrap.umn.edu/cidrap/co...305anthrax.html
>
>
> Intentionally bombed two children's hospitals filled with
> defenseless, sick children, etc., etc. The list just goes on and
> on.
>
> 26 Mar 2003 - Rutbah children's hospital aerial bombardment
>
> 02 Apr 2003 9:30AM Red Crescent maternity hospital and vicinity,
> Baghdad nearby Government buildings aerial bombardment
>
> http://www.iraqbodycount.net/databa...p?ts=1119286382
>
>
> 04 Apr 2003 - 04 May 2003 - Al-Alwiyah Children's Hospital,
>
> http://www.iraqbodycount.net/databa...p?ts=1119286563
>
> Yes, the US government/CIA give a whole new meaning to
> the words liberation, freedom and democracy, and how
> they show their appreciation, bar none.
>
> It's the US government/CIA who claims they're for human
> rights, democracy and freedom, while they themselves are
> responsible for the deaths of 6 million innocent lives
> throughout the world with their torture, illegal overthrowing
> governments, including democratic governments, mass
> extermination for population control using their created
> bio-chemicals, germ warfare, contamination from their
> depleted uranium, including our own soldiers, etc.
>
> http://www.informationclearinghouse...article4068.htm
>
> http://www.truthout.org/docs_04/082304W.shtml
>
> I wonder how many American's are even aware of the fact that
> Wackenhut Security, owned and run by ex-CIA/FBI agents just
> happened to be in charge of airport security at all three airports
> on 9/11 where the planes were hijacked.
>
> Yes, the same Wackenhut Security who Bush has teamed up with
> FEMA, who receives 99% of all government security contracts without
> bidding of course, and who has recently replaced the security at both
> West Point and Annapolis.
>
> And the real clincher was, supposedly, the job of Bush's appointed
> 9/11 COVER UP commission was to find out how the attacks could
> have happened in the first place, yet never questioned Wackenhut
> Security.
>
> They apparently weren't concerned or already knew just how 19
> hijackers managed to not only get past passenger security without
> tickets, just as they didn't care about how those same 19 hijackers
> managed to get past the boarding gates without boarding passes.
> Because they already knew it was the CIA who planned and attacked
> the US. Just as 99% of the world knows it, and they all can't be
> wrong.
>
> Another very interesting fact that didn't make the news either,
> regarding
> the so called experts backing up the government's BS about how steel
> columns covered in fire retardant material, between concrete slabs
> softened in less than 10 minutes, one supposedly a university of
> Colorado civil engineering professor and the Trade Center's
> construction manager, Hyman Brown. When in fact Hyman
> Brown is only a Senior Instructor - Construction Management.
>
> The news story about Hyman Brown and his quotes about what caused
> the WTC building to collapse :
>
> http://www.firehouse.com/terrorist/...itstoomuch.html
>
> I did a search about this news article, and this Hyman Brown.
> Some very interesting information came up.
>
> First, there's two different sets of URL's leading to the civil
> engineering
> dept for this University. The first set of URL's has the company name
> of Bechtel in the URL.
>
> Bechtel as in the same Bechtel Corp that Rumsfeld was once
> President of, who even made deals with Saddam on behalf of
> Bechtel during Reagan administration,
>
> http://www.radioproject.org/archive/2003/2103.html
>
>
> and Bechtel who just happens to be sharing the contracts to rebuild
> Iraq along with Halliburton.
>
> http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/artic...11/BU141131.DTL
>
> And the Bechtel URL's shows one person as Hyman Brown, and the
> civil.colorado.edu URL shows a totally different person as Hyman
> Brown.
>
> The first URL's connected with a Hyman Brown is :
>
> http://bechtel.colorado.edu/new/fac...ple.cgi?faculty
> http://bechtel.colorado.edu/new/fac...eople.cgi?brown
>
> The second URL, without Bechtel's name in the URL for the
> university of Colorado showing the faculty, happens to show a
> totally different person as being Hyman Brown :
>
> http://civil.colorado.edu/web/people/index.html
>
> Another "Expert" named was Masoud Sanayei, from Tuft University,
> also connected to Bechtel.
>
> http://66.102.7.104/search?q=cache:...i+bechtel&hl=en
> http://66.102.7.104/search?q=cache:...i+bechtel&hl=en
>
> A very interesting quote by HENRY KISSINGER in an address
> to the super secret Bilderberg Organization meeting at Evian,
> France, May 21, 1992. as transcribed from a tape recording
> made by one of the Swiss delegates will be destroyed :
>
> "Today American's would be outraged if U.N. troops entered
> Los Angeles to restore order; tomorrow they will be grateful.
> This is especially true if they were told there was an outside
> threat from beyond, WHETHER REAL OR PROMULGATED,
> that threatened our very existence. It is then that all peoples
> of the world will plead with world leaders to deliver them from
> this evil. The one thing every man fears is the unknown. When
> PRESENTED with this SCENARIO, INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS
> will be WILLINGLY relinquished for the guarantee of their well
> being granted to them by THEIR WORLD GOVERNMENT."
>
> And I wonder how many American's are aware it was their very own
> US government/CIA who created, trained and financed the Contra's,
> who mass tortured and murdered tens of thousands of innocent lives
> and intentionally destabilized Nicaragua economically to put their
> dictator puppets in power ?
>
> http://www.informationclearinghouse...article4068.htm
>
> http://usa.usembassy.de/etexts/spee...oric/rriran.htm
>
> Yes, friends like the US government/CIA, who needs enemies.
>
> According to the definition of a terrorist, the only one's who qualify
> is the US government/CIA and the British government who have
> illegally invaded two nations based on intentional lies.
>
> Definition of " TERRORIST" :
>
> "The unlawful use or threatened use of force or
> violence by a person or an organized group against
> people or property with the intention of intimidating
> or coercing societies or governments, often for
> ideological or political reasons. "
>
> Definition of " Ideological "
>
> " a theory, or set of beliefs or principles, especially
> one on which a political system, party or organization
> is based : socialist/capitalist ideology "
>
> Someone really needs to get Bush a dictionary and teach him
> how to read.
>
> Another prime example, he keeps calling those fighting to prevent
> the US and Britain from stealing their nation and oil, insurgents.
>
> If a nation invaded America and tried to take it over, and
> Americans fought to prevent them from succeeding, would they
> be insurgents, or PATRIOTS ?
>
> Yes, believe it or not, the same applies to the Iraqi people,
> meaning they're PATRIOTS, and not insurgents like Bush keeps
> trying to brain wash people into thinking.
>
> But based on American's track record, I wouldn't bet on them
> doing much fighting against anyone. No, their idea of how to
> solve the corruption, crime and atrocities their government
> is doing to them and around the world, they have peaceful
> demonstrations with signs, or even more stupid, the write to
> the very people who are screwing them in the first place and
> complain.
>
> I wonder how many people are aware that the AID's virus,
> West Nile virus were both not only created at the CIA
> laboratory in Fort Detrick, Maryland, but the cure for AID's
> which has proven to work with only one injection even
> happens to be patented.
>
> AIDS patent :
> http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-...Sect2=HITOFF&d=
> PALL&op=1&U=/methyl/rhenium.html&R=1&if=G&al=50&s1=5676977.WKU
> .&OS=PN/5676977&RS=PN/5676977
>
> United States Patent 5,676,977
> Antelman October 14, 1997
> Method of curing AIDS with tetrasilver tetroxide molecular crystal
> devices
>
> Abstract
>
> The diamagnetic semiconducting molecular crystal tetrasilver tetroxide
> (Ag.sub.4 O.sub.4) is utilized for destroying the AIDS virus,
> destroying
> AIDS synergistic pathogens and immunity suppressing
> moieties (ISM) in humans. A single intravenous injection of the
> devices is all that is required for efficacy at levels of about 40 PPM
> of human blood. The device molecular crystal contains two mono
> and two trivalent silver ions capable of "firing" electrons capable of
> electrocuting the AIDS virus, pathogens and ISM. When administered
> into the bloodstream, the device electrons will be triggered by
> pathogens, a proliferating virus and ISM, and when fired will
> simultaneously trigger a redox chelation mechanism resulting in
> divalent silver moieties which chelate and bind active sites of the
> entities destroying them. The devices are completely non-toxic.
> However, they put stress on the liver causing hepatomegaly, but
> there is no loss of liver function.
>
> Inventors: Antelman; Marvin S. (Rehovot, IL)
> Assignee: Antelman Technologies Ltd. (Providence, RI)
> Appl. No.: 658955
> Filed: May 31, 1996
>
> AID's cure works :
>
> http://www.boydgraves.com/news/111103.doc
>
> I suspect the bombings in London are a diversion to get people's
> minds away from the truth coming out about the lies to invade Iraq,
> the Downing memo's, and about the reporters and naming their source
> regarding the leak from the white house about the CIA agent. Just
> a guess.
>
> I wonder how many American's are aware there was even a trial in
> 1999 held in Memphis, TN, which the jury found the US government,
> State of TN, Memphis, TN law enforcement and others guilty for the
> conspiracy and assassination of Dr. Martin L. King Jr.
>
> It came out in the trial "James E. Ray was a patsy, just as Lee H.
> Oswald had been".
>
> According to the government and their propaganda, James E. Ray
> assassinated Dr. King Jr.
>
> Amazing given the fact James E. Ray wasn't even in Memphis, TN on
> the day of the assassination. And had the government really tested
> the rifle like they claimed, and stated it was the murder weapon, they
> would have found the scope had never been calibrated and would
> have missed hitting Dr. King Jr by 3-4 feet.
>
> But then, the government already was aware of the fact, since they
> planned and carried out the assassination in the first place, and made
> up their bogus lies in their report to feed the American people, just
> as
> they've done about 9/11, and the Kennedy assassination.
>
> BTW, Dr. King Jr. wasn't assassinated for his civil rights movement
> like people were programmed to believe, but instead he was becoming
> a threat with his anti-war movement, just as Kennedy had become.
> And the big boys weren't willing to give up making billions in profits
> from
> weapons and arms sales, government equipment etc.
>
> Amazing how 3 towers happened to perfectly implode with precision,
> and supposedly without demolition on that day. Except for the fact
> that
> the WTC controller stated in a PBS documentary he gave the
> order for the WTC building 7 to be brought down. Which confirmed
> there were explosives already placed throughout the building.
>
> Then FEMA made the stupid statement claiming it was the well
> protected diesel fuel tank that exploded.
>
> As for the twin towers, first they claimed the trusses gave way as
> to why they fell, but as usual they don't do their homework, just
> make ludicrous claims. Then they change their lies when they
> discovered the trusses's weren't the main support for the
> entire building, but instead the central column cores were,
> which were still standing after the collapse.
>
> When a government is allowed to investigate themselves,
> you no longer have a democracy, but rather a dictatorship
> to cover up your crimes and atrocities, as the US government
> has become.
>
> Prime example, and maybe someone can explain to me just how
> child pornography rings, pedophiles, sex slave rings etc.,
> protecting the sick, twisted, demented, perverted, low life
> scum running and involved with can even be thought of as
> NATIONAL SECURITY, much less be classified as NATIONAL SECURITY.
>
> Yes, all investigations were stopped by the CIA, giving the
> excuse of NATIONAL SECURITY.
>
> Well I guess when you have so many top government officials
> who are participating, including Bush Sr., you certainly don't
> want it found out.
>
> http://www.onlinejournal.com/Media/...1805madsen.html
>
> http://www.parapolitics.info/phorum...=36&i=671&t=671
>
> http://illuminati-news.com/bush-cia...child-abuse.htm
>
> And yet Congress had the audacity to impeach Clinton because he
> lied to a grand jury about having sex between two consenting
> adults, which wasn't anyone's business in the first place.
> Amazing.
>
> And if people believe the US government gives a rats tail about them,
> or America, this should prove just how much.
>
> The US government has been illegally taxing wages/salaries since
> 1917, even stealing people's property based on owed back taxes
> which were illegal to begin with. While the elite/wealthy were filling
> their bank accounts, the American people and America have been
> raped for decades and doing without.
>
> "In 1916, after the Supreme Court ruled in
> Brushaber that wages were not income within
> the meaning of the 16th Amendment, Congress was
> forced to amend the Income Tax Act of 1913, to
> remove wages from the definition of taxable
> income. See Section 25 of the Income Tax Act of
> 1916. Then, in 1917, Congress amended its Act
> of 1916, to outlaw the withholding of wages
> from the paychecks of citizens and directed
> the Executive Department to refund all wages
> withheld. All this, of course was done to bring
> the code into compliance with the Brushaber".
>
> http://www.givemeliberty.org/docs/T...hCD/Attach1.htm
>
> Something people really need to give serious thought to,
> before you're so willing to give up all your rights as a free
> nation. Because it's nothing but made up lies so the
> government can take those rights and your freedom
> from you, which is exactly what they're doing, and
> it's their goal.
>
> Forget about Republican and Democrat, it's become "We
> the Government, By the Government, For the Government",
> and no longer "We the People, By the People, For the People",
>
> It's the people who decide what kind of future they want, either
> freedom or a police state, and if you believe giving up all your
> rights is going to protect you, then the government's goal making
> sure people don't get educated has been reached, and people
> are nothing more than enslaved sheep without brains. That
> being the case, they really don't need freedom.
>
> Until the US government/CIA terrorist network is shut down,
> there will never be peace for humanity, because it's a money
> making, power controlling business, at the expense of humanity.
>
> Who always makes the sacrifices ? It's never the elite, wealthy,
> or top government officials or their family members, no they have
> the hardship of stealing the American people blind, and raking
> in the trillions in profit.
>
> Prime example, Congress has been aware since the end of 2001
> there's $3.7 trillion missing from the HUD and DOD accounts,
> and has done absolutely nothing about it.
>
> That's approx $4 million for every adult in America they've pocketed
> from the taxes they've been illegally taxing the American people
> on their wages/salaries.
>
> That's not counting the bogus "War on Drugs", program, which the
> American people have been paying for so the CIA makes 100% profit
> from their drug trafficking network.
>
> In 2001 there was 83 tons of cocaine exported from Afghanistan under
> the Taliban, and in 2002 under Bush's new puppet there was 350 +
> tons of cocaine exported. Yes, we can see just how much progress
> has been made thanks to Bush's BS "War on Drugs" dept.
> They're raking in trillions, and the American people are going further
> into poverty with the government raping them for every dime they
> can.
>
> So yes, your Great Aunt, along with other American's who believe
> the ever changing lies by the US government, might want to start
> thinking for themselves, and stop believing a government based
> only on their word, and no evidence.
>
> Foreign terrorists don't need to attack the US to bring it down, the
> US government is managing to do that quite well on their own.
>
> And someone really needs to get Bush a dictionary and teach him
> how to read.
>
> Prime example, he keeps calling those fighting to prevent the US and
> Britain from stealing their nation and oil, insurgents. If a nation
> invaded
> America and tried to take it over, would you be called insurgents, or
> PATRIOTS ?
>
> Yes, believe it or not, the same applies to the Iraqi people, meaning
> they're PATRIOTS, and not insurgents and Bush keeps trying to brain
> wash people into thinking.
>
> As for my family, along with 46 other families who have and
> are in the process of leaving the US, as we prefer to live in
> freedom, and can't support a corrupted, pre-meditated mass
> murdering government who has brought America down to
> the lowest level ever thought possible by mankind.
>
> And people ignoring the facts, or keeping their heads buried
> because they don't want to do anything about it, or afraid
> they'll loose what little they have left, trust me, it's not going
> to change the facts, and you're going to loose what little you
> do have left anyway. You can take that to the bank.
>
> When the American people won't even go out on a non-violent
> national strike forcing the corruption out of office and held
> accountable for the atrocities they've committed and are
> committing against humanity, then the American people
> are just as guilty as those in Washington D.C.
>
> It's beyond pitiful when other nations riot against Bush every
> where he goes, and the American people can't really be that
> stupid to believe the government BS crap they're jealous of
> America. Because there's nothing left to be jealous of.
>
> American's have already lost their self respect years ago, and
> now are loosing their jobs, homes, charging themselves into
> massive debt just to survive, rather than standing up for
> themselves and the crimes being committed against them.
>
> Yes, I would have to say American's are probably the stupidest
> people on the planet.
>
> When American's can't even see their nation referred to as
> "SATAN", and Bush is named one of the three most evil men
> in history, along side of Saddam and Hitler, then it's safe to
> say there isn't a chinamen's chance in hell of American's
> taking back what's been stolen from them, the nation they
> claim to love and care so much about, and returning it to
> the nation it once was.
>
> Before American's agree to support the mass murdering of hundreds
> of thousands of innocent lives, perhaps they require verified evidence
> first, and not just the word of Bush. Especially since Bush Sr.,
> pulled the same trick in 1990/91, and even later admitted it.
>
> But Congress, who is supposed to work for the American people, and
> is paid by the American people, instead chose to commit treason,
> rather than impeach the criminal.
>
> Yes, the Bush family certainly gives a new meaning to democracy.
>
> I didn't intend for this to be so long, but people really need to
> get their heads out of the sand, and stop believing they live in
> Pleasantville, USA, and start seeing the government for what
> they really are, and what's really going on right under their noses.
> Because it's not going to be much longer before it will be to late to
> do anything about it.
>

quote:

---

> Brace yourself with
> beverage of choice and join me in some potent anger.
> Here's her post, verbatim:
>

quote:

---

> One day, while skipping through the forest, I heard the voice of "Miracle
> Smith" <miracle@spamcop.net> coming from a tree, and thought, "Man, this
> is
> f*ed up," but carried on the following conversation anyway:
>
>
> conspiracy theorists are funny. so are the people that take them
> seriously.
> ;p
>

quote:

---

>
> "DEbig3" <debig3@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:Xns9691B5D713F08omgwtf@216.196.97.136...
>
> I would say something, but the black helicopters are circling my house and
> I can't find my aluminum foil hat...
>
> Quixote
>

quote:

---

> One day, while skipping through the forest, I heard the voice of
> "Miracle Smith" <miracle@spamcop.net> coming from a tree, and
> thought, "Man, this is f*ed up," but carried on the following
> conversation anyway:
>
>
> conspiracy theorists are funny. so are the people that take them
> seriously. ;p

quote:

---

>
>"Randy Graham" <ragmanx@spamex.com> wrote in message
>news:do54d19pg59bkvaulv85tlkgl60ifdeb64@4ax.com...
>
>I never thought I would hear you complain about free sex........

quote:

---

>Quixote

quote:

---

> On Mon, 11 Jul 2005 15:04:01 -0500, I heard the following crap spew
> forth from "Quixote" <quixote@writeme.com>:
>
>
> OK, that made me laugh.
>
> It's not the free sexual experience I mind, so much as the lack of
> cuddle time when they're done.
>
> How's that?
>
>
>

quote:

---

> It's not the free sexual experience I mind, so much as the lack of
> cuddle time when they're done.