| Smeghead 2005-04-17, 8:34 pm |
| On Sun, 17 Apr 2005 20:27:09 +0200, Frank van Schie
<frankNOSPAM@email.it> wrote:
quote:
>Smeghead wrote:
>
>I am reminded of an awesome court scene which, apparently, actually
>happened, in which a married lady, Mrs. X, was accused in a divorce case
>of adultery with Mr. Y (no, not Mr. K)
>
>Court: Did you and Mr. Y have sex on $date1 in $city1?
>Mrs. X: No.
>Court: Did you and Mr. Y have sex on $date2 in $city2?
>Mrs. X: No.
>Court: Did you and Mr. Y have sex on $date3 in $city3?
>Mrs. X: I refuse to answer that question on the grounds that it might
>incriminate me.
>
>Brilliant. I'm sure her lawyer must've had any number of colorful
>insults to share with the lady.
HAHA! So much for trying to occlude information and obfuscate the
facts!
Methinks she doth protest too LITTLE!
--
--==< S m e g h e a d >==--
|