quote:

---

> I have a G4 4600 TI and am running driver 91.33. I get constant
> blinking and jerking and when quitting the program it hangs my computer
> and I have to reboot. Does this sound like a Video driver problem?
> Could it be other problems as well. I am using the default settings for
> the demo which are really pretty low performance settings, I have a P4
> 2.8 with 1gig of ram.
>
> Thanks for your reply
>

quote:

---

> drtee@cox.net wrote:
>
> Hello, drtee
>
> The latest fully qualified, released video driver version I see on
> nvidia's site is 91.31. Are you sure you're not experimenting with a Beta
> driver? The behavior you describe is typically related to a video driver
> problem.
>
> -Seadog

quote:

---

>
> "Seadog" <seadog@nunyabidness.com> wrote in message
> news:OPaFg.1869$q63.554@newssvr13.news.prodigy.com...
>
> The 91.33 driver just eliminates the "SLI not detected" bubble that pops
> up in the system tray. Known bug that was squashed with a quick patch
> which is 91.33. Yes it is beta, but shouldn't affect frame rate.
>

quote:

---

> "Seadog" <seadog@nunyabidness.com> wrote in message
> news:OPaFg.1869$q63.554@newssvr13.news.prodigy.com...
>
> The 91.33 driver just eliminates the "SLI not detected" bubble that pops up
> in the system tray. Known bug that was squashed with a quick patch which is
> 91.33. Yes it is beta, but shouldn't affect frame rate.
>
>

quote:

---

> HockeyTownUSA wrote:
> Good find. I don't get the bubble, but I do hear the pop sound of the
> "hardware found" variety with 91.33, that I wondered about. Since that's
> the case, then my next best hunch would be for the good drtee to roll back
> to an earlier driver instead, one that was more likely optimized for the
> GeForce4 series of cards some time ago. Doc, on the download drivers page,
> once you've selected a specific driver, you'll find a link in the left
> hand column to archived drivers. Might want to give them a shot. Of
> course, you could always get a newer card, like a 6600 GT, but either
> way's an option.
>
> -Seadog

quote:

---

>Yeah 6600 GT is a good bet. The only thing I don't get is why the hell did
>they only make those 128MB ??? Standard 6600's have 256MB, but they are
>crippled in all other respects. At least give the customer the choice to
>buy a 128MB or 256MB GT. While I think 512MB is a tad bit overkill right now
>for graphics in games, 256MB is essential.

quote:

---

>
>Yeah 6600 GT is a good bet. The only thing I don't get is why the hell did
>they only make those 128MB ??? Standard 6600's have 256MB, but they are
>crippled in all other respects. At least give the customer the choice to
>buy a 128MB or 256MB GT. While I think 512MB is a tad bit overkill right now
>for graphics in games, 256MB is essential.
>
>

quote:

---

>I bought a eVGA 6600GT/256Meg/AGP for my son as a present last
>Christmas for ~ $110. If I was buying again for the same machine, it
>would probably now be a 7600GT or 7600GS.

quote:

---

> Hi HT,
>
> "HockeyTownUSA" <cyberpilot@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> Hummmm??? Maybe you haven't looked hard enough since 6600 GT's with
> 256 MB exists since last summer, I have one from Gainward myself...
>
> /CJ
>

quote:

---

>Not for AGP. Only manufacturer I know of that did this was a second rate
>company called "Palit Microsystems". Other than that, can't find one
>anywhere.