| Author |
F4 AF: what's the consensus?
|
|
| Tim Hall 2005-07-11, 8:33 pm |
| On a scale of 1 to 10?
| |
| fstott@memphis.edu 2005-07-11, 8:33 pm |
| On Mon, 11 Jul 2005 15:06:24 -0700, Tim Hall <fakeaddress@fake.net>
wrote:
quote:
>On a scale of 1 to 10?
On a scale of 1 to 10, how old MJ's boyfriend?
| |
| James Calivar 2005-07-12, 12:33 am |
| Tim Hall wrote:
quote:
> On a scale of 1 to 10?
"It depends."
What are you looking for? Stability? 9/10. Flashy graphics? 6/10.
Deep and involving campaign? 10/10. Ease of learning? 2/10.
| |
| Greg Cisko 2005-07-12, 3:32 am |
| "James Calivar" <amheiserbush@yahoo.com.au> wrote in message
news:Y0EAe.21378$eM6.8276@newsread3.news.atl.earthlink.net...
quote:
> Tim Hall wrote:
>
> "It depends."
>
> What are you looking for? Stability? 9/10. Flashy graphics? 6/10. Deep
> and involving campaign? 10/10. Ease of learning? 2/10.
Can't you write a script to take care of the 2/10 ?
:-)
--
gcisko@hotmail.com
| |
| Greg Cisko 2005-07-12, 3:32 am |
| "Tim Hall" <fakeaddress@fake.net> wrote in message
news:v9r5d11o0qtb793jghushm9994j9ltsh5c@4ax.com...
quote:
> On a scale of 1 to 10?
I have found the game to be completely cool now. Also most
of the same controls for radar and such still work in my TM
F-22 profile so it is even better yet. The graphics surprised me.
In some ways I thought they are worse, but in reality I think they
are much better. I did not see a "bubble" parameter, and the
sky and horizon looked superb. Also the "star" effect from the
missiles is amazing. All in all I would give it a 10 actually as I
have not found anything wrong. So no reason to ding it.
--
gcisko@hotmail.com
| |
| HockeyTownUSA 2005-07-13, 12:31 am |
|
"Greg Cisko" <gcisko@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:hJOdnUk62Zlb307fRVn-qQ@comcast.com...
quote:
> "James Calivar" <amheiserbush@yahoo.com.au> wrote in message
> news:Y0EAe.21378$eM6.8276@newsread3.news.atl.earthlink.net...
>
> Can't you write a script to take care of the 2/10 ?
>
> :-)
Or use simplified options makes it 7/10.
| |
|
|
"Tim Hall" <fakeaddress@fake.net> wrote in message
news:v9r5d11o0qtb793jghushm9994j9ltsh5c@4ax.com...
quote:
> On a scale of 1 to 10?
5 or so. Sticking to 4.2, with bms myself.
|
|
|
|