quote:

---

> So who is going to buy it?
>
> http://www.lead-pursuit.com/
>
>

quote:

---

>
> "rob" <roball@xtra.co.nz> wrote in message
> news:89ube.1534$Od6.231624@news.xtra.co.nz...
>
> I'm going to pick it up! This way I could have all of the goodies on one
> disc.
>
> Thanks
>
>
>
>

quote:

---

> So who is going to buy it?
>
> http://www.lead-pursuit.com/
>
>

quote:

---

>On Wed, 27 Apr 2005 04:39:31 +1200, "rob" <roball@xtra.co.nz> wrote:
>So who is going to buy it?
>
>http://www.lead-pursuit.com/
>

quote:

---

> Already ordered it (pre) on Amazon. I have my doubts about it but
> WTH..
>
> Icer

quote:

---

>So who is going to buy it?
>
>http://www.lead-pursuit.com/
>

quote:

---

>Actually details are *less than forthcoming*

quote:

---

> I have already read that you can't "Fly Any Plane" so

quote:

---

> Actually details are *less than forthcoming* so if you need
> reassurance forget it. My takeon it is it is a release LESS than what
> is available alreadty so buy it at your own risk or wait for a verdict
> of some sort. I have already read that you can't "Fly Any Plane" so
> that in itself is a big flaw. What I WON'T do is delete any of my
> current installs to load it. I AM going to buy it as is to see what is
> going on though...
>
> Icer
>
wrote:[vbcol=seagreen]
>

quote:

---

> So who is going to buy it?
>
> http://www.lead-pursuit.com/
>

quote:

---

> So who is going to buy it?
>
> http://www.lead-pursuit.com/
>

quote:

---

> On Tue, 26 Apr 2005 21:08:38 -0400, G. Patricks
> <GPatricks@nospamforme.com> wrote:
>
>
> That's strange. Someone took a bunch of code and disappeared into a
> back room and cooked this up? Or is it just Atari trying to get some
> order to things and maybe a few bucks back?
>
>
> Doesn't phase me. F* has always been about the F16 for me. From
> Falcon, FalconAT on up. The Mig29 was cool in F3, but the F/A-18
> never did work right IMO. If they decided to leave out the others and
> just wrap everything neatly around the F-16 that's OK in my book.
>
> AFA reviews go.... if one of them talks about how nicely the game
> installs, how seamless everything is, and the ease of which you can
> get going and operate the systems then my interest will be peaked. If
> they talk about the proper procedure to start the APU, check the tire
> pressures, and the correct cleaning solution to clean the canopy
> before entering the cockpit then I will pass. I just no longer have
> that many hours in the day to dedicate to entertainment software
> titles that go over the top ape-shit for simulated reality.
>
> Not that I begrudge others how enjoy that sort of stuff More power
> to 'em.

quote:

---

> I'd much rather have a stable quality update to the F-16, which
> is what the Falcon series is all about, than try to get too carried
> away with adding multiple aircraft.

quote:

---

> Well said. I'd much rather have a stable quality update to the F-16, which
> is what the Falcon series is all about, than try to get too carried away
> with adding multiple aircraft.

quote:

---

> My biggest turn-off was that I never seemed to have a 100% functional
> version. It was a combination of my ineptitude and glitches, but as I
> began

quote:

---

> to understand better how to control the beast, I realized a lot of my
> learning curve was understanding when Falcon was at fault and not me. So
> if they can make sure the avionics are solid, I'm sold.
>

quote:

---

> "HockeyTownUSA" <magma@killspam.comcast.net> wrote in message
> news:FOSdnVZ7qMLDi-XfRVn-qA@comcast.com...
>
> Can you really say the falcon 4 deal was about stability? I did not have
> that much problem with it, but many did.
>
>
> Exactly. I still think that FF3 is as close as you can get and the Allied
> Force
> is whatever... I have see nothing here to sway that line of thinking.
>
> --
>
> gcisko@hotmail.com
>
>
>

quote:

---

> On Tue, 26 Apr 2005 21:08:38 -0400, G. Patricks
> <GPatricks@nospamforme.com> wrote:
>
>
> That's strange. Someone took a bunch of code and disappeared into a
> back room and cooked this up? Or is it just Atari trying to get some
> order to things and maybe a few bucks back?
>
>
> Doesn't phase me. F* has always been about the F16 for me. From
> Falcon, FalconAT on up. The Mig29 was cool in F3, but the F/A-18
> never did work right IMO. If they decided to leave out the others and
> just wrap everything neatly around the F-16 that's OK in my book.
>
> AFA reviews go.... if one of them talks about how nicely the game
> installs, how seamless everything is, and the ease of which you can
> get going and operate the systems then my interest will be peaked. If
> they talk about the proper procedure to start the APU, check the tire
> pressures, and the correct cleaning solution to clean the canopy
> before entering the cockpit then I will pass. I just no longer have
> that many hours in the day to dedicate to entertainment software
> titles that go over the top ape-shit for simulated reality.
>
> Not that I begrudge others how enjoy that sort of stuff More power
> to 'em.

quote:

---

> I'd much rather have a stable quality update to the F-16, which
> is what the Falcon series is all about, than try to get too carried
> away with adding multiple aircraft.

quote:

---

> I'd much rather have a stable quality update to the F-16, which
> is what the Falcon series is all about, than try to get too carried
> away with adding multiple aircraft.

quote:

---

> "HockeyTownUSA" <magma@killspam.comcast.net> wrote in message
> news:FOSdnVZ7qMLDi-XfRVn-qA@comcast.com...
>
> Can you really say the falcon 4 deal was about stability? I did not have
> that much problem with it, but many did.
>
>
> Exactly. I still think that FF3 is as close as you can get and the Allied
> Force
> is whatever... I have see nothing here to sway that line of thinking.
>
> --
>
> gcisko@hotmail.com
>
>
>