| James Calivar 2005-03-30, 7:49 am |
| "Connected" <connected@somewhere.here> wrote in message
news:ilb941h7kb9m0th5f17e975ffi6jitm590@4ax.com...
quote:
> On Fri, 25 Mar 2005 22:43:49 GMT, "James Calivar"
> <amheiserbush@yahoo.com.au> wrote:
>
>
> Ubisoft already paid the licenseing fee to use those planes, so
> someone posted here one day. And there is a way around it, make a
> plane similar but not exactly the same and just call it something
> else. I don't need to hear any more piss poor excuses for you fanbois.
LOL - if you're so disenamoured of the game, just don't play it and shut
your pie-hole already. I doubt I'm the only one here tired of hearing you
complain about a game you don't even like.
I'm not an IL2 fanbois, although I do really like the game. I have yet to
find a better one around depicting the era on such a broad scale.
I agree that 1C games could have inserted some "faux" planes but as Oleg
himself said, his group is busy working on BoB. I don't like it any more
than you do but that's the way it is. And Oleg has made it clear from the
start that the game is *his baby* - and therein lies the reason you won't
find it open-ended.
Seriously, Connected - I understand your point, but it's getting very
tiresome listening to you complain about it over such a small issue. Move
on.
|