Home > Archive > Flight simulator > February 2005 > THE SEARCH FOR WMD'S HAS ENDED. PAPADOC HAS BEEN PROVEN WRONG.





You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread. To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to this thread please [click here]

Author THE SEARCH FOR WMD'S HAS ENDED. PAPADOC HAS BEEN PROVEN WRONG.
buster

2005-01-13, 12:46 am

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/4169107.stm

A sad sad day for republicans everywhere.
For-Example

2005-01-13, 12:46 am

buster wrote:
quote:

> http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/4169107.stm
>
> A sad sad day for republicans everywhere.


Well surprise, surprise. Even still, they still needed to kick S.H.'s XXX
out of there.


Jarg

2005-01-13, 12:46 am

"buster" <buster@jupiter.net> wrote in message
news:uBiFd.11130$tF.9346@bignews6.bellsouth.net...
quote:

> http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/4169107.stm
>
> A sad sad day for republicans everywhere.


Not true, I had a great day, thanks!

Jarg


Don Burnette

2005-01-13, 12:46 am

buster wrote:
quote:

> http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/4169107.stm
>
> A sad sad day for republicans everywhere.



Ohhh lordy, not again!



--
Don Burnette

"When you decide something is impossible to do, try to stay out of the
way of the man that's doing it."


nospam@nospam.com

2005-01-13, 12:46 am

hehe...Yup WMD's not found, we are giving back Iraq to Saddam.

On the other hand what about those Mets?

PAPADOC
quote:

>http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/4169107.stm
>
>A sad sad day for republicans everywhere.


taragem72@yahoo.com

2005-01-13, 6:46 am

It's also been reported that military big-wigs are planning on working
out an exit strategy as they're realizing it's an unwinable war.
..
Tara
--
War would end if the dead could return. - Stanley Baldwin

Mr. Sylvestre

2005-01-13, 9:47 am

nospam@nospam.com wrote:
quote:

> hehe...Yup WMD's not found, we are giving back Iraq to Saddam.


Please don't. That could trigger a civil war there. Oh, wait...
quote:

> On the other hand what about those Mets?


This one is a bit cryptic for us non-americans. I take it you are
referring to the Doug Avery poem "A Black Marble Wall" ? Sadly appropriate.

http://home.earthlink.net/~dougavery/poems.html#Black

Regards,
Mr. Sylvestre
Jay Williams

2005-01-13, 5:47 pm

Doubt it.

The Mets are an Amercian sports team. It's a common expression denoting
that you follow the team and are asking how they are doing in their
competitions. It also denotes a certain comradery with the team. It would
be the same as saying "Hey, how about those Maple Leafs!" to a Canadian
hockey fan...

"Mr. Sylvestre" <MrSylvestre@worldcompany.com> wrote in message
news:cs5vkc$e3a$1@ikaria.belnet.be...
quote:

> nospam@nospam.com wrote:
>
> Please don't. That could trigger a civil war there. Oh, wait...
>
>
> This one is a bit cryptic for us non-americans. I take it you are
> referring to the Doug Avery poem "A Black Marble Wall" ? Sadly

appropriate.
quote:

>
> http://home.earthlink.net/~dougavery/poems.html#Black
>
> Regards,
> Mr. Sylvestre



Leadfoot

2005-01-13, 5:47 pm


<nospam@nospam.com> wrote in message
news:00qbu0l8cbcd91uel0q5dnvfeub0vgkarl@4ax.com...
quote:

> hehe...Yup WMD's not found, we are giving back Iraq to Saddam.


Nope probably giving it back to someone worse
quote:

>
> On the other hand what about those Mets?


The Yankees got the Big Unit :-(
quote:

>
> PAPADOC
>
>



Mr. Sylvestre

2005-01-13, 5:47 pm

Jay Williams wrote:
quote:

> Doubt it.
>
> The Mets are an Amercian sports team. It's a common expression denoting
> that you follow the team and are asking how they are doing in their
> competitions. It also denotes a certain comradery with the team. It would
> be the same as saying "Hey, how about those Maple Leafs!" to a Canadian
> hockey fan...
>


Oh, OK. I liked the poem idea because it seemed appropriate in some way,
but your explanation looks to be the right one. Oh well, I learned
something new today

Thanks!
Mr. S.
FLY135

2005-01-14, 12:48 am


Mr. Sylvestre wrote:
quote:

> Jay Williams wrote:
denoting[vbcol=seagreen]
It would[vbcol=seagreen]
Canadian[vbcol=seagreen]
>
> Oh, OK. I liked the poem idea because it seemed appropriate in some

way,
quote:

> but your explanation looks to be the right one. Oh well, I learned
> something new today


Actually it's a cliche for changing the subject. I.E. showing you are
no longer interested in the current topic.

Stockman91790@yahoo.com

2005-01-14, 12:48 am


taragem72@yahoo.com wrote:
quote:

> It's also been reported that military big-wigs are planning on

working
quote:

> out an exit strategy as they're realizing it's an unwinable war.
> .
> Tara
> --
> War would end if the dead could return. - Stanley Baldwin


we were working on an exit stategy from day 1 of the war- is that
unusual? Of course the war is winable- we just are unwilling to win it.
My formula for winning is simple- kill all terrorists. All military
convoys would pass without any US casualties if preceded by an M1 tank
that blasted any vehicle so much as in the vicinity of a convoy. I
don't care if that vehicle is filled with 15 children and 5 women (a
few old ones on crutches).
I have said this before and now again- if we will not win this war with
the overwhelming power we have, then we should leave immediately and
stop this drain of US blood in a foreign land of shit people.
We can win- as in Viet Nam, our government will not let us.
Let Bush lead a convoy, then Cheney, and so on down the line until we
have a leader that understands how to fight a war. Is kill the enemy so
hard a concept to understand? Who would say a war is pretty?

Leadfoot

2005-01-14, 12:48 am


<Stockman91790@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1105665734.723131.266580@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
quote:

>
> taragem72@yahoo.com wrote:
> working
>
> we were working on an exit stategy from day 1 of the war- is that
> unusual? Of course the war is winable- we just are unwilling to win it.
> My formula for winning is simple- kill all terrorists. All military
> convoys would pass without any US casualties if preceded by an M1 tank
> that blasted any vehicle so much as in the vicinity of a convoy. I
> don't care if that vehicle is filled with 15 children and 5 women (a
> few old ones on crutches).
> I have said this before and now again- if we will not win this war with
> the overwhelming power we have, then we should leave immediately and
> stop this drain of US blood in a foreign land of shit people.
> We can win- as in Viet Nam, our government will not let us.
> Let Bush lead a convoy, then Cheney, and so on down the line until we
> have a leader that understands how to fight a war. Is kill the enemy so
> hard a concept to understand? Who would say a war is pretty?


We are suppose to be the "Good Guys" not the XXXXing Nazi SS

Himmler would be proud of you!
quote:

>



buster

2005-01-14, 12:48 am

quote:

> we were working on an exit stategy from day 1 of the war- is that
> unusual? Of course the war is winable- we just are unwilling to win it.
> My formula for winning is simple- kill all terrorists. All military
> convoys would pass without any US casualties if preceded by an M1 tank
> that blasted any vehicle so much as in the vicinity of a convoy. I
> don't care if that vehicle is filled with 15 children and 5 women (a
> few old ones on crutches).


Wow what a great idea. Of course, you would have to hope the terrorists
werent clever enough to just leave the area.
Stockman91790@yahoo.com

2005-01-14, 12:48 am

As a Jew I am deeply offended by your reference to Himmler. As an
American , a former soldier with an honrable discharge, from a country
with the mightiest miliatary that EVER existed, I am deeply embarrased
at a daily flow of American blood from poorly equiped, rag tag
terrorists with small arms killing us at will while we are impotent to
fight them. While they attack us with great cunning without regard for
any civilized rules we continue to be killed while being the "good
guys"- it reminds me of the British during our revolutionary war. We
hit them and ran from deep cover while they stood in line with red
uniforms. We seem to have forgotten how to fight and win a war. We can
not infiltrate, we can not ambush, we can not destroy suspected
concentrations of enemy without suffering from protests. We cower in
fear that our enemy will not like us if we kill them.
We remain the good guys while our enemies hate us in larger and larger
numbers and devise ever clever methods of killing us.
If we want to be the good guys then we should all stick our head in the
sand while our enemies saw them off with long knives.
If we stopped being saints then maybe we can save our lives and country
by fighting for our lives and liberty- do you think?

James Calivar

2005-01-14, 12:48 am

"buster" <buster@jupiter.net> wrote in message
news:uBiFd.11130$tF.9346@bignews6.bellsouth.net...
quote:

> http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/4169107.stm
>
> A sad sad day for republicans everywhere.


You can't prove someone wrong by lack of something turning up yet, dumbass.
Just because the official search is off doesn't mean that they weren't there
in the first place, just not discovered.

In any case, it's largely irrelvant at this point. Iraq has been freed from
the chains of a dictator, and even though there is still a significant
amount of residual leftover from that regime, in the long run the Iraqis
will enjoy their freedom.

James


Stockman91790@yahoo.com

2005-01-14, 12:48 am

Leave the area? How clever is a "suicide bomber"? Why would they leave
the area when they can blow themselves into bite size pieces? If they
screw it up how many get a second chance? Once they get to Heaven and
go thru 70 virgins they could kill themselves again. But the idea is
enticing.

James Calivar

2005-01-14, 12:48 am

<nospam@nospam.com> wrote in message
news:00qbu0l8cbcd91uel0q5dnvfeub0vgkarl@4ax.com...
quote:

> hehe...Yup WMD's not found, we are giving back Iraq to Saddam.
>
> On the other hand what about those Mets?
>
> PAPADOC
>
>


What is sad is the fact that none of these posters has uttered a XXXXing
peep on this newsgroup in months - not since they had their respective asses
handed to them in the election. Now that they perceive some sort of tiny
vindication for their stance, they come out of the woodwork.

Welcome back, fools.


JP

2005-01-14, 12:48 am


<Stockman91790@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1105665734.723131.266580@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
quote:

>
> taragem72@yahoo.com wrote:
> working
>
> we were working on an exit stategy from day 1 of the war- is that
> unusual? Of course the war is winable- we just are unwilling to win it.
> My formula for winning is simple- kill all terrorists. All military
> convoys would pass without any US casualties if preceded by an M1 tank
> that blasted any vehicle so much as in the vicinity of a convoy. I
> don't care if that vehicle is filled with 15 children and 5 women (a
> few old ones on crutches).
> I have said this before and now again- if we will not win this war with
> the overwhelming power we have, then we should leave immediately and
> stop this drain of US blood in a foreign land of shit people.
> We can win- as in Viet Nam, our government will not let us.
> Let Bush lead a convoy, then Cheney, and so on down the line until we
> have a leader that understands how to fight a war. Is kill the enemy so
> hard a concept to understand? Who would say a war is pretty?



While your idea is off the wall, the theory behind it is not. Thats the
biggest problem in the war; we, as a nation, are not treating it as such.
Instead of crushing the enemy, we are reacting to him, trying to minimize
his effects, instead of doing what it takes for total defeat.

Like it or not, thats what winning a war takes. Anything else gives us
what we have now. I've seen lots of analogies to WW2 here in the past.
Irrelevant comparison; in that war, the entire nation was mobilized for war,
behind it, etc.

Not in this one. But it sure needs to be. This enemy requires it as much
as the Germans and Japanese did.


Leadfoot

2005-01-14, 12:48 am

This is what you want right?

http://desinroc.free.fr/anglais/chrono3/Das_Reich.html



<Stockman91790@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1105668429.064325.132130@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
quote:

> As a Jew I am deeply offended by your reference to Himmler. As an
> American , a former soldier with an honrable discharge, from a country
> with the mightiest miliatary that EVER existed, I am deeply embarrased
> at a daily flow of American blood from poorly equiped, rag tag
> terrorists with small arms killing us at will while we are impotent to
> fight them. While they attack us with great cunning without regard for
> any civilized rules we continue to be killed while being the "good
> guys"- it reminds me of the British during our revolutionary war. We
> hit them and ran from deep cover while they stood in line with red
> uniforms. We seem to have forgotten how to fight and win a war. We can
> not infiltrate, we can not ambush, we can not destroy suspected
> concentrations of enemy without suffering from protests. We cower in
> fear that our enemy will not like us if we kill them.
> We remain the good guys while our enemies hate us in larger and larger
> numbers and devise ever clever methods of killing us.
> If we want to be the good guys then we should all stick our head in the
> sand while our enemies saw them off with long knives.
> If we stopped being saints then maybe we can save our lives and country
> by fighting for our lives and liberty- do you think?
>



Leadfoot

2005-01-14, 12:48 am


"James Calivar" <amheiserbush@yahoo.com.au> wrote in message
news:TUFFd.5972$KJ2.4206@newsread3.news.atl.earthlink.net...
quote:

> "buster" <buster@jupiter.net> wrote in message
> news:uBiFd.11130$tF.9346@bignews6.bellsouth.net...
>
> You can't prove someone wrong by lack of something turning up yet,
> dumbass. Just because the official search is off doesn't mean that they
> weren't there in the first place, just not discovered.
>
> In any case, it's largely irrelvant at this point. Iraq has been freed
> from the chains of a dictator, and even though there is still a
> significant amount of residual leftover from that regime, in the long run
> the Iraqis will enjoy their freedom.


Your "long run" is likely to be twenty years of civil war. I wouldn't call
that freedom. May or may not be better than Saddam.

Stocky is in part right in that we aren't committed enough What he fails to
realize is that it's not the tactics, its the number of troops we failed to
commit to get the job done.. If we didn't have 250.000 troops to commit we
should have asked congress to add divisions to the army before invading
Iraq. Rumsfeld et al have been wanting to invade Iraq since 1998

http://tinyurl.com/7ots

So why didn't Rumsfeld ask for more divisions in 2001 when he took over as
SoD?
quote:

>
> James
>



Leadfoot

2005-01-14, 12:48 am


"James Calivar" <amheiserbush@yahoo.com.au> wrote in message
news:W3GFd.6388$C52.4179@newsread2.news.atl.earthlink.net...
quote:

> <nospam@nospam.com> wrote in message
> news:00qbu0l8cbcd91uel0q5dnvfeub0vgkarl@4ax.com...
>
> What is sad is the fact that none of these posters has uttered a XXXXing
> peep on this newsgroup in months


I thought everyone was enjoying the peace and quiet. You guys won fair and
square this time and I even gave you all congratulations.
..

- not since they had their respective asses
quote:

> handed to them in the election.


You win a football game 24-23 and you call it "they had their respective
asses
handed to them" ???


Now that they perceive some sort of tiny
quote:

> vindication for their stance, they come out of the woodwork.


I consider the recent announcement nothing that wasn't already known. It
could have been released pre-election. I wonder why?
quote:

>
> Welcome back, fools.

quote:

>
>



PAPADOC

2005-01-14, 12:48 am

Unwinnable? Wow you mean that a band of rag tag misfits blowing themselves up
can defeat the most powerful nation in the world? hehe...

What were the Soviets thinking when they amassed all those Divisions...all they
needed were a few rag tag platoons of suicide bombers and they could have won
the cold war. Wow...

The only way we lose is if we forget why we are fighting in the first place. If
we give up we lose...if we keep fighting they lose. We have kept the terrorists
completely offbalance since 9/11. Or are you thinking that they didnt want to
bomb all the major events we have had since? Republican Convention nothing not
one damn thing happened, Democratic convention nothing not one damn thing
(understandable in one sense since many of the Democrats are on Osama's side),
Super Bowls, World Series, New Years in Times square and none of those events
saw even a XXXXing loser with a bomb belt on.

They are fighting for all they are worth for the most important prize. Iraq. We
beat them there and its all downhill from there since we would roll up Syria and
Iran pretty darn quickly after that.

PAPADOC
quote:

>It's also been reported that military big-wigs are planning on working
>out an exit strategy as they're realizing it's an unwinable war.
>.
>Tara
>--
>War would end if the dead could return. - Stanley Baldwin


My Blog all about politics and the terror war.
www.papadoc.net/PinkFlamingoBar.html
James Calivar

2005-01-14, 12:48 am

"Leadfoot" <nospam@nospam.org> wrote in message
news:JZGFd.4076$nt.992@fed1read06...
quote:

>
> "James Calivar" <amheiserbush@yahoo.com.au> wrote in message
> news:TUFFd.5972$KJ2.4206@newsread3.news.atl.earthlink.net...
>
> Your "long run" is likely to be twenty years of civil war. I wouldn't
> call that freedom. May or may not be better than Saddam.
>
> Stocky is in part right in that we aren't committed enough What he fails
> to realize is that it's not the tactics, its the number of troops we
> failed to commit to get the job done.. If we didn't have 250.000 troops
> to commit we should have asked congress to add divisions to the army
> before invading Iraq.>


I agree with you there - why for example a full assault on Fallujah wasn't
made the day after the 4 contracters were killed and hung out in the open is
XXXXing beyond me. To ask the current soldiers who have been busting XXX
for almost 2 years to extend their duty is an insult and an outrage.

That said, this is all beside the point. The WMDs were (in my opinion)
there from Day 1. They were most likely moved to Syria or Jordan or Iran.
XXXX - Saddam had months to hide them. And given his sneaky background in
other venues, it's no surprise to me that he was able to cover them up.
quote:

> http://tinyurl.com/7ots
>


No thanks. I don't do TinyURL. But let me guess - NY Times? The UK
Register? Even better, maybe The Guardian?


Leadfoot

2005-01-14, 12:48 am


"James Calivar" <amheiserbush@yahoo.com.au> wrote in message
news:kBHFd.6459$C52.6441@newsread2.news.atl.earthlink.net...
quote:

> "Leadfoot" <nospam@nospam.org> wrote in message
> news:JZGFd.4076$nt.992@fed1read06...
>
> I agree with you there - why for example a full assault on Fallujah wasn't
> made the day after the 4 contracters were killed and hung out in the open
> is XXXXing beyond me. To ask the current soldiers who have been busting
> XXX for almost 2 years to extend their duty is an insult and an outrage.
>
> That said, this is all beside the point. The WMDs were (in my opinion)
> there from Day 1. They were most likely moved to Syria or Jordan or Iran.
> XXXX - Saddam had months to hide them. And given his sneaky background in
> other venues, it's no surprise to me that he was able to cover them up.
>
>
> No thanks. I don't do TinyURL. But let me guess - NY Times? The UK
> Register? Even better, maybe The Guardian?


http://www.newamericancentury.org/iraqclintonletter.htm
quote:

>
>



James Calivar

2005-01-14, 12:48 am

"Leadfoot" <nospam@nospam.org> wrote in message
news:n3IFd.4110$nt.2166@fed1read06...
quote:

>
> "James Calivar" <amheiserbush@yahoo.com.au> wrote in message
> news:kBHFd.6459$C52.6441@newsread2.news.atl.earthlink.net...
>
> http://www.newamericancentury.org/iraqclintonletter.htm
>
>
>


Out of all the people on this news group, I expected this out of you the
least. So touche for putting up an interesting link.

That said, what do you propose we do at this point? It would appear as if
the current impetus is towards holding the official elections at the end of
this month, and then getting the hell out of Dodge.


PAPADOC

2005-01-14, 6:46 am


We wont be leaving the ME anytime soon. It is the crucial battle ground in this
war. We have forced the enemy to fight and he cannot afford to lose Iraq.

After Iraq or maybe concurrently we will be addressing Iran and Syria. The ME
will be brought into the 21 century or else we all are going to go to hell.

That is a cute letter but it is also way before 9/11 after 9/11 the rules
changed.

And I would recommend you read some very intelligent analysis of the problem
here.

http://belmontclub.blogspot.com/

Just start at the top and work your way down.

Do I think that there were no mistakes made...nope. Do I believe that mistakes
are part and parcel of war? Yup. Who doesnt except those who simply wish to
leave us boarded up in our country awaiting an attack? Mistakes are made, people
die, terrific young men and women die, mothers miss their sons, dads their
daughters and all the finger pointing in the world doesnt help except to weaken
the effort. No one can beat the United States in war except the US public who
may one day start believing that nonsense that Moore and Co spew.

People like Leadfoot arent interested in looking at errors in order to better
fight the war, they are looking for errors in order to end the war. That way we
get to fight them in airliners over some city....when we discover, again, that
its impossible to play defense. They only have to get lucky once...we have to be
lucky every single time. Nah take the fight to them.

Iraq was a central battlefield, the enemy is forced to fight us, he cannot
afford to lose Iraq. This is a crucial battle for both of us.

PAPADOC
quote:

>Out of all the people on this news group, I expected this out of you the
>least. So touche for putting up an interesting link.
>
>That said, what do you propose we do at this point? It would appear as if
>the current impetus is towards holding the official elections at the end of
>this month, and then getting the hell out of Dodge.
>


My Blog all about politics and the terror war.
www.papadoc.net/PinkFlamingoBar.html
FatKat

2005-01-14, 5:48 pm


Stockman91790@yahoo.com wrote:
quote:

> As a Jew I am deeply offended by your reference to Himmler.


How's he supposed to know you're Jewish? He anwered you well -
"basically just go in and annihilate everybody" didn't work for the
Nazi's - why should it work for us?
quote:

> As an
> American , a former soldier with an honrable discharge, from a

country
quote:

> with the mightiest miliatary that EVER existed, I am deeply

embarrased
quote:

> at a daily flow of American blood from poorly equiped, rag tag
> terrorists with small arms killing us at will while we are impotent

to
quote:

> fight them.


What particular weapons system do you believe would stem that tide?
quote:

> While they attack us with great cunning without regard for
> any civilized rules we continue to be killed while being the "good
> guys"-


A lot of people question whether we are the good guys. The best things
that many say is that our guys are honorably doing a job they were
ignobly assigned to.
quote:

> it reminds me of the British during our revolutionary war. We
> hit them and ran from deep cover while they stood in line with red
> uniforms.


Our guys don't stand in line, and they don't wear red uniforms. What
is your point?
quote:

> We seem to have forgotten how to fight and win a war.


How generous that you've included yourself in this mass amnesia. BTW,
seeming how we had to have known something before we could forget it,
when did we ever know how to fight and win a war such as the one we've
found ourselves embroiled in?
quote:

> We can not infiltrate, we can not ambush, we can not destroy

suspected
quote:

> concentrations of enemy without suffering from protests.


I thought we reduced Fallujah to rubble - even cut off the exit points.
I heard little protest that was directed specifically to our actions
in Fallujah - though that might change now that citizens are slowly
creeping back and seeing how bad their homes were pounded. In other
words, it's not like our guys have been standing in rows, wearing
garish red jackets and carrying only single-shot rifles.
quote:

> We cower in fear that our enemy will not like us if we kill them.


Actually, we cower in irony that we'll kill the people we've claimed to
liberate without doing much to stop the people we're liberating them
from.
quote:

> We remain the good guys while our enemies hate us in larger and

larger
quote:

> numbers and devise ever clever methods of killing us.


Do you hate being the "good guy"? Apparently so if it comes at the
cost of victory; yet since you've offered nothing but hyperbole to map
the path to victory, all that you can guarantee is that we'll become
the bad guys.
quote:

> If we want to be the good guys then we should all stick our head in

the
quote:

> sand while our enemies saw them off with long knives.


Is this what we did when we invaded Iraq? I presume that we were the
"good guys" then. Is this how you describe the actions of our troops?
How many returning vets have you bounced that characterization off of?
quote:

> If we stopped being saints then maybe we can save our lives and

country
quote:

> by fighting for our lives and liberty- do you think?


I'd think harder if you had the courage to actually say what you think
we should do - bomb houses even if they housed children young enough to
be your own; take out whole cities, establish buffer zones along the
borders with Iran and Syria, and possibly within Iran and Syria, take
out leaders who may or may not be behind the violence, use torture
against people who may or not have had the chance to prove their
innocence (putting aside the whole innocent until proven guilty thing),
and most important of all, maintaining a huge military force in Iraq
that is poorly equipped and undermanned despite its size. Now, you may
think that I'm stridently anti-war, and that I'd ignore the crucial
need to engage in the gritty tactics I;ve outlined above - however
that;s not true. I like to think I'm as amenable to the next guy to
deliberate on "desperate measures for dire circumstances" issues.
However, I can't do that when all you've done is preach in such vague
hyperbole that you've insulated yourself from even needing to
understand what horrors must be unleashed to realize it.

FatKat

2005-01-14, 5:48 pm


PAPADOC wrote:
quote:

> Unwinnable? Wow you mean that a band of rag tag misfits blowing

themselves up
quote:

> can defeat the most powerful nation in the world? hehe...


They don't have to defeat all of us, merely defeat those of us actually
stationed in Iraq.
quote:

> What were the Soviets thinking when they amassed all those

Divisions...all they
quote:

> needed were a few rag tag platoons of suicide bombers and they could

have won
quote:

> the cold war. Wow...


It's different when you're using suicide bombers on foreign soil versus
your own. If you're the (how can I be PC about this) entering force,
then you can always leave. However, use of suicide forces against the
people who pretty much believe that they live in the country where
they're being exploded - that's a different kettle of fish (or of
semtex) entirely. Where are they supposed to run?
quote:

> The only way we lose is if we forget why we are fighting in the first

place.

As a dedicated fence-sitter, what are we fighting for 1st, middle, any
and last place?
quote:

> If we give up we lose...if we keep fighting they lose.


Since we've kept fighting, that must mean that they are losing. Do we
have any other sign that they are losing?
quote:

> We have kept the terrorists completely offbalance since 9/11.


Except for those that have killed over a thousand of our guys, killed
all those civilians in Spain, and have managed to drape us all in a web
of security measures of dubious value.
quote:

> Or are you thinking that they didnt want to bomb all the major events

we have had since?

I'm thinking that they didn't want to bomb us during any of those major
events. These guys were smart enough to see how much sympathy we got
after 9/11, and that must have been one of the few faults they had with
an op that killed 3,000 people - and figured that they could get more
mileage against us by letting other people for what were supposedly our
sins.
quote:

> Republican Convention nothing not one damn thing happened,
> Democratic convention nothing not one damn thing


Do we have the casualty figures for soldiers and civilians in Iraq
during the weeks before, after & during the conventions?
quote:

> (understandable in one sense since many of the Democrats are on

Osama's side),
quote:

> Super Bowls, World Series, New Years in Times square and none of

those events
quote:

> saw even a XXXXing loser with a bomb belt on.


Haven't you watched any TV since the invasion? Terrorism doesn't go
for the big op anymore. They've gone the reality TV route.
quote:

> They are fighting for all they are worth for the most important

prize. Iraq. We
quote:

> beat them there and its all downhill from there since we would roll

up Syria and
quote:

> Iran pretty darn quickly after that.


With unarmored HumVee's? With 50 year-old reservists who had to be
dragooned into service because they couldn't read the fine-print of
their discharge papers? With soldiers who had to scavenge Republican
Guard armories because nobody thought they'd need their own M-16's?
Just who is it you want going downhill?

noone@nowhere.com

2005-01-15, 12:48 am

On 13 Jan 2005 18:07:09 -0800, Stockman91790@yahoo.com wrote:
quote:

>- do you think?

I'm thinking you're an idiot.
no@nowhere.com

2005-01-15, 12:48 am

On Fri, 14 Jan 2005 02:13:07 GMT, "James Calivar"
<amheiserbush@yahoo.com.au> wrote:
quote:

>"buster" <buster@jupiter.net> wrote in message
>news:uBiFd.11130$tF.9346@bignews6.bellsouth.net...
>
>You can't prove someone wrong by lack of something turning up yet, dumbass.
>Just because the official search is off doesn't mean that they weren't there
>in the first place, just not discovered.


Denial is a wonderful thing.
quote:

>
>In any case, it's largely irrelvant at this point. Iraq has been freed from
>the chains of a dictator, and even though there is still a significant
>amount of residual leftover from that regime, in the long run the Iraqis
>will enjoy their freedom.


Maybe in 10 or 15 years they may have something that looks like
freedom. GW XXXXed up that country in a major way.

Oh did anyone see the report from the CIA think tank (hmmm) today that
says Iraq has "Become a terrorist magnet and training ground"
replacing Afghanistan and giving them first hand knowledge and
experience.

So good old GW attacked a country that didn't have terrorist, didn't
have WMD didn't have atomic weapons didn't have anything to do with
9/11and turned it into a terrorist training ground. And to think he
did all for the people of Iraq (well the ones he doesn't kill)

What guy !
quote:

>
>James
>


no@nowhere.com

2005-01-15, 12:48 am

On Fri, 14 Jan 2005 04:08:48 GMT, "James Calivar"
<amheiserbush@yahoo.com.au> wrote:
quote:

>That said, this is all beside the point. The WMDs were (in my opinion)
>there from Day 1.

You opinion isn't worth sh*t.
EVERY report that has come out states very clearly their were NONE.
Start facing reality
no@nowhere.com

2005-01-15, 12:48 am

On Fri, 14 Jan 2005 02:24:54 GMT, "James Calivar"
<amheiserbush@yahoo.com.au> wrote:
quote:

><nospam@nospam.com> wrote in message
>news:00qbu0l8cbcd91uel0q5dnvfeub0vgkarl@4ax.com...
>
>What is sad is the fact that none of these posters has uttered a XXXXing
>peep on this newsgroup in months - not since they had their respective asses
>handed to them in the election. Now that they perceive some sort of tiny
>vindication for their stance, they come out of the woodwork.
>
>Welcome back, fools.

You voted for him not me.
Fool.
IMO he started this war so that people like you could feel some sort
of vindication for 9./11 and your vote.

You fell for it hook line an sinker.


quote:

>


Jarg

2005-01-15, 6:49 am

"buster" <buster@jupiter.net> wrote in message
news:uBiFd.11130$tF.9346@bignews6.bellsouth.net...
quote:

> http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/4169107.stm
>
> A sad sad day for republicans everywhere.


Not true, I had a great day, thanks!

Jarg


David CL Francis

2005-01-27, 6:18 pm

On Wed, 26 Jan 2005 at 13:58:06 in message
<1tzm0x2qyy3z8$.1nv28imrz5oyq$.dlg@40tude.net>, Bret Ripley
<ripley@olywa.net> wrote:
quote:

>On or about 1/26/2005 4:17:27 AM, AM <SCTUSER@comcast.net> said:

[Snip]
quote:

>

I despise many European 'leaders' myself but 'vile scum' is perhaps a
little harsher than I would use! However, devious and far too 'clever'
for British politicians many of them are. Our leaders have been totally
outmanoeuvred by the EU leaders but some have collaborated with their
machinations as well.

I dislike generalisations about whole populations but I personally do
not support our present Leaders in the 'New' Labour Party but sadly many
of my countryman still do. I hate the European Union but not Europeans
and Europe in general.

I am glad to hear that you don't feel quite so badly about England
(being English myself ) but do you include the Scots, Welsh and Northern
Irish in that or not?[vbcol=seagreen]
>
>That's OK -- "proper" Englishmen don't consider themselves European,
>either.
>

I am not sure there as many of us left as there once were! But you are
right we did not consider ourselves to be Europeans even though there is
much across the channel that we have always admired. That's why so many
of the British have moved house to Spain and France (not to mention that
housing is cheaper there as well!)
[vbcol=seagreen]

Greed, morality and ethics have always had their ups and downs but what
is most lacking nowadays is personal integrity, and the acceptance of
responsibility. Like a Shakespeare character said,

" This above all: to thine own self be true,
And it must follow, as the night the day,
Thou canst not then be false to any man."

(I hope I have that right!) -

--
David CL Francis
David CL Francis

2005-02-01, 12:24 pm

On Wed, 26 Jan 2005 at 13:58:06 in message
<1tzm0x2qyy3z8$.1nv28imrz5oyq$.dlg@40tude.net>, Bret Ripley
<ripley@olywa.net> wrote:
quote:

>On or about 1/26/2005 4:17:27 AM, AM <SCTUSER@comcast.net> said:

[Snip]
quote:

>

I despise many European 'leaders' myself but 'vile scum' is perhaps a
little harsher than I would use! However, devious and far too 'clever'
for British politicians many of them are. Our leaders have been totally
outmanoeuvred by the EU leaders but some have collaborated with their
machinations as well.

I dislike generalisations about whole populations but I personally do
not support our present Leaders in the 'New' Labour Party but sadly many
of my countryman still do. I hate the European Union but not Europeans
and Europe in general.

I am glad to hear that you don't feel quite so badly about England
(being English myself ) but do you include the Scots, Welsh and Northern
Irish in that or not?[vbcol=seagreen]
>
>That's OK -- "proper" Englishmen don't consider themselves European,
>either.
>

I am not sure there as many of us left as there once were! But you are
right we did not consider ourselves to be Europeans even though there is
much across the channel that we have always admired. That's why so many
of the British have moved house to Spain and France (not to mention that
housing is cheaper there as well!)
[vbcol=seagreen]

Greed, morality and ethics have always had their ups and downs but what
is most lacking nowadays is personal integrity, and the acceptance of
responsibility. Like a Shakespeare character said,

" This above all: to thine own self be true,
And it must follow, as the night the day,
Thou canst not then be false to any man."

(I hope I have that right!) -

--
David CL Francis
Known12

2005-02-07, 8:06 pm

EVERY report that has come out states very clearly their were NONE.
Start facing reality>>>>

its interesting the how people so easily will becomes a criminal defense
attorney for the likes of saddam.this war was the biggest telegraphed punch in
history.saddam knew what the issue was. and like any drug dealer who has a drug
house, if you are tipped off there is a police raid to be coming you clean
house.

not ONE test tube of anthrax was found, not ONE pallet.that is more telling
than anything. its like a crime scene scrubbed clean.

and yet there are creepy types who trip overthemselves with HA HA he didnt have
any.....now who is the delusional one?
even in the first gulf war he sent his expensive planes to his hated enemy.
thats shows a modus operandi, that he would have no problem transfering things.
Copyright 2003 - 2008 gamesreviews.net Software forum  PC Hardware reviews