| Author |
Terrorism reduced to a nuisance?
|
|
| Don Burnette 2004-10-18, 5:50 pm |
| http://www.newsmax.com/archives/ic/.../11/84148.shtml
ROTFLMAO.
Kerry wants to see terrorism reduced to where it is " just a nuisance".
What the hell does he consider a nuisance? Is there a limit to how many
innocents are slaughtered to where it is just a nuisance??
Unbelievable! I'm beginning to think Kerry is just plain stupid. I think
all Bush has to do to win this election is let Kerry self destruct  .
--
Don Burnette
| |
| James Calivar 2004-10-18, 5:50 pm |
|
"Fcuk U" <g.@heav.de> wrote in message
news:vV3bd.9$B63.5@newsfe5-win.ntli.net...
quote:
>
> collateral damage breeds hatred! Did we bulldoze the family home of the
> Oklahoma bomber?
>
No, because he was caught, dumbass - he didn't go out with the 268 people he
killed. Now he's going to pay with his life. If the Israelis could catch
the bastards that bomb shopping malls, hospitals, restaurants, etc. then
they would have to need to bulldoze homes, just hang them in public.
| |
| James Calivar 2004-10-18, 5:50 pm |
| "Fcuk U" <g.@heav.de> wrote in message
news:Jbcbd.94$Bk6.2@newsfe3-gui.ntli.net...
quote:
> James Calivar wrote:
people he[vbcol=seagreen]
catch[vbcol=seagreen]
> They've already been blown to pits you XXXX-wit. No parent brings up a
> child to do that! You XXXXing people make me puke. It's like this is the
> rotten core of our country and I've just bitten into it!
You really are as stupid as your name suggests. Take a look:
http://www.israelnewsagency.com/pal...dren120314.html
| |
| Fcuk U 2004-10-18, 5:50 pm |
| Simon Robbins wrote:
quote:
> "Don Burnette" <d.burnette@clothes.comcast.net> wrote in message
> news:5JmdnXZuhrY1Y_bcRVn-vg@giganews.com...
>
>
>
> Well, $300Billion could have been spent on domestic policing, traffic
> safety, cancer research, etc. and saved more lives. But people dying
> needlessly in America is already "just a nuisance", so why should overseas
> terrorism be any different?
>
> The only sure thing about the current mass overseas deployment and
> pre-emptive wars is that it's not going to stop terrorism. It's laughable
> that anyone thinks it will. It'll just focus those American (and British,
> etc.) deaths onto people who're paid to die for their country and have it
> happen on somebody else's soil. But that's fine because you can ban the
> media from showing those coffins coming home and tell eveyone in front of
> their TVs that the world's safer.
>
> Si
>
>
well said.
| |
|
| "Fcuk U" <g.@heav.de> wrote in message
news:Jbcbd.94$Bk6.2@newsfe3-gui.ntli.net...
quote:
> They've already been blown to pits you XXXX-wit. No parent brings up a
> child to do that! You XXXXing people make me puke. It's like this is the
> rotten core of our country and I've just bitten into it!
Ready to eat your words? I cannot believe anyone could be so poorly
informed about this subject:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/mi...ast/2071561.stm
Jarg
P.S. Your insults prove the weakness of your arguments.
| |
| Bret Ripley 2004-10-20, 12:48 am |
| On or about 10/12/2004 8:56:32 AM, Don Burnette
<d.burnette@clothes.comcast.net> said:
quote:
> http://www.newsmax.com/archives/ic/.../11/84148.shtml
>
> ROTFLMAO.
>
> Kerry wants to see terrorism reduced to where it is " just a nuisance".
Interesting parallel quote --
From September 5, 2002:
"Can we win the war on terrorism? Yes, I think we can, in the sense that we
can win the war on organized crime. There is going to be no peace treaty on
the battleship Missouri in the war on terrorism, but we can break its back
so that it is only a horrible nuisance and not a paralyzing influence on
our societies." -- General Brent Scowcroft, national security adviser to
President George H. W. Bush
http://www.usip.org/events/2002/america/scowcroft.html
Bret
----== Posted via webservertalk.com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.webservertalk.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! >100,000 Newsgroups
---= East/West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---
| |
| Fcuk U 2004-10-20, 12:48 am |
| Jarg wrote:
quote:
> "Fcuk U" <g.@heav.de> wrote in message
> news:Jbcbd.94$Bk6.2@newsfe3-gui.ntli.net...
>
>
>
>
> Ready to eat your words? I cannot believe anyone could be so poorly
> informed about this subject:
> http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/mi...ast/2071561.stm
>
> Jarg
>
> P.S. Your insults prove the weakness of your arguments.
>
>
" The Israeli army has released a picture it says was found..."
you cant
| |
| James Calivar 2004-10-20, 12:48 am |
|
"Fcuk U" <g.@heav.de> wrote in message
news:M0fbd.1470$8r6.684@newsfe5-gui.ntli.net...
quote:
>
> XXXXing idiot
Ahh, a personal insult - the hallmark of someone who can't prove his point
in an argument.
| |
| James Calivar 2004-10-20, 12:48 am |
| "Fcuk U" <g.@heav.de> wrote in message
news:dogbd.1319$vr3.342@newsfe1-win.ntli.net...
quote:
> Jarg wrote:
the[vbcol=seagreen]
which[vbcol=seagreen]
plenty[vbcol=seagreen]
children[vbcol=seagreen]
> "Our correspondent says there is no way to independently confirm that
> the picture is authentic."
>
> or
>
> "However, British broadcaster Sky News has reported an unnamed member of
> the child's family as saying that dressing the infant baby as a bomber
> was "just a joke"."
>
> take your pick. You're wrong either way.
Once again, you confuse lack of proof that something is what it appears to
be as proof that something is not how at appears. It's the same argument
being made that since no WMDs have been found in Iraq, that they never
existed.
Lack of independent confirmation on the authenticity of the picture does not
mean that it is not authentic. And what did you expect the family member to
say - that it *wasn't* a joke? The very fact that the photo was taken at
all is quite telling of the mindset of the typical Palestinian. Behind
every joke there is a hint of truth, and in this case I'd say it's pretty
obvious that even if it was done in jest that the underlying intent of the
photo was to encourage the validation of suicide bombings.
Also from the same article:
"Hamas has been known to organise public rallies in which young children
stage mock-ups of famous attacks against Israel. Recently a group re-enacted
the lynching of two Israeli soldiers in Ramallah, in which a small girl had
her hands painted red to show the blood of the soldiers...opinion polls
conducted in Palestinian areas show a majority of people favour suicide
bombings against Israeli civilians as a tactic to liberate land occupied by
Israel."
What do you think of those words?
| |
| James Calivar 2004-10-20, 12:48 am |
| "Fcuk U" <g.@heav.de> wrote in message
news:Eqgbd.1321$vr3.582@newsfe1-win.ntli.net...
quote:
> James Calivar wrote:
>
point[vbcol=seagreen]
> which is of course impossible when dealing with an idiot
Look in the mirror, little man. Tell me what you see.
| |
| James Calivar 2004-10-20, 12:48 am |
|
"Fcuk U" <g.@heav.de> wrote in message
news:1Dgbd.394$jj6.364@newsfe4-gui.ntli.net...
quote:
> James Calivar wrote:
>
a[vbcol=seagreen]
to[vbcol=seagreen]
argument[vbcol=seagreen]
>
> I'm not saying they never existed.
>
> Lack of proof is just that, it means something cannot be confirmed.
>
> Please don't serve on a jury or have kids.
Too late - I've already done both. HA HA HA. And come to think of it, I've
got another kid on the way, and just coincidentally I'm up for jury duty at
the end of this month. HA HA HA!!!
So do you claim that the picture was a fake, or a joke?
And what do you have to say about the rest of the article?
Splitting hairs like you do does nothing to change the fact that
Palestinians have long engaged in a culture of terrorism. Whether the
indoctrination into that mindset begins when they are 18 months old or 8
years old is pretty inconsequential.
| |
|
|
| Bret Ripley 2004-10-20, 6:46 am |
| On or about 10/13/2004 7:39:44 PM, bp <none@comcast.net> said:
quote:
> On Wed, 13 Oct 2004 19:06:20 GMT, Fcuk U <g.@heav.de> wrote:
>
>
> BING!
Oi! That's a super sekrit space-sim convention, that is. You'll be giving
away the secret handshake, next. Splitter.
Bret
----== Posted via webservertalk.com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.webservertalk.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! >100,000 Newsgroups
---= East/West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---
| |
| Simon Robbins 2004-10-20, 9:46 am |
| "Don Burnette" <d.burnette@clothes.comcast.net> wrote in message
news:5JmdnXZuhrY1Y_bcRVn-vg@giganews.com...
quote:
> http://www.newsmax.com/archives/ic/.../11/84148.shtml
> What the hell does he consider a nuisance? Is there a limit to how many
> innocents are slaughtered to where it is just a nuisance??
Well, $300Billion could have been spent on domestic policing, traffic
safety, cancer research, etc. and saved more lives. But people dying
needlessly in America is already "just a nuisance", so why should overseas
terrorism be any different?
The only sure thing about the current mass overseas deployment and
pre-emptive wars is that it's not going to stop terrorism. It's laughable
that anyone thinks it will. It'll just focus those American (and British,
etc.) deaths onto people who're paid to die for their country and have it
happen on somebody else's soil. But that's fine because you can ban the
media from showing those coffins coming home and tell eveyone in front of
their TVs that the world's safer.
Si
| |
| Fcuk U 2004-10-24, 12:46 am |
| Simon Robbins wrote:
quote:
> "Don Burnette" <d.burnette@clothes.comcast.net> wrote in message
> news:5JmdnXZuhrY1Y_bcRVn-vg@giganews.com...
>
>
>
> Well, $300Billion could have been spent on domestic policing, traffic
> safety, cancer research, etc. and saved more lives. But people dying
> needlessly in America is already "just a nuisance", so why should overseas
> terrorism be any different?
>
> The only sure thing about the current mass overseas deployment and
> pre-emptive wars is that it's not going to stop terrorism. It's laughable
> that anyone thinks it will. It'll just focus those American (and British,
> etc.) deaths onto people who're paid to die for their country and have it
> happen on somebody else's soil. But that's fine because you can ban the
> media from showing those coffins coming home and tell eveyone in front of
> their TVs that the world's safer.
>
> Si
>
>
well said.
|
|
|
|