Home > Archive > Flight simulator > October 2004 > Bombing question





You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread. To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to this thread please [click here]

Author Bombing question
Bee

2004-10-24, 6:46 am

Some of us have been talking about a recent video clip of an air strike on a
group of people in a town. While the pilot could zoom in on the people,
it's a little hard to tell if they're armed or not. So how did the pilot
decide to attack them? This question got me to wondering how pilots know
where to drop their ordance. I came up with this list (based on some
reading that I've done over the years) of 4 methods that pilots use to
attack a target. Does any one have a better list?


I'm guessing that pilots only drop ordance when:

1. They are assigned a kill zone. Any thing found in it is free to fire
on. I believe kill zones are mainly used in open country where civilians
are not normally found; so I doubt this was the case in this video it
appears to be in a city.

2. Ground forces have a radio link with the pilot and they coordinate
bombing.
Ground forces attempt to ensure pilot knows where they are and where the
threat is at before bombing. The ground forces may even have laser
designators with them

3. AWACS provides info to pilot on threat to take out and is vectored to
the target.

4. PreMission planning: the pilot is given a briefing where targets are
shown to him. Maps, photos, videos,...

5. Another aircraft has ID a threat. Such as a spotter plane.

6. ???

BTW two excellent books on US combat missions over Iraq during Desert Storm
are "Strike Eagle" and "A10 Warthog".

And here's the video clip for those that haven't seen it (the site states
that FAC ID the targets)
http://www.jenmartinez.com/mt/archives/2004_07.php


MikeG

2004-10-26, 6:46 am

In article <q2zdd.13057$sO5.6823@fe1.texas.rr.com>, Bee@no.spam.com
says...
quote:

> Some of us have been talking about a recent video clip of an air strike on a
> group of people in a town. While the pilot could zoom in on the people,
> it's a little hard to tell if they're armed or not. So how did the pilot
> decide to attack them? This question got me to wondering how pilots know
> where to drop their ordance. I came up with this list (based on some
> reading that I've done over the years) of 4 methods that pilots use to
> attack a target. Does any one have a better list?
>
>
> I'm guessing that pilots only drop ordance when:
>
> 1. They are assigned a kill zone. Any thing found in it is free to fire
> on. I believe kill zones are mainly used in open country where civilians
> are not normally found; so I doubt this was the case in this video it
> appears to be in a city.
>
> 2. Ground forces have a radio link with the pilot and they coordinate
> bombing.
> Ground forces attempt to ensure pilot knows where they are and where the
> threat is at before bombing. The ground forces may even have laser
> designators with them
>
> 3. AWACS provides info to pilot on threat to take out and is vectored to
> the target.
>
> 4. PreMission planning: the pilot is given a briefing where targets are
> shown to him. Maps, photos, videos,...
>
> 5. Another aircraft has ID a threat. Such as a spotter plane.
>
> 6. ???
>
> BTW two excellent books on US combat missions over Iraq during Desert Storm
> are "Strike Eagle" and "A10 Warthog".
>
> And here's the video clip for those that haven't seen it (the site states
> that FAC ID the targets)
> http://www.jenmartinez.com/mt/archives/2004_07.php
>
>
>


6 - LBJ and R. McNamara decided it was safer to bomb a village rather
then take a chance on upsetting someone who was really shooting at us or
upsetting the people suppling them weapons and advisors.


--
MikeG
Heirloom Woods
www.heirloom-woods.net
mikeg@heirloom-woods.net
Busy

2004-10-26, 6:46 am

quote:

>6. ???


The next criteria is to have all the pilots all issued methamphetamine
(speed) but since it is from the Military, that means it is safe.
While they are strung out have them fly over some Canadians. No
worries, worst you get held accountable for and you get kicked out of
the Military and go work for FedEx making $120,000 /yr. Yea haaa.


Nats

2004-10-26, 9:46 am

"HockeyTownUSA" <magma@killspam.comcast.net> wrote in message
news:zPudnfRIuLTFGOrcRVn-2A@comcast.com...
quote:

> More than likely it is a combination. Intelligence states a group of
> terrorists are located at X, Y, Z. Special Forces investigate and confirm.
> Pilots are informed when they exit the buildings, and then "BLAM!"
> Surgical strikes are quite impressive. Despite all the bitching about
> casualties, these places are very violent, and civilian casualities are
> really at a minimum if you compare it with any other war in the past. The
> US has not intent on killing innocent civilians. Unfortunately there are
> casualties of war, but one can only hope that in the end it was worth the
> civilian and military lives sacrificed.
>
> I love combat aircraft and other military technology and the simulations
> of them, but would sacrifice that if we didn't have such angst and
> violence surrounding us throughout the world.


I disagree that the pilot knew when the people would exit the building. It
was obvious from the video that he had targetted a house in the city and had
a laser guided bomb on the way. He changed the course of the bomb at the
last minute to take out a load of people massing in the street in front of
the house. He asked for confirmation to do this from the FAC aircraft and
they gave the confirmation. Ground based troops wouldnt normally have
contact with pilots directly and probably wouldnt be able to see the people
on the ground massing. However the confirmation may have come from a Forward
Observer on the ground who could see the people.

I certainly hope this was the case becuase Im sure that neither a FAC
aircraft nor regular troops would have been able to give such a confirmation
at such a last minute. However having a FO in a town like that would be
extremely dangerous and not very likely. Therefore I suspect the pilot got
confimation from a FAC aircraft and that the FAC pilot based his decision on
the fact that they apparently came out of the house which was not by any
means certain from the video.

Its worrying to me that decisions on life and death of hundred of people can
be made in that way even to protect ground troops. Im sure ground troops
would have been able to deal with the threat if it became apparent.

--
Regards
Nats

"It's life, Jim, but not as we know it."


---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.779 / Virus Database: 526 - Release Date: 19/10/2004


KIRBY325

2004-10-27, 12:47 am

question.
was that plane flying so high that the people on the ground had no idea it was
even there when it released its bombs or do you think they are so used to our
planes flying overhead that they didnt think it was doing anything out of the
ordinary?
amazing how far they can zoom in video wise.thats what I call a surgical
strike, nailing a group of people walking.incredible.
HockeyTownUSA

2004-10-27, 12:47 am


"Bee" <Bee@no.spam.com> wrote in message
news:q2zdd.13057$sO5.6823@fe1.texas.rr.com...
quote:

> Some of us have been talking about a recent video clip of an air strike on
> a
> group of people in a town. While the pilot could zoom in on the people,
> it's a little hard to tell if they're armed or not. So how did the pilot
> decide to attack them? This question got me to wondering how pilots know
> where to drop their ordance. I came up with this list (based on some
> reading that I've done over the years) of 4 methods that pilots use to
> attack a target. Does any one have a better list?
>
>
> I'm guessing that pilots only drop ordance when:
>
> 1. They are assigned a kill zone. Any thing found in it is free to
> fire
> on. I believe kill zones are mainly used in open country where civilians
> are not normally found; so I doubt this was the case in this video it
> appears to be in a city.
>
> 2. Ground forces have a radio link with the pilot and they coordinate
> bombing.
> Ground forces attempt to ensure pilot knows where they are and where the
> threat is at before bombing. The ground forces may even have laser
> designators with them
>
> 3. AWACS provides info to pilot on threat to take out and is vectored to
> the target.
>
> 4. PreMission planning: the pilot is given a briefing where targets
> are
> shown to him. Maps, photos, videos,...
>
> 5. Another aircraft has ID a threat. Such as a spotter plane.
>
> 6. ???
>
> BTW two excellent books on US combat missions over Iraq during Desert
> Storm
> are "Strike Eagle" and "A10 Warthog".
>
> And here's the video clip for those that haven't seen it (the site states
> that FAC ID the targets)
> http://www.jenmartinez.com/mt/archives/2004_07.php
>
>



More than likely it is a combination. Intelligence states a group of
terrorists are located at X, Y, Z. Special Forces investigate and confirm.
Pilots are informed when they exit the buildings, and then "BLAM!" Surgical
strikes are quite impressive. Despite all the bitching about casualties,
these places are very violent, and civilian casualities are really at a
minimum if you compare it with any other war in the past. The US has not
intent on killing innocent civilians. Unfortunately there are casualties of
war, but one can only hope that in the end it was worth the civilian and
military lives sacrificed.

I love combat aircraft and other military technology and the simulations of
them, but would sacrifice that if we didn't have such angst and violence
surrounding us throughout the world.


bp

2004-10-27, 12:47 am

On Thu, 21 Oct 2004 11:26:48 +0100, "Nats"
<nstutt@nstutt.freeserve.co.uk> wrote:
quote:

>"HockeyTownUSA" <magma@killspam.comcast.net> wrote in message
>news:zPudnfRIuLTFGOrcRVn-2A@comcast.com...
>
>I disagree that the pilot knew when the people would exit the building. It
>was obvious from the video that he had targetted a house in the city and had
>a laser guided bomb on the way. He changed the course of the bomb at the
>last minute to take out a load of people massing in the street in front of
>the house. He asked for confirmation to do this from the FAC aircraft and
>they gave the confirmation. Ground based troops wouldnt normally have
>contact with pilots directly and probably wouldnt be able to see the people
>on the ground massing. However the confirmation may have come from a Forward
>Observer on the ground who could see the people.
>
>I certainly hope this was the case becuase Im sure that neither a FAC
>aircraft nor regular troops would have been able to give such a confirmation
>at such a last minute. However having a FO in a town like that would be
>extremely dangerous and not very likely. Therefore I suspect the pilot got
>confimation from a FAC aircraft and that the FAC pilot based his decision on
>the fact that they apparently came out of the house which was not by any
>means certain from the video.
>
>Its worrying to me that decisions on life and death of hundred of people can
>be made in that way even to protect ground troops. Im sure ground troops
>would have been able to deal with the threat if it became apparent.


Psst... the aircraft "support" the ground troops. They don't just
watch them get attacked.
Copyright 2003 - 2008 gamesreviews.net Software forum  PC Hardware reviews