| Werehatrack 2005-04-25, 8:41 pm |
| On 25 Apr 2005 01:21:16 -0700, "treesy" <treesy2@hotmail.com> wrote:
quote:
>
>Werehatrack wrote:
>
>Another point is that, because the guy isn't a member of this group,
>his e-mail adress is in plain sight. How about we reply to his spam
>personally??
To an email address that will not be active for more than a few hours
after the spam run begins and will be clogged for that short period
with both spam and irate tirades entreating the spammer to stop...none
of which the spammer will read? There's no point.
--
Typoes are a feature, not a bug.
Some gardening required to reply via email.
Words processed in a facility that contains nuts.
|