|
Home > Archive > Sony playstation2 > October 2005 > Atheists and Samantha Runnion
You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread.
To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to
this thread please [click here]
| Author |
Atheists and Samantha Runnion
|
|
| ugottarubmetherightway@hotmail.com 2005-10-19, 7:33 pm |
| I've been reading some posts about Samantha Runnion over at
alt.atheism, which makes for some very entertaining reading:
http://groups.google.com/group/alt....d992dc8a2323446
Atheists are people who don't believe in God. They say there's no
afterlive, and you cease to exist when you die. With that in mind, I
wonder at the rage atheists express over Alejandro Avila and his murder
of Samantha Runnion, or their rage at any other killer. What if someone
wanted to rape and murder a seven year old girl? Sure, you might be
able to say it's morally wrong. But what does that matter? We are all
going to face the horror of oblivion one day. One day when our bodies
die, that will be it... we will cease to exist. Hitler, Stalin, Pol
Pot, Mao, Genghis Khan, Madeline Albrecht, Janet Reno, and Hillary
Clinton all faced or will face the exact same fate that happened to
Jesus christ, Mother Theresa and Ghandi. Atheists tell us that no
matter how morally good you are, you will face the exact same end
result as the worst child molestor that ever lived. So what's the point
of being good? You won't be rewarded for it in the afterlife. And you
won't be punished in the afterlife for your evil deeds. Why can't
someone go out and rape little girls and bash their skulls in
afterward? Why shouldn't they do that? Ultimately, the exact same thing
would happen to them if they didn't. Living a good life as a law
abiding citizen that cares about others will earn you the same result
as someone who enjoys inflicting pain on others.
I think the main lesson atheism teaches is that good and evil doesn't
matter, evil will never be punished, and the righteous will never be
rewarded. There's no reason to do good and help your fellow human
beings, and there's no reason why child molestors and murderers
shouldn't do what they do.
| |
|
| Eeeeeyaeahyouradickhead. Maybe ifyourubmetherightway I might change my
mind.
PLONK.
| |
| Jamal Bernhard 2005-10-19, 7:33 pm |
| ugottarubmetherightway@hotmail.com wrote:
quote:
> So what's the point
> of being good? You won't be rewarded for it in the afterlife.
If the only reason you do good is to be rewarded for it, then you are a
truly sad person, regardless of whether or not there's an afterlife.
By the way, it's possible to be an Atheist (in the sense of not
believing in a Judeo-Christian God) and still believe in an afterlife.
| |
| Jordan 2005-10-19, 11:30 pm |
| "Atheists tell us that no matter how morally good you are, you will
face the exact same end result as the worst child molestor that ever
lived. So what's the point of being good?"
Simple... If this world is as good as it gets, there's no better place
that we're going to, then we owe it to ourselves and our children to
make our planet as "good" and livable a place as possible. The true
test of morality is what we do when nobody's watching. A truly moral
person doesn't need an invisible father figure waiting to punish them
when they die.
The best description of athiesm I've read is this:
"I believe we're all atheists, I just believe in one less God than you
do. When you come to understand why you don't believe in any other God
then you'll understand why I don't believe in yours."
- Jordan
| |
| Freeway Frolickers for Jesus 2005-10-19, 11:30 pm |
| Into alt.atheism shot ugottarubmetherightway@hotmail.com and
breathlessly exclaimed:
quote:
>
>Atheists are people who don't believe in God. They say there's no
>afterlive, and you cease to exist when you die. With that in mind, I
>wonder at the rage atheists express over Alejandro Avila and his murder
>of Samantha Runnion, or their rage at any other killer. What if someone
>wanted to rape and murder a seven year old girl? Sure, you might be
>able to say it's morally wrong. But what does that matter? We are all
>going to face the horror of oblivion one day. One day when our bodies
>die, that will be it... we will cease to exist. Hitler, Stalin, Pol
>Pot, Mao, Genghis Khan, Madeline Albrecht, Janet Reno, and Hillary
>Clinton all faced or will face the exact same fate that happened to
>Jesus christ, Mother Theresa and Ghandi. Atheists tell us that no
>matter how morally good you are, you will face the exact same end
>result as the worst child molestor that ever lived. So what's the point
>of being good? You won't be rewarded for it in the afterlife. And you
>won't be punished in the afterlife for your evil deeds. Why can't
>someone go out and rape little girls and bash their skulls in
>afterward? Why shouldn't they do that? Ultimately, the exact same thing
>would happen to them if they didn't. Living a good life as a law
>abiding citizen that cares about others will earn you the same result
>as someone who enjoys inflicting pain on others.
Becasue if, by the time you reach adulthood, you need some higher
power to tell you the difference between right and wrong you are, by
definition, a psychopath.
------------------------------------------------
Conflict over the exact will/purpose/nature of God cannot ever be
resolved, since there are no facts to go on.
D Silverman FLAHN, SMLAHN
AA #2208
| |
|
|
<ugottarubmetherightway@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1129756078.709791.265970@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
quote:
> I've been reading some posts about Samantha Runnion over at
> alt.atheism, which makes for some very entertaining reading:
>
> http://groups.google.com/group/alt....d992dc8a2323446
>
> Atheists are people who don't believe in God. They say there's no
> afterlive, and you cease to exist when you die. With that in mind, I
> wonder at the rage atheists express over Alejandro Avila and his murder
> of Samantha Runnion, or their rage at any other killer. What if someone
> wanted to rape and murder a seven year old girl? Sure, you might be
> able to say it's morally wrong. But what does that matter? We are all
> going to face the horror of oblivion one day. One day when our bodies
> die, that will be it... we will cease to exist. Hitler, Stalin, Pol
> Pot, Mao, Genghis Khan, Madeline Albrecht, Janet Reno, and Hillary
> Clinton all faced or will face the exact same fate that happened to
> Jesus christ, Mother Theresa and Ghandi. Atheists tell us that no
> matter how morally good you are, you will face the exact same end
> result as the worst child molestor that ever lived. So what's the point
> of being good? You won't be rewarded for it in the afterlife. And you
> won't be punished in the afterlife for your evil deeds. Why can't
> someone go out and rape little girls and bash their skulls in
> afterward? Why shouldn't they do that? Ultimately, the exact same thing
> would happen to them if they didn't. Living a good life as a law
> abiding citizen that cares about others will earn you the same result
> as someone who enjoys inflicting pain on others.
>
> I think the main lesson atheism teaches is that good and evil doesn't
> matter, evil will never be punished, and the righteous will never be
> rewarded. There's no reason to do good and help your fellow human
> beings, and there's no reason why child molestors and murderers
> shouldn't do what they do.
There's the courts and prisons for those that do evil things, you dumbass.
| |
| Mark K. Bilbo 2005-10-19, 11:30 pm |
| In <1129756013.591015.159710@g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>,
ugottarubmetherightway@hotmail.com wrote:
quote:
> I think the main lesson atheism teaches...
Atheism "teaches" nothing at all. Atheism is a state of being without
belief in any gods. You might as well say the color blue "teaches"
something...
--
Mark K. Bilbo
--------------------------------------------------
"We're angry, Mr. President, and we'll be angry long
after our beloved city and surrounding parishes have
been pumped dry. Our people deserved rescuing.
Many who could have been were not. That's to the
government's shame."
http://makeashorterlink.com/?F2D511CBB
| |
| Doug Jacobs 2005-10-19, 11:30 pm |
| In alt.games.video.xbox FDR <_remove_spam_block_rzitka@hotmail.com> wrote:
quote:
> There's the courts and prisons for those that do evil things, you dumbass.
Riiiight.
And we all know how efficient the courts and prisons are. I mean, do you
honestly believe every pot smoker in prison is more evil than the
executives who ran Enron into the ground while making billions of dollars
in the process? And what about the despots around the world who have
ordered their people commit murder and even genocide on their whim? Yeah,
their courts did a good job cleaning up those regimes...
As Katrina has shown, freed from the threat of punishment posed by laws
and law enforcement, many just resorted to anarchy. It's disappointing,
but it's pretty evident that the only reason so many people claim to be
"law abiding citizens" is because of the threat of punishment (fines,
prison, etc.) and NOT because of any sort of internal strength to do the
right thing regardless of the external situation.
Finding and building that inner strength is one of the common goals of all
major religions.
Note that the threat/reward of the afterlife is just another form of law
enforcement. Unfortunatly, that's about the extent of what many churches
teach you. Someone who only behaves or does good to try to earn their way
into heaven (or whatever reward their religion believes in) will be in for
a rude shock.
In many ways, it's similar to a child becoming a responsible adult. The
child won't understand doing something just because it's the right thing
to do. However, the child WILL understand that if he doesn't clean up his
room, he'll be punished. Later, the child will keep his room clean not
because of any punishment or reward, but because he understands it's
something he's supposed to do. That's a sign he's becoming an adult.
| |
| 25character Luke Michaels 2005-10-19, 11:30 pm |
| You have completely missed the entire point of morality.
Your morality isn't based on causality.
Your morality is based on CONSCIENCE.
You don't rape and kill people because you hurt them in doing so, and
that is wrong. Not because you'll get punished in the afterlife.
| |
| ANIM8Rfsk 2005-10-19, 11:30 pm |
| in article 4356C87A.1010208@nowhere.net, Jamal Bernhard at noone@nowhere.net
wrote on 10/19/05 3:28 PM:
quote:
> ugottarubmetherightway@hotmail.com wrote:
>
>
> If the only reason you do good is to be rewarded for it, then you are a
> truly sad person, regardless of whether or not there's an afterlife.
>
> By the way, it's possible to be an Atheist (in the sense of not
> believing in a Judeo-Christian God) and still believe in an afterlife.
>
Except the definition of Atheist doesn't say anything about the God or Gods
being Judeo-Christian.
--
You Can't Stop the Signal
| |
| BTR1701 2005-10-19, 11:30 pm |
| In article <1129756078.709791.265970@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>,
ugottarubmetherightway@hotmail.com wrote:
quote:
> I've been reading some posts about Samantha Runnion over at
> alt.atheism, which makes for some very entertaining reading:
>
> http://groups.google.com/group/alt....d/b45ae747c6681
> 787/2d992dc8a2323446#2d992dc8a2323446
>
> Atheists are people who don't believe in God. They say there's no
> afterlive, and you cease to exist when you die. With that in mind, I
> wonder at the rage atheists express over Alejandro Avila and his murder
> of Samantha Runnion, or their rage at any other killer. What if someone
> wanted to rape and murder a seven year old girl? Sure, you might be
> able to say it's morally wrong. But what does that matter? We are all
> going to face the horror of oblivion one day. One day when our bodies
> die, that will be it... we will cease to exist. Hitler, Stalin, Pol
> Pot, Mao, Genghis Khan, Madeline Albrecht, Janet Reno, and Hillary
> Clinton all faced or will face the exact same fate that happened to
> Jesus christ, Mother Theresa and Ghandi. Atheists tell us that no
> matter how morally good you are, you will face the exact same end
> result as the worst child molestor that ever lived. So what's the point
> of being good? You won't be rewarded for it in the afterlife. And you
> won't be punished in the afterlife for your evil deeds. Why can't
> someone go out and rape little girls and bash their skulls in
> afterward? Why shouldn't they do that? Ultimately, the exact same thing
> would happen to them if they didn't. Living a good life as a law
> abiding citizen that cares about others will earn you the same result
> as someone who enjoys inflicting pain on others.
>
> I think the main lesson atheism teaches is that good and evil doesn't
> matter, evil will never be punished, and the righteous will never be
> rewarded. There's no reason to do good and help your fellow human
> beings, and there's no reason why child molestors and murderers
> shouldn't do what they do.
>
Whether some people deserve a reward and some people deserve to be
punished is irrelevant to the question of whether there is a god or not.
A supernatural deity doesn't suddenly spring into existence merely
because you think it's not fair that Mother Teresa wasn't rewarded and
Hitler wasn't punished when they died.
| |
| Fred Liken 2005-10-19, 11:30 pm |
| "Doug Jacobs" <djacobs@shell.rawbw.com> wrote in message
quote:
> In many ways, it's similar to a child becoming a responsible adult. The
> child won't understand doing something just because it's the right thing
> to do. However, the child WILL understand that if he doesn't clean up his
> room, he'll be punished. Later, the child will keep his room clean not
> because of any punishment or reward, but because he understands it's
> something he's supposed to do. That's a sign he's becoming an adult.
Why don't dogs shit in their own homes?
| |
| imagenieinabottlebaby 2005-10-19, 11:30 pm |
| Jamal Bernhard wrote:
quote:
> ugottarubmetherightway@hotmail.com wrote:
>
>
> If the only reason you do good is to be rewarded for it, then you are a
> truly sad person, regardless of whether or not there's an afterlife.
Why would I bother doing good, though? I mean, it will earn me the same
end result, anyway. Of course you're going to say "because it's just
the right thing to do." But there's something deeper than just the
incentives. People who do good without expecting rewards, do it because
they believe in the concept of goodness, and they put faith in the
concept of goodness. Atheism tells us that no matter how good we are
we're going to be destroyed forever, and that kind of thing has a way
of jading you. If atheism is true, then why would I care about
anything, or love anything or put faith in anything? Atheism is such a
spirit-crushing concept. Nothing matters. As the Poison song goes,
"give me something to belive in." Because if I'm going to face the
horror of ceasing to exist, I can't be motivated to care, love,
believe, or have faith.
quote:
>
> By the way, it's possible to be an Atheist (in the sense of not
> believing in a Judeo-Christian God) and still believe in an afterlife.
atheism is the belief that there is no god, and that when we die we
cease to excist.
| |
| imagenieinabottlebaby 2005-10-19, 11:30 pm |
|
Mark K. Bilbo wrote:
quote:
> In <1129756013.591015.159710@g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>,
> ugottarubmetherightway@hotmail.com wrote:
>
>
> Atheism "teaches" nothing at all. Atheism is a state of being without
> belief in any gods. You might as well say the color blue "teaches"
> something...
The example of atheism teaches something. We can learn from observing
atheism.
quote:
>
> --
> Mark K. Bilbo
> --------------------------------------------------
> "We're angry, Mr. President, and we'll be angry long
> after our beloved city and surrounding parishes have
> been pumped dry. Our people deserved rescuing.
> Many who could have been were not. That's to the
> government's shame."
>
> http://makeashorterlink.com/?F2D511CBB
| |
| ugottarubmetherightway@hotmail.com 2005-10-19, 11:30 pm |
|
Jordan wrote:
quote:
> "Atheists tell us that no matter how morally good you are, you will
> face the exact same end result as the worst child molestor that ever
> lived. So what's the point of being good?"
>
> Simple... If this world is as good as it gets, there's no better place
> that we're going to, then we owe it to ourselves and our children to
> make our planet as "good" and livable a place as possible. The true
> test of morality is what we do when nobody's watching. A truly moral
> person doesn't need an invisible father figure waiting to punish them
> when they die.
>
> The best description of athiesm I've read is this:
>
> "I believe we're all atheists, I just believe in one less God than you
> do. When you come to understand why you don't believe in any other God
> then you'll understand why I don't believe in yours."
>
> - Jordan
That's exactly my point. If we're going to cease to exist in oblivion,
then caring, good, faith, love, believing in tommorrow, and "we owe it
to our children" doesn't matter. Atheism says we're not going to be
conscious again, we're never going to think or feel again. What happens
to the world won't matter if we'll never feel emotions about it, or
even exist to see it.
| |
| ugottarubmetherightway@hotmail.com 2005-10-19, 11:30 pm |
|
Jordan wrote:
quote:
> "Atheists tell us that no matter how morally good you are, you will
> face the exact same end result as the worst child molestor that ever
> lived. So what's the point of being good?"
>
> Simple... If this world is as good as it gets, there's no better place
> that we're going to, then we owe it to ourselves and our children to
> make our planet as "good" and livable a place as possible. The true
> test of morality is what we do when nobody's watching. A truly moral
> person doesn't need an invisible father figure waiting to punish them
> when they die.
>
> The best description of athiesm I've read is this:
>
> "I believe we're all atheists, I just believe in one less God than you
> do. When you come to understand why you don't believe in any other God
> then you'll understand why I don't believe in yours."
>
> - Jordan
That's exactly my point. If we're going to cease to exist in oblivion,
then caring, good, faith, love, believing in tommorrow, and "we owe it
to our children" doesn't matter. Atheism says we're not going to be
conscious again, we're never going to think or feel again. What happens
to the world won't matter if we'll never feel emotions about it, or
even exist to see it.
| |
| KillzoneBigNunts 2005-10-19, 11:30 pm |
| Jordan wrote:
quote:
> "Atheists tell us that no matter how morally good you are, you will
> face the exact same end result as the worst child molestor that ever
> lived. So what's the point of being good?"
>
> Simple... If this world is as good as it gets, there's no better place
> that we're going to, then we owe it to ourselves and our children to
> make our planet as "good" and livable a place as possible. The true
> test of morality is what we do when nobody's watching. A truly moral
> person doesn't need an invisible father figure waiting to punish them
> when they die.
>
> The best description of athiesm I've read is this:
>
> "I believe we're all atheists, I just believe in one less God than you
> do. When you come to understand why you don't believe in any other God
> then you'll understand why I don't believe in yours."
>
> - Jordan
Meanwhile, I'm still waiting on the flux capacitor so I can send
Robocop back to the future.
--
| |
| SCraig 2005-10-19, 11:30 pm |
|
You don't have to believe in an afterlife to think that you don't have a
right to kill someone. That's a false argument. People can agree that
murder is wrong on other basis than the belief in an afterlife. And, as you
know, the Christian religion says that if a person asks forgiveness for
their sins before they die, they will be forgiven and get to go to heaven
anyway. How do you know that Hitler didn't do exactly that?
Actually, this business of being forgiven for sins AND that the
Christian/Jewish god requires that the person believe in him/her/it, as a
basis for that trip to heaven, is what really puts me off religion. I'd be
much more likely to buy into a religion that actually requires a person to
live a good life to get their ticket to heaven.
Craig
| |
| will(from the reality based community) 2005-10-19, 11:30 pm |
| On 19 Oct 2005 19:37:09 -0700, ugottarubmetherightway@hotmail.com
wrote:
quote:
>
>Jordan wrote:
>
>That's exactly my point. If we're going to cease to exist in oblivion,
>then caring, good, faith, love, believing in tommorrow, and "we owe it
>to our children" doesn't matter. Atheism says we're not going to be
>conscious again, we're never going to think or feel again. What happens
>to the world won't matter if we'll never feel emotions about it, or
>even exist to see it.
Bull. The only difference is that you act out of love rather than
fear. If I'm good only out of fear, then I haven't proven much. If I
am motivated by love of life and humanity, then I moved beyond fear to
a more positive motivation.
| |
| imagenieinabottlebaby 2005-10-19, 11:30 pm |
| Atheism has a way of crushing one's spirit and encouraging jadeness and
nihlism. What does having the right to do something or the lack thereof
matter? What does murder being wrong matter? You say murder is wrong,
but why does right or wrong matter? It's all meaningless. If atheism is
reality, then why should I have faith in the concepts of right or
wrong, or be inspired to avoid doing wrong acts.
SCraig wrote:
quote:
> You don't have to believe in an afterlife to think that you don't have a
> right to kill someone. That's a false argument. People can agree that
> murder is wrong on other basis than the belief in an afterlife. And, as you
> know, the Christian religion says that if a person asks forgiveness for
> their sins before they die, they will be forgiven and get to go to heaven
> anyway. How do you know that Hitler didn't do exactly that?
>
> Actually, this business of being forgiven for sins AND that the
> Christian/Jewish god requires that the person believe in him/her/it, as a
> basis for that trip to heaven, is what really puts me off religion. I'd be
> much more likely to buy into a religion that actually requires a person to
> live a good life to get their ticket to heaven.
>
> Craig
| |
| raven1 2005-10-19, 11:30 pm |
| On 19 Oct 2005 14:06:53 -0700, ugottarubmetherightway@hotmail.com
wrote:
quote:
>Atheists tell us that no
>matter how morally good you are, you will face the exact same end
>result as the worst child molestor that ever lived. So what's the point
>of being good? You won't be rewarded for it in the afterlife. And you
>won't be punished in the afterlife for your evil deeds. Why can't
>someone go out and rape little girls and bash their skulls in
>afterward? Why shouldn't they do that?
You are, of course, implying that only your fear of "God"'s punishment
keeps *you* from doing such things, which indicates that you're
essentially a psychopath.
---
"This is how liberty dies: with thunderous applause"
- Padme Amidala, Episode III
| |
| will(from the reality based community) 2005-10-19, 11:30 pm |
| On 19 Oct 2005 20:00:47 -0700, "imagenieinabottlebaby"
<ugottarubmetherightway@hotmail.com> wrote:
quote:
>
>will(from the reality based community) wrote:
>
>But atheism crushes spirit and when our spirits have been crushed, how
>can we be motivated? Why would I act out of love in a universe where
>love doesn't matter? The horrors of impending non existance have sucked
>all the faith out of me, now I can't have any faith in the concept of
>right or wrong, or love. Everything is meaningless, so why have
>positive motivation?
You have free will to choose to give meaning to your actions and your
life or to deny yourself any meaning.
Atheism doesn't crush positive motivation any more than some Christian
balderdash about Jesus coming back once things get screwed up enough
so there's no point in making the best of it here and now.
| |
| Uncle Vic 2005-10-19, 11:30 pm |
| Once upon a time in alt.atheism, dear sweet
(ugottarubmetherightway@hotmail.com) made the light shine upon us with
this:
quote:
> I think the main lesson atheism teaches is that good and evil doesn't
> matter, evil will never be punished, and the righteous will never be
> rewarded. There's no reason to do good and help your fellow human
> beings, and there's no reason why child molestors and murderers
> shouldn't do what they do.
Wrong, idiot.
Atheism doesn't teach anything, it's merely a lack of belief in the
supernatural (gods, ghosts, magic, etc.). As much as you'd like to
pretend, evil goes punished and "righteousness" is rewarded every day in
this life - your only life. Child molesters and murderers shouldn't do
what they do because it is anti-social behavior. You don't need a
biblegod in the sky and a book-o-blood to teach you this, it should be
plain common sense. The fact is, there are people who do still need the
fear of eternal retribution to keep them in line. You usually find them
in the neighborhood churches on Sunday morning, while the more
intelligent types are out enjoying life in a responsible manner. Why do
you think atheists are outnumbered 99.9 to 1 in the prisons of America?
--
Uncle Vic
aa#2011
Supervisor, EAC Department of little adhesive-backed "L" shaped
chrome-plastic doo-dads to add feet to Jesus fish department
Today's warm fuzzy example of Christian Love:
"1:19 And the LORD was with Judah; and he (JUDAH)drave out the
inhabitants of the mountain; but could not drive out the inhabitants
of the valley, because they had chariots of iron. IT WAS JUDAH YOU
DUMBXXXX.
Go back to masturbating to porn sites, you goddammned idiot."
-- Mikal 606
| |
| Uncle Vic 2005-10-19, 11:30 pm |
| Once upon a time in alt.atheism, dear sweet imagenieinabottlebaby
(ugottarubmetherightway@hotmail.com) made the light shine upon us with
this:
quote:
> Why would I bother doing good, though? I mean, it will earn me the same
> end result, anyway.
The end of life is not the point of living. Why do you focus your life on
death? Life is for living, and there is a distinct satisfaction derived
out of doing good, something which, I am sorry to say, someone who believes
that someone else can die to atone for your wrongdoings will never feel.
--
Uncle Vic
aa#2011
Supervisor, EAC Department of little adhesive-backed "L" shaped
chrome-plastic doo-dads to add feet to Jesus fish department
Today's warm fuzzy example of Christian Love:
"1:19 And the LORD was with Judah; and he (JUDAH)drave out the
inhabitants of the mountain; but could not drive out the inhabitants
of the valley, because they had chariots of iron. IT WAS JUDAH YOU
DUMBXXXX.
Go back to masturbating to porn sites, you goddammned idiot."
-- Mikal 606
| |
| Andy Richardson 2005-10-20, 2:35 am |
| ugottarubmetherightway@hotmail.com wrote:
quote:
> Jordan wrote:
>
>
>
> That's exactly my point. If we're going to cease to exist in oblivion,
> then caring, good, faith, love, believing in tommorrow, and "we owe it
> to our children" doesn't matter. Atheism says we're not going to be
> conscious again, we're never going to think or feel again. What happens
> to the world won't matter if we'll never feel emotions about it, or
> even exist to see it.
>
You seem to have a very depressing view of the world.
Andy
| |
| Uncle Vic 2005-10-20, 2:35 am |
| Once upon a time in alt.atheism, dear sweet imagenieinabottlebaby
(ugottarubmetherightway@hotmail.com) made the light shine upon us with
this:
quote:
>
> will(from the reality based community) wrote:
>
> But atheism crushes spirit
And you know this how? Because you can't imagine being without your
jesuswarmy babyblanky?
quote:
> and when our spirits have been crushed, how
> can we be motivated?
Reality is a good motivator. Love for one's family and friends, a desire
to make your community a better place to live in, and for your children
to live in, who needs spirit, whatever that is?
quote:
> Why would I act out of love in a universe where
> love doesn't matter?
Because you desire to do so? If more people did, instead of depending on
their jesusblankies and fearing supernatural retribution, the more love
would matter in this part of the universe where we live.
quote:
> The horrors of impending non existance have
> sucked all the faith out of me, now I can't have any faith in the
> concept of right or wrong, or love. Everything is meaningless, so why
> have positive motivation?
>
>
You don't need faith. Reality is far better. Trust me on this. Now,
try to imagine how you felt *before* you were born, before you existed.
When you're dead, you won't know it. You won't be able to, just like you
weren't able to before birth. Now that's not so bad, is it?
Stop worrying about the end of your life, and focus on living it.
--
Uncle Vic
aa#2011
Supervisor, EAC Department of little adhesive-backed "L" shaped
chrome-plastic doo-dads to add feet to Jesus fish department
Today's warm fuzzy example of Christian Love:
"1:19 And the LORD was with Judah; and he (JUDAH)drave out the
inhabitants of the mountain; but could not drive out the inhabitants
of the valley, because they had chariots of iron. IT WAS JUDAH YOU
DUMBXXXX.
Go back to masturbating to porn sites, you goddammned idiot."
-- Mikal 606
| |
| Jordan 2005-10-20, 2:35 am |
| That's an egotistical view. My point is that it doesn't matter if we're
around to see it or not. Our bloodline will. You might not care if your
bloodline survives, fine, don't have kids. But a communal society is
the best way to ensure that our genetics thrive, chaos is the worst
way.
- Jordan
| |
|
|
"will(from the reality based community)" <willmills@canoemail.com> wrote in
message news:aa2el1lba9tjgal9k71d0tif5u98kbb098@4ax.com...[vbcol=seagreen]
> On 19 Oct 2005 20:00:47 -0700, "imagenieinabottlebaby"
> <ugottarubmetherightway@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
Atheism doesn't crush spirit. Animals don't have any concept of god, yet
they are just as motivated to live and reproduce.
[vbcol=seagreen]
Love does matter. A mother will love her babies and children because it's
not only instinctual, it's also right. Love is healthy, hate isn't.
| |
| Jordan 2005-10-20, 2:35 am |
| I'd argue that under athiesm love has more meaning. Love is right here,
right now. It's not some cosmic payoff when you die. Right and wrong
exist right now, independent of what happens when you die.
It's pretty clear by now that you have no idea what you're talking
about, you might want to stop now.
- Jordan
| |
| Grinder 2005-10-20, 2:35 am |
| imagenieinabottlebaby wrote:
quote:
> will(from the reality based community) wrote:
>
>
>
> But atheism crushes spirit and when our spirits have been crushed, how
> can we be motivated? Why would I act out of love in a universe where
> love doesn't matter?
Love does matter, just not because we'll burn in Hell if we don't
practice it. Love, or more specifically, empathy, drives use to do as
little harm to each other as possible. That's a valid *objective* ethic
that needs not rely upon any *subjective* gods, and gives us a payout in
this world.
quote:
> The horrors of impending non existance have sucked
> all the faith out of me, now I can't have any faith in the concept of
> right or wrong, or love. Everything is meaningless, so why have
> positive motivation?
It is a sad state of affairs if you feel that compassion and justice are
only worthwhile if you receive some eternal payoff at the end of this
worldly sphere. Since, presumably, you have been decent to your friends
and family up to this point, perhaps you will be able to see the change
in quality of existence when you start disregarding them.
| |
| Mattinglyfan 2005-10-20, 5:31 am |
|
"Fred Liken" <nothanks@toocoolforschool.com> wrote in message
news:4356f93d$0$160$bb4e3ad8@newscene.com...
quote:
> "Doug Jacobs" <djacobs@shell.rawbw.com> wrote in message
>
>
> Why don't dogs shit in their own homes?
>
They do until you put a foot in their XXX a couple of times.
| |
| Freeway Frolickers for Jesus 2005-10-20, 5:31 am |
| Into alt.atheism shot "imagenieinabottlebaby"
<ugottarubmetherightway@hotmail.com> and breathlessly exclaimed:
quote:
>Atheism has a way of crushing one's spirit and encouraging jadeness and
>nihlism. What does having the right to do something or the lack thereof
>matter? What does murder being wrong matter? You say murder is wrong,
>but why does right or wrong matter? It's all meaningless. If atheism is
>reality, then why should I have faith in the concepts of right or
>wrong, or be inspired to avoid doing wrong acts.
We can't help you. You are a psychopath, the above statement
demonstrates this conclusively.
------------------------------------------------
Conflict over the exact will/purpose/nature of God cannot ever be
resolved, since there are no facts to go on.
D Silverman FLAHN, SMLAHN
AA #2208
| |
| Mark K. Bilbo 2005-10-20, 7:31 pm |
| In <1129774649.076043.217790@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com>,
"imagenieinabottlebaby" <ugottarubmetherightway@hotmail.com> wrote:
quote:
> Mark K. Bilbo wrote:
>
> The example of atheism teaches something. We can learn from observing
> atheism.
Did you catch it in a mason jar maybe?
Ever heard of the fallacy of reification?
Idiot.
--
Mark K. Bilbo
--------------------------------------------------
"We're angry, Mr. President, and we'll be angry long
after our beloved city and surrounding parishes have
been pumped dry. Our people deserved rescuing.
Many who could have been were not. That's to the
government's shame."
http://makeashorterlink.com/?F2D511CBB
| |
| kathryn 2005-10-20, 7:31 pm |
|
<ugottarubmetherightway@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1129756013.591015.159710@g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
quote:
> I've been reading some posts about Samantha Runnion over at
> alt.atheism, which makes for some very entertaining reading:
>
> http://groups.google.com/group/alt....d992dc8a2323446
>
> Atheists are people who don't believe in God. They say there's no
> afterlive, and you cease to exist when you die. With that in mind, I
> wonder at the rage atheists express over Alejandro Avila and his murder
> of Samantha Runnion, or their rage at any other killer.
Yeah isn't it weird that all atheists aren't raging murders/rapists/theives
etc.
Isn't it also weird that a number of those who are christians are.
It's a head scratcher for sure
| |
| Fred Liken 2005-10-20, 7:31 pm |
| "Jordan" <lundj@earthlink.net> wrote in message
quote:
> I'd argue that under athiesm love has more meaning. Love is right here,
> right now. It's not some cosmic payoff when you die. Right and wrong
> exist right now, independent of what happens when you die.
>
> It's pretty clear by now that you have no idea what you're talking
> about, you might want to stop now.
The hypocrisy....
| |
| Fred Liken 2005-10-20, 7:31 pm |
| "Mattinglyfan" <nyyankees@comcast.net> wrote in message
quote:
>
> They do until you put a foot in their XXX a couple of times.
That's YOUR home they are shitting in, not theirs. A dog doesn't shit in a
dog house. Your house is bigger than their "home" that they make in it.
And a puppy is a different matter. If a puppy shits in the den, the parent
eats it.
| |
| Mike V. 2005-10-20, 11:30 pm |
| On 19 Oct 2005 19:11:56 -0700, "imagenieinabottlebaby"
<ugottarubmetherightway@hotmail.com> posted :
quote:
>Jamal Bernhard wrote:
>
>Why would I bother doing good, though? I mean, it will earn me the same
>end result, anyway.
If you have to ask that, you must be a sick, sociopathic asswipe.
Which I gathered from your first post.
You're so XXXXing stupid, it's hard to know where to start.
A good place would be for you to recognize that there are people and
have been people in societies in this world that live without the
carrot on the stick you are talking about.
Think about that one for a while, dipshit.
| |
| wbarwell 2005-10-20, 11:30 pm |
| kathryn wrote:
quote:
>
> <ugottarubmetherightway@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:1129756013.591015.159710@g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
http://groups.google.com/group/alt....d992dc8a2323446[vbcol=seagreen]
>
> Yeah isn't it weird that all atheists aren't raging
> murders/rapists/theives etc.
>
> Isn't it also weird that a number of those who are christians
> are.
>
> It's a head scratcher for sure
All you have to do is look at xian history.
Witch hunts, heresy hunts crusades. inquisitions, pogroms,
torture, slavery, religous wars and forced conversions.
Bigotry anti-Semitism, hate and brutality. We had the religous
wars of the 1500's that raged for better part of 50 years
and killed one quarter of all Europe.
Nor is that old history. For teh last 30 years teh christian far
right and GOP has supprted every mass murdering, genocidal
bastrad it could embrace.
Saddam Hussein, Pol Pot, Rios Montt of Guatemala, Pinochet,
D'Aubisson of El Salvador and more.
Mass murder is good says the GOP president, leaders of House and
Senatem GOP rank and file, far right religous leaders, mainstream
christian denomintaions leaders and rank and file christian GOP
voters.
I don't know about you, but it has been making me sick to my
stomach for 30 long years.
--
The official spokesman of the Foxes said
today that investigation into what happened
to the henhouse may be needed.
Cheerful Charlie
| |
| Uncle Buck 2005-10-21, 2:30 am |
| On 20 Oct 2005 16:44:03 -0500, "Fred Liken" <nothanks@toocoolforschool.com>
wrote:
quote:
>"Jordan" <lundj@earthlink.net> wrote in message
>
>
>The hypocrisy....
What hypocrisy would that be? I don't see what you're translating into
hypocrisy. I'm sincerely interested in learning what you see as such. Care to
enlighten me? :-?
| |
| Jordan 2005-10-21, 7:31 pm |
| He thinks that someone who has been a professed athiest for 26 years
doesn't know what he's talking about. :^)
- Jordan
| |
| Cat_in_awe 2005-10-21, 7:31 pm |
| ugottarubmetherightway@hotmail.com wrote:
quote:
> That's exactly my point. If we're going to cease to exist in oblivion,
> then caring, good, faith, love, believing in tommorrow, and "we owe it
> to our children" doesn't matter.
You keep saying this: "if when we die then it's all over means nothing
matters". This is complete claptrap. There are thousands of reason to have
caring, good, faith, love and believing in tomorrow if you don't believe in
god or an afterlife. There are probably MORE reasons because this world and
life IS all we have, so we must do well and be 'good' to enjoy it.
quote:
> Atheism says we're not going to be
> conscious again, we're never going to think or feel again. What
> happens to the world won't matter if we'll never feel emotions about
> it, or even exist to see it.
More drivel.
--
GPC
| |
| Cat_in_awe 2005-10-21, 7:31 pm |
| imagenieinabottlebaby wrote:
quote:
> Atheism has a way of crushing one's spirit and encouraging jadeness
> and nihlism.
Your assertions about what atheism does and doesn't do are complete
claptrap, and have absolutely no basis You can leave now.
--
GPC
| |
| RainLover 2005-10-21, 7:31 pm |
| On 19 Oct 2005 19:11:56 -0700, "imagenieinabottlebaby"
<ugottarubmetherightway@hotmail.com> wrote:
quote:
>Jamal Bernhard wrote:
>
>Why would I bother doing good, though? I mean, it will earn me the same
>end result, anyway. Of course you're going to say "because it's just
>the right thing to do." But there's something deeper than just the
>incentives. People who do good without expecting rewards, do it because
>they believe in the concept of goodness, and they put faith in the
>concept of goodness.
RIGHT!!! Everything you just said is correct. Also... everything
you just said does NOT require belief in gods or an afterlife. If you
do good BECAUSE you expect rewards and/or a good afterlife then are
you simply doing it for SELFISH reasons.
An atheist who does good, does it because they want to do good, with
absolutely no concept of a reward or afterlife FOR IT.
Who's more likely to get into your Heaven?
1: The Christian who does it because they KNOW they'll get into
heaven for being good.
2: The atheist who does good because it's the right thing to do, no
reward needed or expected.
This question is one of many that made me seriously doubt my
Christianity and lead to a fullfilling life as an atheist.
quote:
>Atheism tells us that no matter how good we are
>we're going to be destroyed forever, and that kind of thing has a way
>of jading you.
And why would you think that? Why would I feel jaded because when my
life is over, it's over. Why couldn't that fact INSPIRE me to do good
and help others? (which it does, by the way)...
You're letting your Theistic worldview and brainwashing of what an
atheist "is" cloud your mind.
quote:
>If atheism is true, then why would I care about
>anything, or love anything or put faith in anything? Atheism is such a
>spirit-crushing concept. Nothing matters.
It's really pitiful that you see your life is WORTHLESS without that
carrot dangling out in front of you. Life is Beautiful, wonderful...
full of LOVE. Of course there are negative things in the world, and I
do my small part to fix what I can, but I look forward to each day as
it comes. I'm excited when I wake up. I'm JOYOUS when I create art.
I feel loved when my wife hugs me from behind, just because....
And one day it will be over. So what?
You know 'in the end' you will be fired, let go, or retired from your
job, does that make it not worth doing? One day your house will rot
and disintegrated back into the earth, does that make it not worth
building?
quote:
>As the Poison song goes,
>"give me something to belive in." Because if I'm going to face the
>horror of ceasing to exist, I can't be motivated to care, love,
>believe, or have faith.
I believe in People. I believe in love. I believe in helping those
around me. I believe in encouraging and teaching the less fortunate.
I believe in standing up for what is right as I see it.
There is no "horror" in not existing... when you die, you die...
there's no horror in that. After you die, parts of you live on in
those you've touched throughout your life. Die with that knowledge.
Die satisfied with your life lived. There's honor in that.
quote:
>
>atheism is the belief that there is no god, and that when we die we
>cease to excist.
I don't believe in an afterlife. I'm not sure how atheists can no
believe in gods (lack of evidence), yet believe in an afterlife (exact
same lack of evidence), but that's Their choice.
*IF* there's an afterlife, I'll be pleasantly surprised won't I? And,
contrary, if there isn't, those atheists and theists who believe in
one will never know there isn't. If that carrot of an afterlife
sustains them on their deathbeds, then I'm happy for them.
James, Seattle
| |
| Fred Liken 2005-10-21, 7:31 pm |
| "Uncle Buck" <UncleBuck@SpamMeNot.com> wrote in message
quote:
>
> What hypocrisy would that be? I don't see what you're translating into
> hypocrisy. I'm sincerely interested in learning what you see as such.
> Care to
> enlighten me? :-?
Jordan doesn't know what he's talking about. He's very ignorant of
Christianity/Buddhism/Judaism/Taoism/etc, so that's hypocrisy. 
| |
| Fred Liken 2005-10-21, 7:31 pm |
| "Jordan" <lundj@earthlink.net> wrote in message
quote:
> He thinks that someone who has been a professed athiest for 26 years
> doesn't know what he's talking about. :^)
lol. As if professing to be something gives you any special insight. What
a shmuck.
| |
| Fred Liken 2005-10-21, 7:31 pm |
| "Mike V." <michaelav@SPAMcox.net> wrote in message
quote:
>
> If you have to ask that, you must be a sick, sociopathic asswipe.
Why? Are you projecting your carrot and stick?
quote:
> Which I gathered from your first post.
> You're so XXXXing stupid, it's hard to know where to start.
Maybe that's a sign?
quote:
> A good place would be for you to recognize that there are people and
> have been people in societies in this world that live without the
> carrot on the stick you are talking about.
> Think about that one for a while, dipshit.
Yeah, they are followed by someone hitting them with the stick and eating
the carrot. lol.
Anyways, atheists are just riding the coat tails of the people with higher
purpose who built them their cradles to sleep in.
| |
| RainLover 2005-10-21, 7:31 pm |
| On 19 Oct 2005 19:34:40 -0700, ugottarubmetherightway@hotmail.com
wrote:
quote:
>
>Jordan wrote:
>
>That's exactly my point. If we're going to cease to exist in oblivion,
>then caring, good, faith, love, believing in tommorrow, and "we owe it
>to our children" doesn't matter.
What is wrong with simply wanting to be good.. do good, and leave
things better than we left them?
Why do you NEED a reward.... or, more to the point, a punishment, for
NOT doing these things? If your fear of hell or selfish need for
heaven wasn't hear to motivate you, are you saying you'd be a psycho
killer, doing whatever the hell you wanted, damn everyone else?
If you were CORRECT, do you realize the prisons would be full of
atheists.... funny thing IS, the ratio of atheists in prison is LOWER
than in the outside world. Imagine that, will ya?
quote:
>Atheism says we're not going to be
>conscious again, we're never going to think or feel again. What happens
>to the world won't matter if we'll never feel emotions about it, or
>even exist to see it.
You are really a selfish, self-centered, self-aggrandizing,
individual, aren't you? You HONESTLY think that if you didn't believe
in the gods in your life you would become a Monster. You know.. all
those nasty actions you are placing on atheists are probably coming
from your OWN self-conscious, dont' you???
Have you ever even MET an atheist???? Tell you what, I'm across the
Puget Sound from Seattle, Washington, USA, Earth... if you're ever in
town, let me know and we can do lunch. What you don't know about
'atheists' will astound you.
James, Seattle
| |
| Android66 2005-10-21, 7:31 pm |
| Which brings up an interesting point. Why is raping and killing wrong?
Because government forbids it? If there were no laws against murder,
would you kill someone? Would you feel bad about doing so?
The vast majority of people and societies throughout history have
viewed killing another human being as "wrong" behavior, despite
differences in culture, geography, ethnicity, wealth, poverty, and so
forth. This suggests that there are certain universal values (not a
popular notion in this age of moral relativism) that are inherrent to
human beings. We recognize injustice, we feel compassion, we know when
we have done something wrong, and we get angry when we see that this
world is "broken" and things aren't the way that they should be.
Where did these values come from? Where does a "conscience" come from?
It cannot be explained by evolution. After all, if survival of the
individual and his lineage is paramount, murder would be an acceptible
way to ensure the survival of the fittest, wouldn't it? If someone had
more food than you, you should murder them to make sure that you live
and your "competition" does not. If you wanted someone for a mate, but
they were already with someone else, you could murder their spouse. Or
you could murder the babies of another couple so that they don't
compete with your offspring for scarce resources. Sounds gruesome,
doesn't it? Yet this is the way that animals act, but not [most] human
beings. Why not? Why were we given a conscience and the ability to
discern right and wrong?
Apart from the complexity of this world, the nearly impossible odds
involved with its creation and evolution out of nothingness, and all
the major coincidences (for example, if our planet were slightly closer
to the sun or slightly further away, a distance which is neglible
compared to the size of the universe, it would not be capable of
suporting life), the fact that we seem to have a "conscience" is
further evidence (to me, anyway) that there is something else going on
much bigger than ourselves.
Whether you believe in a god or not, it bears investigation and serious
study before you reach a conclusion. It is the height of human
arrogance for a person to declare that he or she is 100% certain that
there is no creator/God/higher power...especially since there is so
much we still do not understand about life.
One last thought--if there is a God who gave mankind free will (and who
therefore values freedom of choice), wouldn't it make sense for Him to
provide just enough evidence of His existence so that people who want
to seek Him will find Him, and just enough uncertainty so that people
who aren't interested in seeking Him can be comfortable with that
decision? No one would feel coerced in either direction. If He
provided too much evidence, we would almost have no choice but to
believe; if He provided too little evidence, there would be no basis
for faith.
| |
| RainLover 2005-10-21, 7:31 pm |
| On 19 Oct 2005 20:00:47 -0700, "imagenieinabottlebaby"
<ugottarubmetherightway@hotmail.com> wrote:
quote:
>
>will(from the reality based community) wrote:
>
>But atheism crushes spirit and when our spirits have been crushed, how
>can we be motivated?
Atheism doesn't crush spirits... theists like to *THINK* atheists are
these poor, pitiful, depressed, unmotivated, anger-filled, god-haters,
but, hate to break it to you.... we aren't.
I've yet to encounter the christian version of an atheist in my 20
years of atheism and 41 years of life.
quote:
>Why would I act out of love in a universe where
>love doesn't matter?
Because love DOES matter? Just because your gods don't exist doesn't
mean love doesn't.
quote:
>The horrors of impending non existance have sucked
>all the faith out of me, now I can't have any faith in the concept of
>right or wrong, or love.
What would be horrifying about not existing? When you look at a dead
person, do they look horrified to you? Your feeling of terror isn't
because there's nothing after your death, your fear is 100% selfish
(yet understandable) that YOU will no longer be around to have things,
to feel things.... it is sad, no one looks forward to death, even
theists, but it's a FACT.
quote:
>Everything is meaningless, so why have
>positive motivation?
I give meaning to life everyday. Life is GREAT!!! Life has it's down
moments and hardships, but those 'bad' times are necessary in order to
*KNOW* what good feels like.
Personally, the idea of a PERFECT heaven... clouds, golden streets,
everyone always happy... what a nightmare. FAILURE is what gives life
meaning! Without the chance of failure, where is the challenge?
Where is the feeling of overcoming adversity? Where is triumph?
Where is the thrill of finding true love after many heartaches?
James, Seattle
| |
| Robibnikoff 2005-10-21, 7:31 pm |
|
"Fred Liken" <nothanks@toocoolforschool.com> wrote in message
news:43591100$1$222$bb4e3ad8@newscene.com...
quote:
> "Jordan" <lundj@earthlink.net> wrote in message
>
>
> lol. As if professing to be something gives you any special insight.
What
quote:
> a shmuck.
PLONK to yet another Usenet XXXXXXX.
--
Robyn
Resident Witchypoo
#1557
Science doesn't burn people at the stake for disagreeing - Vic Sagerquist
quote:
>
>
| |
| Fred Liken 2005-10-21, 7:31 pm |
| "Robibnikoff" <witchypoo@broomstick.com> wrote in message
quote:
> What
>
> PLONK to yet another Usenet XXXXXXX.
Why are you here, little miss?
| |
| Fred Liken 2005-10-21, 7:31 pm |
| "wbarwell" <wbarwell@mylinuxisp.com> wrote in message
quote:
> Witch hunts, heresy hunts crusades. inquisitions, pogroms,
> torture, slavery, religous wars and forced conversions.
> Bigotry anti-Semitism, hate and brutality. We had the religous
> wars of the 1500's that raged for better part of 50 years
> and killed one quarter of all Europe.
All of which had little at all to do with religion.
lol. Fitting that you are a Linux zealot.
quote:
> Nor is that old history. For teh last 30 years teh christian far
> right and GOP has supprted every mass murdering, genocidal
> bastrad it could embrace.
lol... icic IHBT.
quote:
> I don't know about you, but it has been making me sick to my
> stomach for 30 long years.
RAGE ON, BROTHER!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
| |
| Fred Liken 2005-10-21, 7:31 pm |
| "Mark K. Bilbo" <alt-atheism@org.webmaster> wrote
quote:
>
> Did you catch it in a mason jar maybe?
....what wit...
quote:
> Ever heard of the fallacy of reification?
>
> Idiot.
Um, did you ever hear of the fallacy of not making any sense since your
comment doesn't have any logical application? Idiot.
Humans learn quite a bit from observation and are taught lessons by examples
all the time. You need to switch sides, because you are making the mystics
look like the rational people by contrast.
| |
| Fred Liken 2005-10-21, 7:31 pm |
| "raven1" <quoththeraven@nevermore.com> wrote in message
quote:
> You are, of course, implying that only your fear of "God"'s punishment
> keeps *you* from doing such things, which indicates that you're
> essentially a psychopath.
Or..... a.... troll....
Dee dee dee!!!!!!!!!!!
| |
| Fred Liken 2005-10-21, 7:31 pm |
| "SCraig" <sassy@yahoo.com> wrote
quote:
> You don't have to believe in an afterlife to think that you don't have a
> right to kill someone. That's a false argument. People can agree that
> murder is wrong on other basis than the belief in an afterlife. And, as
> you
> know, the Christian religion says that if a person asks forgiveness for
> their sins before they die, they will be forgiven and get to go to heaven
> anyway. How do you know that Hitler didn't do exactly that?
You actually think Hitler was capable of actually asking for forgiveness?
You have to admit you are wrong to ask for forgiveness. Kind of a strange
notion that Hitler did that.
quote:
> Actually, this business of being forgiven for sins
What good is not being forgiven for sins if you realize you were wrong?
Guilt has little value and does little good.
quote:
> AND that the Christian/Jewish god
You forgot Muslims!
quote:
> requires that the person believe in him/her/it, as a
> basis for that trip to heaven, is what really puts me off religion.
Why? If you didn't believe in the god, then why would you believe in their
heaven? What do you have to lose?
quote:
> I'd be
> much more likely to buy into a religion that actually requires a person to
> live a good life to get their ticket to heaven.
Your misunderstanding of said religions taints your opinion. You are
required to lead a good life in both religions you claimed. The ten
commandments and other laws of the Jews requires that you lead a good life.
Jesus reaffirmed love your neighbor, etc.
You can't follow Jesus and live a deliberately evil life. It doesn't work.
Asking for forgiveness requires acceptance that what you did was wrong, so
simply saying "god, forgive me" doesn't mean much without acceptance. And,
if you did accept that what you did was wrong, then what's the harm if you
don't commit it again? Where does that break away from your beliefs in what
is right?
| |
| Fred Liken 2005-10-21, 7:31 pm |
| "imagenieinabottlebaby" <ugottarubmetherightway@hotmail.com> wrote
quote:
> Atheism has a way of crushing one's spirit and encouraging jadeness and
> nihlism.
lol. How's that differe from drive through religion?
quote:
> What does having the right to do something or the lack thereof
> matter? What does murder being wrong matter? You say murder is wrong,
> but why does right or wrong matter? It's all meaningless. If atheism is
> reality, then why should I have faith in the concepts of right or
> wrong, or be inspired to avoid doing wrong acts.
Because humans are social creatures with social rules, just like dogs, etc.
Those rules decide what is right and wrong and what is fair. Religions help
people do more than non religious people, but the core is covered by
instinct.
| |
| Uncle Buck 2005-10-21, 7:31 pm |
| On 21 Oct 2005 09:18:54 -0700, "Android66" <mandrovich@wifibullseye.com> wrote:
<snip>
quote:
>The vast majority of people and societies throughout history have
>viewed killing another human being as "wrong" behavior, despite
>differences in culture, geography, ethnicity, wealth, poverty, and so
>forth.
Correction: The vast majority of people and societies throughout history have
viewed killing another _APPROVED_ human being as "wrong" behavior. Few through
history have had little difficulty defining a class of people they view as not
deserving to live. There have been very few societies throughout history that
have viewed all killing of another human being as "wrong" behavior. By and
large, the only "wrong" killings in most societies throughout history have been
killings of friends, families and neighbors, and even then, only if they weren't
in league with the Devil. :-/
| |
| Doug Jacobs 2005-10-21, 7:31 pm |
| In alt.games.video.sony-playstation2 RainLover <SP-AMB-LOCKrainlover@raincity.com> wrote:
quote:
> An atheist who does good, does it because they want to do good, with
> absolutely no concept of a reward or afterlife FOR IT.
quote:
> Who's more likely to get into your Heaven?
quote:
> 1: The Christian who does it because they KNOW they'll get into
> heaven for being good.
quote:
> 2: The atheist who does good because it's the right thing to do, no
> reward needed or expected.
If you look at the Bible, the requirements for getting into Heaven are
pretty clear - the first is to accept God, the second is to give of
yourself selflessly.
So, I don't think neither would make it into heaven, since the atheist hasn't
accepted God, and the "Christian" who does believe in God, hasn't given
himself up to God.
quote:
> This question is one of many that made me seriously doubt my
> Christianity and lead to a fullfilling life as an atheist.
Yes, I know how you feel. Then again, I always felt the need to question
things, which I didn't think made me a good Christian as I didn't really
think this was showing faith.
Although, I always felt there was...something...out there.
I've recentally read a book which attempts to explain some of the true
messages in the Bible, and partially answered the questions I had - but
dared not ask - when I was younger. I think deep down I knew some of the
answers already, but since they didn't match what the churches were
saying, I began to doubt myself. While some doubt remains, I find myself
drifting back towards Christianity...only it's the Christianity described
in the Bible, and not by a church.
quote:
> *IF* there's an afterlife, I'll be pleasantly surprised won't I? And,
> contrary, if there isn't, those atheists and theists who believe in
> one will never know there isn't. If that carrot of an afterlife
> sustains them on their deathbeds, then I'm happy for them.
The problem is, if you treat the afterlife like the proverbial carrot (or
stick), then you haven't learned the lesson. Our actions shouldn't be
based on either a carrot or stick that someone is holding over our head.
We alone are responsible for the choices we make.
| |
| Doug Jacobs 2005-10-21, 7:31 pm |
| In alt.games.video.sony-playstation2 25character Luke Michaels <benserwa@gmail.com> wrote:
quote:
> You don't rape and kill people because you hurt them in doing so, and
> that is wrong. Not because you'll get punished in the afterlife.
Unfortunatly, for many people, the threat of a punishment (be it in this
life, or the afterlife) is the ONLY thing that keeps them from raping,
killing, stealing, etc.
| |
| RainLover 2005-10-21, 7:31 pm |
| On 21 Oct 2005 09:18:54 -0700, "Android66"
<mandrovich@wifibullseye.com> wrote:
SNIP
quote:
>Apart from the complexity of this world, the nearly impossible odds
>involved with its creation and evolution out of nothingness, and all
>the major coincidences (for example, if our planet were slightly closer
>to the sun or slightly further away, a distance which is neglible
>compared to the size of the universe, it would not be capable of
>suporting life), the fact that we seem to have a "conscience" is
>further evidence (to me, anyway) that there is something else going on
>much bigger than ourselves.
So... to restate:
I've big and complicated, so GOD DID IT.
That's the same arguement for volcano gods, sun gods, sea gods, wind
gods, love gods, war gods, etc.... NO DIFFERENCE AT ALL.
quote:
>Whether you believe in a god or not, it bears investigation and serious
>study before you reach a conclusion. It is the height of human
>arrogance for a person to declare that he or she is 100% certain that
>there is no creator/God/higher power...especially since there is so
>much we still do not understand about life.
Again... you're talking about the God-of-the-Gaps (in knowledge).
Basically, you're saying we should believe in a god(s) because the
world around us is complicated and confusing.
I've never met an atheist who is truly 100% CERTAIN there are no gods,
but with the level of evidence hanging right around ZERO, there's as
much reason to believe in any of the 1,000 gods as there is unicorns
and chocolate teapots orbiting Mars.
Gods are MADE UP... they are MYTHS. People use gods to explain the
unexplainable.... it's been that way for 50,000 years or more.
quote:
>
>One last thought--if there is a God who gave mankind free will (and who
>therefore values freedom of choice), wouldn't it make sense for Him to
>provide just enough evidence of His existence so that people who want
>to seek Him will find Him, and just enough uncertainty so that people
>who aren't interested in seeking Him can be comfortable with that
>decision?
If your god gave everyone free will, then at least SOMEONE in the last
2,000 years would have lead a good, sin free christian life. What
sort of "choice" is it when it's *IMPOSIBLE* to choose not to "sin"
according to your holy book???
If you're talking about free will of following your god over all the
OTHER gods or following your god over no gods... well, again, there's
not really free will involved.
I was a christian for 20 year... the dogma doesn't hold up to hard
questions, so I left, and now I'm an atheist at age 41. The god of
yours is supposed to be ALL POWERFUL, right? So why is there
absolutely no evidence for him????
I mean, the BEST evidence is "life is complicated" and "babies" and
"my, look at that sunrise and tell me god doesn't exist"
Other that THAT, there's an old book full of contradictions, errors,
and obvious tampering by past religion leaders and whatever comes out
of the mouths of christians.
To sum up:
No physical evidence
Faulty book
word of mouth
My question is why anyone IS a Christian based on these things. If
your all-powerful god can't provide a reason to believe in him other
than the above, then he's a piss-poor god, isn't he?
quote:
>No one would feel coerced in either direction. If He
>provided too much evidence, we would almost have no choice but to
>believe; if He provided too little evidence, there would be no basis
>for faith.
He Provides ABSOLUTELY NO EVIDENCE for his existance. None. Zilch.
Nada, Zed.
If you disagree, please put ONE piece of evidence for your god's
existance in the space provided below:
_____________________________________________________
____________________________________________________
____________________________________________________
Blank... just as I suspected. ;-)
James, Seattle
| |
| Jordan 2005-10-21, 7:31 pm |
| Funny how I was commenting on athiesm as an atheist. I wasn't
pretending to be a person of faith, any faith. Used a dictionary
lately?
http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=hypocrite
hypocrite
n : a person who professes beliefs and opinions that he does not hold
[syn: dissembler, phony, phoney, pretender]
If it's one thing I'm not, it's a hypocrite.
- Jordan
| |
| Fred Liken 2005-10-21, 7:31 pm |
| "RainLover" <SP-AMB-LOCKrainlover@raincity.com> wrote in message
quote:
> My question is why anyone IS a Christian based on these things.
Basically, you don't know why because you don't know what you don't know.
Worse kind of state to be in.
| |
| Fred Liken 2005-10-21, 7:31 pm |
| "Android66" <mandrovich@wifibullseye.com> wrote in message
quote:
> The vast majority of people and societies throughout history have
> viewed killing another human being as "wrong" behavior, despite
> differences in culture, geography, ethnicity, wealth, poverty, and so
> forth. This suggests that there are certain universal values (not a
> popular notion in this age of moral relativism) that are inherrent to
> human beings. We recognize injustice, we feel compassion, we know when
> we have done something wrong, and we get angry when we see that this
> world is "broken" and things aren't the way that they should be.
Dogs and Apes do the same thing.
quote:
> Where did these values come from? Where does a "conscience" come from?
> It cannot be explained by evolution. After all, if survival of the
> individual and his lineage is paramount, murder would be an acceptible
> way to ensure the survival of the fittest, wouldn't it?
Values and conscience taken appart, values can come from evolution. Pack
behavior allows individuals in the pack to succeed where they would fail
alone. Keeping the pack healthy, as in not allowing murder, etc, for the
sake of the pack is benifitial.
quote:
> If someone had
> more food than you, you should murder them to make sure that you live
> and your "competition" does not.
Cart before the horse. Having more than someone is only really that
recognizable in situations where you already have a pack. When two packs
meet and one has more, it can result in war and killing, but that's not
murder by definition.
quote:
> If you wanted someone for a mate, but
> they were already with someone else, you could murder their spouse. Or
> you could murder the babies of another couple so that they don't
> compete with your offspring for scarce resources. Sounds gruesome,
> doesn't it? Yet this is the way that animals act, but not [most] human
> beings.
Bullshit. Animals don't act like that, especially ones that live in packs.
quote:
> Why not? Why were we given a conscience and the ability to
> discern right and wrong?
Dogs.
quote:
> Apart from the complexity of this world, the nearly impossible odds
> involved with its creation and evolution out of nothingness, and all
> the major coincidences (for example, if our planet were slightly closer
> to the sun or slightly further away, a distance which is neglible
> compared to the size of the universe, it would not be capable of
> suporting life),
And, the odds are pretty good when the universe is as big as it is.
quote:
> the fact that we seem to have a "conscience" is
> further evidence (to me, anyway) that there is something else going on
> much bigger than ourselves.
It seems easily explained via evolution.
quote:
> Whether you believe in a god or not, it bears investigation and serious
> study before you reach a conclusion. It is the height of human
> arrogance for a person to declare that he or she is 100% certain that
> there is no creator/God/higher power...especially since there is so
> much we still do not understand about life.
But, that's what faith is all about.
quote:
> One last thought--if there is a God who gave mankind free will (and who
> therefore values freedom of choice), wouldn't it make sense for Him to
> provide just enough evidence of His existence so that people who want
> to seek Him will find Him, and just enough uncertainty so that people
> who aren't interested in seeking Him can be comfortable with that
> decision? No one would feel coerced in either direction. If He
> provided too much evidence, we would almost have no choice but to
> believe; if He provided too little evidence, there would be no basis
> for faith.
Any evidence would be too much.
| |
| Doug Jacobs 2005-10-21, 7:31 pm |
| In alt.games.video.sony-playstation2 wbarwell <wbarwell@mylinuxisp.com> wrote:
quote:
> All you have to do is look at xian history.
quote:
> Witch hunts, heresy hunts crusades. inquisitions, pogroms,
> torture, slavery, religous wars and forced conversions.
> Bigotry anti-Semitism, hate and brutality. We had the religous
> wars of the 1500's that raged for better part of 50 years
> and killed one quarter of all Europe.
Do try to remember that just because people claim to be doing something in
the name of "God" or "Christianity", doesn't make it so. Nor does that
mean that you could lump everyone who claimed to be a Christian together
in supporting the things you list. Remember, the terrorists from 9/11
claim to be Muslim, but that obviously doesn't mean that ALL Muslims agree
with the terrorists - or are even terrorists themselves.
Likewise, many of the people today who claim to be Christian when they
speak about Christianity aren't neccessarily Christians either. If you
actually look at what the Bible says about churches in general, you'll see
that the Bible speaks out against many things the so-called Christian
churches are doing today. Things like not worshipping icons or images, or
using the church to sell items, or the belief that you MUST speak to God
through this person you call "Father"...
I would say it's not Christianity itself that has caused the problems, but
the political organization called "the Christian Church" - of which many
of the members are not real Christians even though they're regular members
of the "church".
quote:
> Nor is that old history. For teh last 30 years teh christian far
> right and GOP has supprted every mass murdering, genocidal
> bastrad it could embrace.
> Saddam Hussein, Pol Pot, Rios Montt of Guatemala, Pinochet,
> D'Aubisson of El Salvador and more.
quote:
> Mass murder is good says the GOP president, leaders of House and
> Senatem GOP rank and file, far right religous leaders, mainstream
> christian denomintaions leaders and rank and file christian GOP
> voters.
quote:
> I don't know about you, but it has been making me sick to my
> stomach for 30 long years.
quote:
> --
> The official spokesman of the Foxes said
> today that investigation into what happened
> to the henhouse may be needed.
quote:
> Cheerful Charlie
| |
| Mike V. 2005-10-21, 7:31 pm |
| On 21 Oct 2005 11:08:03 -0500, "Fred Liken"
<nothanks@toocoolforschool.com> posted :
quote:
>"Mike V." <michaelav@SPAMcox.net> wrote in message
>
>
>Why? Are you projecting your carrot and stick?
>
>
>Maybe that's a sign?
>
>
>Yeah, they are followed by someone hitting them with the stick and eating
>the carrot. lol.
>
>Anyways, atheists are just riding the coat tails of the people with higher
>purpose who built them their cradles to sleep in.
>
I wouldn't know, because I'm not one, but your argument is still
stupid.
The only people that I see riding coat tails are idiot religious
freaks that take advantage of everything that science has to offer on
the one hand, while on the other hand say that they are all full of
shit.
People that don't "believe" in evolution, for instance.
They shouldn't be allowed to use any modern science or medicine.
| |
| Android66 2005-10-21, 11:30 pm |
| How so?
I believe in aspirin because my headache goes away and my fever goes
down after I take one, which is just what scientific studies say should
happen. I don't believe the THEORY of evolution, however, because it
does not adequately explain how life began and how it got to this
stage.
Most genetic mutations are harmful, not beneficial, for example. The
laws of thermodynamics and entropy suggest that the universe moves
towards disorder not a state of order. Then there is the idea of
irreducable complexity of certain systems. And if animals and humans
all evolved from common ancestors, where are the intermediate species?
For example, we have dogs and we have horses, humans and apes. Horses
are said to have evolved from dogs, and humans from apes. If each step
in the evolutionary process is "better" than the last step, why is it
that we have the original product (apes and dogs) and the final product
(humans and horses), but no intermediate creatures that would have been
superior to the originals and inferior to us?
There are many other reasons for believing that evolution does not
adequately explain our world. Just because I don't think the THEORY of
evolution is correct doesn't mean that I reject *all* scientific
theories and should be unable to benefit from modern science or
medicine.
| |
| navi-gater 2005-10-22, 2:30 am |
| "imagenieinabottlebaby" <ugottarubmetherightway@hotmail.com> wrote in
news:1129774372.924349.191690@g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com:
quote:
>
> Why would I bother doing good, though? I mean, it will earn me the
same
quote:
> end result, anyway. Of course you're going to say "because it's just
> the right thing to do." But there's something deeper than just the
> incentives. People who do good without expecting rewards, do it
because
It is really rather simple. Why does any animal avoid being killed?
Because it wishes to live and pro-create. Without the instinct to
survive a species dies out (as a result the failing evolutionary branch
comes to an end).
Our species (which has the instinct to survive) has discovered something
valuable - we can avoid killing by agreeing rules by which we can live
together - Humans are pack animals.
That leads to the illeglity of murder and other acts which inhibit
someone else's ability to live and pro-create. Mix that in with a bit of
status building and you arrive at the rules which almost every
civilization on earth has managed to get to (and you can include animals
other than Humans in that too).
The other rules from religion (e.g. the bible forbids pork, working on
Sunday and allows for wife beating) are just the ignorant bleating of
the stupid.
quote:
afterlife.[vbcol=seagreen]
>
> atheism is the belief that there is no god, and that when we die we
> cease to excist.
No.
Theism = Belief in Deity
Atheism = No belief in a Deity.
Atheism is not a belief - it is the absence of belief. That's it,
nothing else.
gater.
| |
| raven1 2005-10-22, 2:30 am |
| On 21 Oct 2005 12:47:05 -0500, "Fred Liken"
<nothanks@toocoolforschool.com> wrote:
quote:
>"raven1" <quoththeraven@nevermore.com> wrote in message
>
>
>Or..... a.... troll....
You misspelled "XXXXXXX".
---
"This is how liberty dies: with thunderous applause"
- Padme Amidala, Episode III
| |
| Dr Smithpeters 2005-10-22, 7:31 pm |
| Amd that's why you've probably more than once in your life been called a
sociopath. The concept of doing good for people just because people
deserve to have good done for them is as foreign to your thought-process
as the lack of a conscience would be to most atheists.
imagenieinabottlebaby wrote:
Because if I'm going to face the
quote:
> horror of ceasing to exist, I can't be motivated to care, love,
> believe, or have faith.
>
| |
| Mark K. Bilbo 2005-10-22, 7:31 pm |
| In <43592835$0$211$bb4e3ad8@newscene.com>, "Fred Liken"
<nothanks@toocoolforschool.com> wrote:
quote:
> "Mark K. Bilbo" <alt-atheism@org.webmaster> wrote
>
>
> ...what wit...
>
>
> Um, did you ever hear of the fallacy of not making any sense since your
> comment doesn't have any logical application? Idiot.
>
> Humans learn quite a bit from observation and are taught lessons by
> examples all the time. You need to switch sides, because you are making
> the mystics look like the rational people by contrast.
Atheism is not a behavior that can be observed. It is the state of being
without belief in gods. That's all.
--
Mark K. Bilbo
--------------------------------------------------
"We're angry, Mr. President, and we'll be angry long
after our beloved city and surrounding parishes have
been pumped dry. Our people deserved rescuing.
Many who could have been were not. That's to the
government's shame."
http://www.nola.com/
"FEMA email warned of disaster"
http://makeashorterlink.com/?C5332250C
| |
| Mark K. Bilbo 2005-10-22, 7:31 pm |
| In <1129777247.466153.213870@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com>,
"imagenieinabottlebaby" <ugottarubmetherightway@hotmail.com> wrote:
quote:
>
> will(from the reality based community) wrote:
>
> But atheism crushes spirit and when our spirits have been crushed, how can
> we be motivated? Why would I act out of love in a universe where love
> doesn't matter? The horrors of impending non existance have sucked all the
> faith out of me, now I can't have any faith in the concept of right or
> wrong, or love. Everything is meaningless, so why have positive
> motivation?
Why do you lie so much?
--
Mark K. Bilbo
--------------------------------------------------
"We're angry, Mr. President, and we'll be angry long
after our beloved city and surrounding parishes have
been pumped dry. Our people deserved rescuing.
Many who could have been were not. That's to the
government's shame."
http://www.nola.com/
"FEMA email warned of disaster"
http://makeashorterlink.com/?C5332250C
| |
| Mark K. Bilbo 2005-10-22, 7:31 pm |
| In <1129775680.835183.69110@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>,
ugottarubmetherightway@hotmail.com wrote:
quote:
>
> Jordan wrote:
>
> That's exactly my point. If we're going to cease to exist in oblivion,
> then caring, good, faith, love, believing in tommorrow, and "we owe it to
> our children" doesn't matter. Atheism says we're not going to be conscious
> again, we're never going to think or feel again. What happens to the world
> won't matter if we'll never feel emotions about it, or even exist to see
> it.
First of all, atheism "says" nothing at all (I swear, we're wading neck
deep in hypostatisation lately... must be Wilma).
Simply put, either we will or will not "be conscious again." Period.
"Belief" is irrelevant. To date, there is no compelling evidence that
anything of consciousness survives death.
If you derive something nihilistic from this, that's *your problem. Not
mine.
--
Mark K. Bilbo
--------------------------------------------------
"We're angry, Mr. President, and we'll be angry long
after our beloved city and surrounding parishes have
been pumped dry. Our people deserved rescuing.
Many who could have been were not. That's to the
government's shame."
http://www.nola.com/
"FEMA email warned of disaster"
http://makeashorterlink.com/?C5332250C
| |
| Jeff Jones 2005-10-23, 7:31 pm |
|
"imagenieinabottlebaby" <ugottarubmetherightway@hotmail.com> wrote in
message news:1129776777.002837.206950@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
quote:
> Atheism has a way of crushing one's spirit and encouraging jadeness and
> nihlism. What does having the right to do something or the lack thereof
> matter? What does murder being wrong matter? You say murder is wrong,
> but why does right or wrong matter? It's all meaningless. If atheism is
> reality, then why should I have faith in the concepts of right or
> wrong, or be inspired to avoid doing wrong acts.
And yet I, as an atheist, have no desire to murder anyone. I also have no
desier to steal my neighbor's car although I admire it very much. I live in
a society where we have set certain rules by which we can all get along
together in peace and relative harmony. This structure is very much in my
self interest since I don't want anyone murdering me or stealing my things
either. Hundreds of thousands of years of human social evolution have
brought us to this point and it seems to work pretty well.
So, I don't believe in either eternal reward nor endless torment and yet I
don't do these vile things. You have admitted in your post that were it not
for your "faith" you would, apparently, murder people since you can think of
no other reason not to. So tell me again how your "morality" is superior to
mine?
Jeff Jones
Austin, Texas
aa #2044
| |
| 655321 2005-10-23, 7:31 pm |
| On 2005-10-21 12:04:37 -0700, Doug Jacobs <djacobs@shell.rawbw.com> said:
quote:
> If you look at the Bible, the requirements for getting into Heaven are
> pretty clear - the first is to accept God, the second is to give of
> yourself selflessly.
The second is near impossible for the believer once he is certain that
the post-mortem reward exists. One cannot give of himself selflessly
if the goal is HeavenŽ.
--
GlennGlenn (655321) -- aa#825 -- DipthotDipthot@Yahoo.Yahoo.Com.Com
I am not famous, I am notorious. And if I am rich, it is because I have
taken my wages in people.
- Quentin Crisp
| |
| Paul Erickson 2005-10-23, 11:30 pm |
| On 21 Oct 2005 17:27:17 -0700, "Android66"
<mandrovich@wifibullseye.com> wrote:
quote:
>How so?
>
>I believe in aspirin because my headache goes away and my fever goes
>down after I take one, which is just what scientific studies say should
>happen. I don't believe the THEORY of evolution, however, because it
>does not adequately explain how life began and how it got to this
>stage.
The theory of evolution does not address the question of life's
origin.
quote:
>Most genetic mutations are harmful, not beneficial, for example.
As I understand it, most mutations make little difference.
quote:
>The
>laws of thermodynamics and entropy suggest that the universe moves
>towards disorder not a state of order. Then there is the idea of
>irreducable complexity of certain systems. And if animals and humans
>all evolved from common ancestors, where are the intermediate species?
>For example, we have dogs and we have horses, humans and apes. Horses
>are said to have evolved from dogs, and humans from apes. If each step
>in the | | |