| HockeyTownUSA 2007-01-30, 8:02 pm |
|
"Tomcat (Tom)" <tom_dallas31@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1167412723.486576.248460@h40g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
quote:
> Big Daddy wrote:
> And I don't think many 360 owners, myself included, have been trying to
> paint the PS3 as an unreliable console. It's not. In fact it doesn't
> have any major flaws at all really, other than lack of games.
>
> However, the fact that it seems to be fairly reliable is not a plus for
> it, it's an absolute requirement. The PS3 is so far behind with so
> many things going against it, if it starts showing signs of
> unreliability then that could be the final nail in the coffin.
>
How can it be considered "fairly reliable" when there's no games to really
tax its features? So the interface is flawless, but that's been tested to
death. The few games that are out are marginally better than a PS2 game at
best. Let's make an assessment after a large number of titles are out there
for the PS3 before making any claims. It's kinda like saying your new car
runs fine, but I haven't driven it more than 2000 miles.
|