Home > Archive > Nintendo gamecube > March 2005 > Re: Do digitized live action games still have a place in gaming?





You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread. To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to this thread please [click here]

Author Re: Do digitized live action games still have a place in gaming?
Highlandish

2005-03-30, 6:34 pm

Quoth The Raven "livingdjinn@yahoo.com"<livingdjinn@yahoo.com> in
1111866841.185348.62510@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com
quote:

> Remember the 90s, when we had Mortal Kombat and the various games like
> Night Trap on the Sega CD? Those were good times. I was happy to see
> that videogaming was moving in the direction of live action and photo
> realism, but unfortunately ever since the late 90's gaming has taken a
> step backwith the decision to render everything in cgi.
>
> In my opinion, if gaming is to ever truly advance the companies must
> stop this rendering, cgi, fake looking crap and go back to digitized
> actors. The videogame companies have lost their way, but they can
> still find the path back and get on the right track. With today's
> technology they can probably digitize live actors much better than
> they did in the 90s, and it would definitely look better than the
> xbox and ps2 games we have today where everything looks like plastic.
> Digitized actors are an integral step in the hologram videogames that
> we'll hopefully have decades from now, and they offer something
> rendering never could: we get to see a REAL LIFE liu kang beat up a
> REAL LIFE kung lao.


real life FATALITY? LOL, but sure I enjoyed kung fu on the amiga, I cant
remember having so much fun in years with 2 players on the one screen. I
guess its a console thing though.

--
Is reading in the bathroom considered multi-tasking?

Take out the _CURSEING to reply to me


Copyright 2003 - 2008 gamesreviews.net Software forum  PC Hardware reviews