|
Home > Archive > Nintendo gamecube > March 2005 > Re: Revolution controller: No Buttons, No Sticks, All Touch Screen
You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread.
To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to
this thread please [click here]
| Author |
Re: Revolution controller: No Buttons, No Sticks, All Touch Screen
|
|
|
| "Leon Dexter" <leondexterNOSPAM@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:_8K0e.3204$gI5.2853@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net...
quote:
> "Dunny" <paul.dunn4@ntlworld.com> wrote in message
> news:3ad2b0F6a0f0iU1@individual.net...
>
>
> Yes, for you. But YOU don't determine what games are classics, etc.
> Everyone does, and they've long since been billed as such.
So although everyone makes the decision as to whether or not a game is
classic, you aren't going to allow my vote to count. You are aware, I
assume, of how that sounds. I'm getting the idea that games are only
classics if you follow the herd.
I consider Spy Hunter a classic. But I also know that there are a great many
people who do not, and hate the game with a vengeance. That's immaterial - I
still consider it a classic.
Again, I don't accept OoT as a classic - I don't agree with the mainstream.
You aren't going to change that, and as such you cannot tell *me* that it is
a classic, as you're obviously misguided _in_my_eyes_.
quote:
> The GBA link isn't networked gaming. It's a gimmick to try and sell
> games.
> Rarely is it used to play games, its purpose was to get people to buy home
> console and portable versions of the same game, or games from the same
> company. 90% of the time it was used to "unlock" content. That's
> original,
> even if it is stupid. And greedy.
Can't say I've ever used the GBA link for *not* playing games, but I suppose
you might use it for purposes other than I.
D.
|
| |
|
|