|
Home > Archive > Chess forum > August 2006 > Sam Sloan's worked hard to create biographies and some stupid deleted it.
You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread.
To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to
this thread please [click here]
| Author |
Sam Sloan's worked hard to create biographies and some stupid deleted it.
|
|
|
|
Sam Sloan wrote:
quote:
> Louis Blair is trying to have all my Wikipedia chess biographies
> deleted.
>
> Chess politics gadfly Louis Blair has been going around Wikipedia for
> the last few days campaigning to have all my biographies of chess
> personalities deleted.
>
True there are some people who do good for all. While some stupids do
nothing but destroys others property and hard work.
Bad people just blame the hard working people as they have nothing in
themselves.
You have created the Biographies of good Chess People.
If you have the Backup you can Post them at
http://www.softtanks.com/Personality/add.php?uid=1
Here none of your Biographies will be deleted without getting your
passwords.
One should not destroy other art work, litrature work. It takes lot of
time and money increating such biographies. If you find mistake better
is to suggest the author about your problems instead deleteting books
and biographies of others.
Bye
Sanny
Play Chess at: http://www.GetClub.com/Chess.html
| |
| Taylor Kingston 2006-08-05, 7:37 pm |
|
Sanny wrote:
quote:
> Sam Sloan wrote:
>
> True there are some people who do good for all. While some stupids do
> nothing but destroys others property and hard work.
>
> Bad people just blame the hard working people as they have nothing in
> themselves.
>
> You have created the Biographies of good Chess People.
>
> If you have the Backup you can Post them at
> http://www.softtanks.com/Personality/add.php?uid=1
>
> Here none of your Biographies will be deleted without getting your
> passwords.
>
> One should not destroy other art work, litrature work. It takes lot of
> time and money increating such biographies. If you find mistake better
> is to suggest the author about your problems instead deleteting books
> and biographies of others.
Sanny, you understand nothing of the Sloan/Wikipedia situation. Sam
is doing no one any good. Follow the advice of the great Phil Innes:
"Beware these certainties when wiser men are silent."
In other words, it's better not to butt in when you don't know what's
going on.
| |
| Chess One 2006-08-05, 7:37 pm |
|
"Taylor Kingston" <tkingston@chittenden.com> wrote in message
news:1154793837.904023.99780@m79g2000cwm.googlegroups.com...
quote:
>
> Sanny wrote:
>
> Sanny, you understand nothing of the Sloan/Wikipedia situation. Sam
> is doing no one any good. Follow the advice of the great Phil Innes:
> "Beware these certainties when wiser men are silent."
Kingston doesn't recognise that the phrase means that if you cannot add
substantive material or some othe value of appreciation, to shut your damned
ignorant mouth.
That is also the issue with Wikipedia - if you can improve on the
biographies by all means do so [which does not mean having it your own
way] - but destroying them wholesale is wicked, and the actions of boys,
don't know and don't care fer nuthin'.
Why Kingston cannot accept such an adult view of things is not my business,
mine is simply to say that he is a sad destructive lout, overconcerned about
appearing good in public, no matter who suffers.
In this instance, chess history suffers.
Phil Innes
quote:
> In other words, it's better not to butt in when you don't know what's
> going on.
| |
| Taylor Kingston 2006-08-05, 7:37 pm |
|
Chess One wrote:
quote:
> In this instance, chess history suffers.
Indeed, Phil, chess history suffers when it is at the mercy of Sam
Sloan. If Dr Blair or others want to come to the rescue, more power to
them.
| |
| lblai@blackburn.edu 2006-08-05, 7:37 pm |
| Sanny (softtanks@hotmail.com)
(NNTP-Posting-Host: 59.144.131.12)
wrote (5 Aug 2006 06:51:41 -0700):
7 Sam Sloan wrote:
7 > Louis Blair is trying to have all my Wikipedia chess biographies
7 > deleted.
7 >
7 > Chess politics gadfly Louis Blair has been going around
7 > Wikipedia for the last few days campaigning to have all my
7 > biographies of chess personalities deleted.
7
7 True there are some people who do good for all. While some
7 stupids do nothing but destroys others property and hard work.
7
7 Bad people just blame the hard working people as they have
7 nothing in themselves. ...
_
About five months ago, I made some comments about an Edward
Winter biography. More recently I have not written anything at
Wikipedia that could be considered a Sam Sloan biography
deletion recommendation. Perhaps I should, but, for better or for
worse, I have not.
_
Sanny (softtanks@hotmail.com)
(NNTP-Posting-Host: 59.144.131.12)
wrote (5 Aug 2006 06:51:41 -0700):
7 ... One should not destroy other art work, litrature work. It
7 takes lot of time and money increating such biographies. If you
7 find mistake better is to suggest the author about your
7 problems instead deleteting books and biographies of others.
_
I have not deleted any books or biographies.
_
I suggest that Sanny take some time to learn more about how
Wikipedia works.
_
_
"... Please read the content at the following links very
carefully:
_
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Verifiability
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipe...te_your_sources
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipe...l_point_of_view
_
... Until you can prove all of these claims, they have no
business being in the article. Wikipedia is not a forum for you
to write articles chock full of your own opinions, speculations,
and rants. ..." - Howard Cheng (to Sam Sloan) (22:30,
3 March 2006 (UTC))
| |
| lblai@blackburn.edu 2006-08-05, 7:37 pm |
| Taylor Kingston wrote (5 Aug 2006 09:03:58 -0700):
7 Sanny, you understand nothing of the Sloan/Wikipedia situation.
7 Sam is doing no one any good. Follow the advice of the great
7 Phil Innes: "Beware these certainties when wiser men are
7 silent."
7 In other words, it's better not to butt in when you don't know
7 what's going on.
_
Phil Innes wrote (Sat, 05 Aug 2006 19:37:06 GMT):
7 Kingston doesn't recognise that the phrase means that if you
7 cannot add substantive material or some othe value of
7 appreciation, to shut your damned ignorant mouth.
7
7 That is also the issue with Wikipedia - if you can improve on the
7 biographies by all means do so [which does not mean having it
7 your own way] - but destroying them wholesale is wicked, and
7 the actions of boys, don't know and don't care fer nuthin'.
7
7 Why Kingston cannot accept such an adult view of things is
7 not my business, mine is simply to say that he is a sad
7 destructive lout, overconcerned about appearing good in public,
7 no matter who suffers.
7
7 In this instance, chess history suffers.
_
I suggest that Phil Innes take some time to learn more about
how Wikipedia works.
_
"... Please read the content at the following links very
carefully:
_
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Verifiability
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipe...te_your_sources
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipe...l_point_of_view
_
... Until you can prove all of these claims, they have no
business being in the article. Wikipedia is not a forum for you
to write articles chock full of your own opinions, speculations,
and rants. ..." - Howard Cheng (to Sam Sloan) (22:30,
3 March 2006 (UTC))
_
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Edward_G._Winter
_
Here is some of what I found at
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Verifiability :
_
"Editors adding new material to an article should cite
a reputable source, or it may be removed by any editor."
_
"The obligation to provide a reputable source lies with
the editors wishing to include the material, not on those
seeking to remove it."
_
"Remove unsourced material about living persons
immediately if it could be viewed as criticism"
|
| |
|
|