|
Home > Archive > Chess forum > November 2006 > I'm baaaaaaack!
You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread.
To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to
this thread please [click here]
|
|
| samsloan 2006-11-19, 9:06 pm |
| I'm baaaaaaack!
My computer hard drive failed early AM on Sunday, October 29, 2006,
just a few minutes after I had sent a bunch of emails.
Since then, until now, my only access to the Internet has been from the
public library.
I have now bought a new computer and have set it up. I need to thank a
donor for providing me with the funds to buy the new computer. He did
this to express his gratitude for the fine job he feels I have done
during my first three months as a member of the Executive Board of The
United States Chess Federation.
Although my new computer is working and I am back on-line again, I
still have not been able to recover the data on the hard drive that
failed. I have about 20 gigabytes of data on that hard drive, including
every email I have sent or received since 1997, plus several books I
have written which I have not yet published.
I will be continuing in my efforts to recover that hard drive.
Meanwhile, a new version of "The Fake Sam Sloan" who files from
ismailsloan@gmail.com has been posting dozens of nasty messages,
pretending to be me. There have been 98 such postings by him since
September 13, 2006, and at least 19 since my computer hard drive
failed. I hereby inform everybody that ALL of the postings under the
name "Sam Sloan" starting on October 29 to the present day, which is
November 11, 2006, have not been from me, except for postings under the
two headers:
Windows XP Home mup.sys problem
Vote Libertarian in New York
Please note that all other postings by Sam Sloan were fake.
All of the Fake Sam Sloan postings were objectionable, but the one I
find to be most objectionable is the one entitled "The XXXXX filed for
a divorce" .
This is absolutely untrue. I am living with my wife and our child (who
are asleep right now) in the Bronx. There is no indication that she
plans to file for divorce. As a witness, my son Peter Aravena Sloan (a
rated chess master) by a prior marriage has just spent two nights in my
apartment trying to fix my hard drive. (He has gone back to his own
home now.)
The reason I find the thread "The XXXXX filed for a divorce" to be even
more objectionable than the others is that it affects my wife and our
child and also it seems to be more believable than the others, most of
which are obviously fakes.
I find highly objectionable a posting by a member of the USCF Executive
Board that the postings by the Fake Sam Sloan are "amusing" and he
wishes that they were true. I do not find these postings to be one bit
funny and I feel that a member of the Executive Board should not make
such a comment, especially since these postings by the Fake Sam Sloan
are supposedly coming from a member of the Executive Board. I am
considering filing an ethics complaint against the board member who
stated that he was "amused" by the postings by the Fake Sam Sloan.
Then, we will see if the Ethics Committee finds his statements to be
amusing.
Sam Sloan
| |
| parrthenon@cs.com 2006-11-19, 9:06 pm |
| Sam,
Maybe the fake Sam Sloan and the fake Ray Gordon are the same.
samsloan wrote:
quote:
> I'm baaaaaaack!
>
> My computer hard drive failed early AM on Sunday, October 29, 2006,
> just a few minutes after I had sent a bunch of emails.
>
> Since then, until now, my only access to the Internet has been from the
> public library.
>
> I have now bought a new computer and have set it up. I need to thank a
> donor for providing me with the funds to buy the new computer. He did
> this to express his gratitude for the fine job he feels I have done
> during my first three months as a member of the Executive Board of The
> United States Chess Federation.
>
> Although my new computer is working and I am back on-line again, I
> still have not been able to recover the data on the hard drive that
> failed. I have about 20 gigabytes of data on that hard drive, including
> every email I have sent or receiMayved since 1997, plus several books I
> have written which I have not yet published.
>
> I will be continuing in my efforts to recover that hard drive.
>
> Meanwhile, a new version of "The Fake Sam Sloan" who files from
> ismailsloan@gmail.com has been posting dozens of nasty messages,
> pretending to be me. There have been 98 such postings by him since
> September 13, 2006, and at least 19 since my computer hard drive
> failed. I hereby inform everybody that ALL of the postings under the
> name "Sam Sloan" starting on October 29 to the present day, which is
> November 11, 2006, have not been from me, except for postings under the
> two headers:
> Windows XP Home mup.sys problem
> Vote Libertarian in New York
>
> Please note that all other postings by Sam Sloan were fake.
>
> All of the Fake Sam Sloan postings were objectionable, but the one I
> find to be most objectionable is the one entitled "The XXXXX filed for
> a divorce" .
>
> This is absolutely untrue. I am living with my wife and our child (who
> are asleep right now) in the Bronx. There is no indication that she
> plans to file for divorce. As a witness, my son Peter Aravena Sloan (a
> rated chess master) by a prior marriage has just spent two nights in my
> apartment trying to fix my hard drive. (He has gone back to his own
> home now.)
>
> The reason I find the thread "The XXXXX filed for a divorce" to be even
> more objectionable than the others is that it affects my wife and our
> child and also it seems to be more believable than the others, most of
> which are obviously fakes.
>
> I find highly objectionable a posting by a member of the USCF Executive
> Board that the postings by the Fake Sam Sloan are "amusing" and he
> wishes that they were true. I do not find these postings to be one bit
> funny and I feel that a member of the Executive Board should not make
> such a comment, especially since these postings by the Fake Sam Sloan
> are supposedly coming from a member of the Executive Board. I am
> considering filing an ethics complaint against the board member who
> stated that he was "amused" by the postings by the Fake Sam Sloan.
>
> Then, we will see if the Ethics Committee finds his statements to be
> amusing.
>
> Sam Sloan
| |
| samsloan 2006-11-19, 9:06 pm |
| parrthenon@cs.com wrote:
quote:
> Sam,
>
> Maybe the fake Sam Sloan and the fake Ray Gordon are the same.
I previously believed that, but now I believe that Paul Truong is the
Fake Sam Sloan.
Sam
| |
| Barney 2006-11-19, 9:06 pm |
| samsloan wrote:
quote:
> I'm baaaaaaack!
>
> My computer hard drive failed early AM on Sunday, October 29, 2006,
> just a few minutes after I had sent a bunch of emails.
>
> Since then, until now, my only access to the Internet has been from the
> public library.
>
> I have now bought a new computer and have set it up. I need to thank a
> donor for providing me with the funds to buy the new computer. He did
> this to express his gratitude for the fine job he feels I have done
> during my first three months as a member of the Executive Board of The
> United States Chess Federation.
>
> Although my new computer is working and I am back on-line again, I
> still have not been able to recover the data on the hard drive that
> failed. I have about 20 gigabytes of data on that hard drive, including
> every email I have sent or received since 1997, plus several books I
> have written which I have not yet published.
>
> I will be continuing in my efforts to recover that hard drive.
>
> Meanwhile, a new version of "The Fake Sam Sloan" who files from
> ismailsloan@gmail.com has been posting dozens of nasty messages,
> pretending to be me. There have been 98 such postings by him since
> September 13, 2006, and at least 19 since my computer hard drive
> failed. I hereby inform everybody that ALL of the postings under the
> name "Sam Sloan" starting on October 29 to the present day, which is
> November 11, 2006, have not been from me, except for postings under the
> two headers:
> Windows XP Home mup.sys problem
> Vote Libertarian in New York
>
> Please note that all other postings by Sam Sloan were fake.
>
> All of the Fake Sam Sloan postings were objectionable, but the one I
> find to be most objectionable is the one entitled "The XXXXX filed for
> a divorce" .
>
> This is absolutely untrue. I am living with my wife and our child (who
> are asleep right now) in the Bronx. There is no indication that she
> plans to file for divorce. As a witness, my son Peter Aravena Sloan (a
> rated chess master) by a prior marriage has just spent two nights in my
> apartment trying to fix my hard drive. (He has gone back to his own
> home now.)
>
> The reason I find the thread "The XXXXX filed for a divorce" to be even
> more objectionable than the others is that it affects my wife and our
> child and also it seems to be more believable than the others, most of
> which are obviously fakes.
>
> I find highly objectionable a posting by a member of the USCF Executive
> Board that the postings by the Fake Sam Sloan are "amusing" and he
> wishes that they were true. I do not find these postings to be one bit
> funny and I feel that a member of the Executive Board should not make
> such a comment, especially since these postings by the Fake Sam Sloan
> are supposedly coming from a member of the Executive Board. I am
> considering filing an ethics complaint against the board member who
> stated that he was "amused" by the postings by the Fake Sam Sloan.
>
> Then, we will see if the Ethics Committee finds his statements to be
> amusing.
>
> Sam Sloan
>
It's not the posting themselves that appear amusing. It's the way
people respond to them. The fact that you appear so obviously disturbed
is just encouraging more fake posts. The pseudo-proverb 'Do not feed
the trolls." applies here. Anyone with an IQ over 23 can tell which
posts are from 'the fake Sam Sloan'; it would be much more interesting
and damaging if someone posted fake posts that might be mistaken as from
you, but these people lack the subtlety to do that, so rather than
encouraging more posts, ignorance seems the best policy.
| |
| Ange1o DePa1ma 2006-11-19, 9:06 pm |
| "samsloan" <samhsloan@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1163261728.276024.27890@m73g2000cwd.googlegroups.com...
quote:
> parrthenon@cs.com wrote:
>
> I previously believed that, but now I believe that Paul Truong is the
> Fake Sam Sloan.
>
> Sam
Have you ever seen Ray Gordon, Sam Sloan, and Paul Truong in the same place?
Something to think about.
Wouldn't it be interesting if Ray Gordon were the fake Sam Sloan, Sam Sloan
the fake Paul Truong, and Paul Truong the fake Ray Gordon? How do we know
for sure this is not so?
Remember Tom Klem's alter ego? I don't remember the name. Isn't it kind of
perverted that Tom and I hated each other's guts when he posted as himself,
but we made up (I'm happy to say) after he started posting as the utterly
transparent Reno Rosalita?
| |
| Roly Poly Man 2006-11-19, 9:06 pm |
| "Ange1o DePa1ma" <Tom and I hated each other's guts when he posted as
himself,
quote:
> but we made up (I'm happy to say) after he started posting as the utterly
> transparent Reno Rosalita?
>
>
Isn't Tom Klem dead? Kind of sad that so many chess folks spend so much time
hating each other, and then death comes and what good was accomplished? Sam
Sloan and the rest of us are not getting any younger, less hate would be a
plus.
| |
| Duncan Oxley 2006-11-19, 9:06 pm |
|
"Ange1o DePa1ma" <angelodpnospam@nospam.gmail.com> wrote
quote:
> Remember Tom Klem's alter ego? I don't remember the name.
Jane Adams.
--Duncan
| |
| Wlodzimierz Holsztynski (wlod) 2006-11-19, 9:06 pm |
| Barney wrote:
quote:
> ignorance seems the best policy.
I beg your pardon?
(no, I have NOT written:
I back up your part hard on).
Regards,
Wlod
|
| |
|
|