| Ange1o DePa1ma 2006-11-19, 9:06 pm |
| BTW, three guys from my club estimated the rating of a complete beginner at
under 500. I agree with them.
"Ange1o DePa1ma" <angelodpnospam@nospam.gmail.com> wrote in message
news:u7ucnfFq56EPe9vYUSdV9g@ptd.net...
quote:
> Yes, I believe you're right. It's +/- 400 from the highest/lowest rated
> player you've faced. I'm sure there's some statistically valid reason for
> doing that, but it makes no sense to me. I guess they need a
> counter-balance for the fact that the player has not won (or lost, drawn).
>
> "Tom Martinak" <martinak_tom_m@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:1162246000.625031.311550@i42g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
>
>
|