|
Home > Archive > Chess forum > July 2005 > Philth's Damiano's Defense Fails
You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread.
To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to
this thread please [click here]
| Author |
Philth's Damiano's Defense Fails
|
|
| The Historian 2005-07-04, 8:34 pm |
|
Chess One wrote:
quote:
> Dear Bill,
>
> you are becoming rather insistent on personal matters at the expense of the
> ostensible subject - this is often interesting to only one party. If you
> don't want to play a money game, and you are quite strong, no? Then its all
> wordy speculation isn't it? And chess is about performance.
>
> Defeat the Damiano position after hrf8, or just talk. That's a second
> challenge.
>
> Phil
How about presenting analysis that supports your first claim, that it
is a "won end-game for Black"?
| |
| Chess One 2005-07-04, 8:34 pm |
|
"The Historian" <Spamscone@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1120501840.575706.161770@g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
quote:
>
>
> Chess One wrote:
>
> How about presenting analysis that supports your first claim, that it
> is a "won end-game for Black"?
Busy. Analyze it yourself. OTB, give yourself 20 minutes of real time. The
player a piece down has to cope with that, and after re-capturing a piece is
still the exchange down with busted King side pawns. This is what chess is
about, not a theoretical game at all, to repeat Mikhail Tal, a game played
against 2 ferocious lions, thine opponent and tick tick tick ...
Cordially, Phil
| |
| The Historian 2005-07-04, 8:34 pm |
|
Chess One wrote:
quote:
> "The Historian" <Spamscone@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:1120501840.575706.161770@g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
>
> Busy. Analyze it yourself.
I have, and once again you don't know what you are talking about. It's
not a win for Black.
OTB, give yourself 20 minutes of real time. The
quote:
> player a piece down has to cope with that, and after re-capturing a piece is
> still the exchange down with busted King side pawns. This is what chess is
> about, not a theoretical game at all, to repeat Mikhail Tal, a game played
> against 2 ferocious lions, thine opponent and tick tick tick ...
>
> Cordially, Phil
|
| |
|
|