|
Home > Archive > Chess forum > July 2005 > Old Sailors Tall Stories
You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread.
To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to
this thread please [click here]
| Author |
Old Sailors Tall Stories
|
|
| Chess One 2005-07-04, 8:34 pm |
|
<politikalhack@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1120498150.476533.238810@g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
quote:
>I would never get to this position in the Damiano: 3.d4 or 3.Bc4.
> 3.Nxe5 allows 3...Qe7. I ran through my MSA tournament results, and
> I'm fairly sure I lost more games to players under 1800 than you did.
> Mitigating factor: I played in 91 tournaments.
that's a lot! I remember as a kid being so nervous I would knock over half
the pieces with the first trembling move. We didn't play much tournament
chess in Cornwall, but a weekly club to club game of about 90/game, and then
weekend inter-county games slightly longer after a 2 hour car-ride in
pipe-smoke, the driver playing all others blindfold, so to speak. And I
remember Michael Adams as a 'squeeker' eg. of no particular account then,
and who could not be swindled but could be out-manoevred, in fact I am not
sure he even played board one for his club
what do you personally remember as the most enjoyable aspect of playing in
all those tournaments? - that is, as a consistent theme?
this Damiano game is a weird position anyway - when I saw f4 instead of h4 I
knew we were on strange ground, and Sam played as if responding to h4,
however, I often find myself in the wilderness. I once played a guy who is
old enough to have beaten Frank Marshall in a full length game, and rather
than the daunting task of playing against 50+ years of opening theory,
played an invention, The Great Crab, featuring b4 AND g4! It was a very
strange game, and the only one I ever played against a master where, after
40 moves, neither King had moved, and in the final position they still
hadn't moved [ROFL!] he was a very cool older gentleman and didn't buy any
of my crappy traps, so we slogged this thing out as an open game, open on
all fronts
Your turn for old-fart weird chess position anecdote, said Innes, who is 52
this week
quote:
> May I gently suggest that you are a person of integrity, and that
> Taylor Kingston is a person of integrity.
We are both import-Vermonters, except he is a flatlander, and I incidentally
just wrote to Taylor, to his [!]
And it is my surprise that you too are a gentleman, but said like that is
demeaning, which was not my intent, only the extent of my poor wits this
afternoon.
quote:
> ;-)
Now, unless we can think of other things on which to disagree we are forced
to agree on... <already a bad scene> the character of Lawrence H. Parr, but
as the children say, let's not go there.
Phil
| |
| The Historian 2005-07-04, 8:34 pm |
|
Chess One wrote:
quote:
> <politikalhack@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:1120498150.476533.238810@g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
>
> that's a lot! I remember as a kid being so nervous I would knock over half
> the pieces with the first trembling move. We didn't play much tournament
> chess in Cornwall, but a weekly club to club game of about 90/game, and then
> weekend inter-county games slightly longer after a 2 hour car-ride in
> pipe-smoke, the driver playing all others blindfold, so to speak. And I
> remember Michael Adams as a 'squeeker' eg. of no particular account then,
> and who could not be swindled but could be out-manoevred, in fact I am not
> sure he even played board one for his club
>
> what do you personally remember as the most enjoyable aspect of playing in
> all those tournaments? - that is, as a consistent theme?
>
> this Damiano game is a weird position anyway - when I saw f4 instead of h4 I
> knew we were on strange ground, and Sam played as if responding to h4,
> however, I often find myself in the wilderness. I once played a guy who is
> old enough to have beaten Frank Marshall in a full length game,
How many decades after he beat Frank Marshall did you play him?
and rather
quote:
> than the daunting task of playing against 50+ years of opening theory,
> played an invention, The Great Crab, featuring b4 AND g4! It was a very
> strange game, and the only one I ever played against a master where, after
> 40 moves, neither King had moved, and in the final position they still
> hadn't moved [ROFL!] he was a very cool older gentleman and didn't buy any
> of my crappy traps, so we slogged this thing out as an open game, open on
> all fronts
>
> Your turn for old-fart weird chess position anecdote, said Innes, who is 52
> this week
>
>
> We are both import-Vermonters, except he is a flatlander, and I incidentally
> just wrote to Taylor, to his [!]
>
> And it is my surprise that you too are a gentleman, but said like that is
> demeaning, which was not my intent, only the extent of my poor wits this
> afternoon.
>
>
> Now, unless we can think of other things on which to disagree we are forced
> to agree on... <already a bad scene> the character of Lawrence H. Parr, but
> as the children say, let's not go there.
>
> Phil
| |
| Chess One 2005-07-04, 8:34 pm |
|
"The Historian" <Spamscone@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1120501264.847527.202090@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
quote:
>
>
> Chess One wrote:
>
> How many decades after he beat Frank Marshall did you play him?
Seemed like 200 decades at the time, but then again he was playing above 2
masters at board 1, Russian imports to UMass - probably, in truth, an
honorary position.
It is funny, several people have written me that Mr. Bob Bornholz was a very
congenial gentleman, but he let me know without a smile or much other
consideration that he was there for business!
ha ha ha ha
Very cool old dude. Can't remember how old he was but definitely ancient. In
a way I wish I had achieved draw instead of the actual result. It didn't
matter to me so much, and it may have mattered much to him.
I had another game like this when I offered a draw to an IM during a simul
when I had a long but forced mate OTB. When I was a kid I would have taken
their throats! As an adult this has become an interesting conundrum, Neil.
Something, eh, something like...
O, it is excellent
To have a giant's strength; but it is tyrannous
To use it like a giant.
/MfM
Cordially! Phil
| |
| politikalhack@gmail.com 2005-07-04, 8:34 pm |
| <<what do you personally remember as the most enjoyable aspect of
playing in
all those tournaments? - that is, as a consistent theme? >>
That's easy--the post-mortems.
Like many players from the Midwest, I have happy memories of analyzing
with two friends now gone--Bill Colias and Dr. Eugene Martinovsky.
| |
| Chess One 2005-07-04, 8:34 pm |
|
<politikalhack@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1120506979.130745.135970@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
quote:
> <<what do you personally remember as the most enjoyable aspect of
> playing in
> all those tournaments? - that is, as a consistent theme? >>
>
> That's easy--the post-mortems.
Really?!
quote:
> Like many players from the Midwest, I have happy memories of analyzing
> with two friends now gone--Bill Colias and Dr. Eugene Martinovsky.
More! Come on, tell us about it.
A few years ago I analysed a game with Ivanov [Boston] and bust him! He was
quite bemused.
Phil
| |
| The Historian 2005-07-04, 8:34 pm |
|
politikalhack@gmail.com wrote:
quote:
> <<what do you personally remember as the most enjoyable aspect of
> playing in
> all those tournaments? - that is, as a consistent theme? >>
>
> That's easy--the post-mortems.
>
> Like many players from the Midwest, I have happy memories of analyzing
> with two friends now gone--Bill Colias and Dr. Eugene Martinovsky.
Bill, I've enjoyed the memorial book on Mr. Colias. I think it was a
touching tribute on the part of the IL chess community.
| |
| politikalhack@gmail.com 2005-07-04, 8:34 pm |
| <<Bill, I've enjoyed the memorial book on Mr. Colias. I think it was a
touching tribute on the part of the IL chess community. >>
Afterword by Larry Parr.
| |
| The Historian 2005-07-04, 8:34 pm |
|
politikalhack@gmail.com wrote:
quote:
> <<Bill, I've enjoyed the memorial book on Mr. Colias. I think it was a
> touching tribute on the part of the IL chess community. >>
>
> Afterword by Larry Parr.
I try to forget that fact. As usual, it told us more about Parr than
about his subject-matter.
| |
| politikalhack@gmail.com 2005-07-04, 8:34 pm |
| In the post-mortem to my last game with Gene, he very politely gave me
a lesson in defending the Exchange QGD, including (I kid you not) a
reading list. In the game itself, I succeeded in creating more chaos
than I deserved to create. When we got to that point in the
post-mortem, Gene flagged down a friend for analytical
assistance--Lembit Oll.
I wish I could have lost many more such games to him....
|
| |
|
|