Home > Archive > Chess forum > May 2005 > Re: USCF Executive Board Meeting, Part 2, 5/22





You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread. To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to this thread please [click here]

Author Re: USCF Executive Board Meeting, Part 2, 5/22
samsloan

2005-05-25, 8:35 pm

halterrie@worldnet.att.net wrote:
quote:

> USCF Executive Board Meeting, Sunday 5/22
>
> Here is my report on the second open session of the Executive Board
> Meeting, held 5/22 in Minneapolis from 3-5 PM.
>
> The meeting opened with Marinello, Schultz, Bauer and Shaughnessy in
> attendance. Steve Shutt arrived a few minutes later and Tim Hanke
> joined by telephone a little after that. Once again, there were a lot
> of numbers tossed around and, while I tried to copy them all down, I
> may have made errors.
>
> AWARDS
>
> Winners of the various awards to be handed out at the U.S. Open were
> announced. The usual suspects.
>
> SCHOLASTIC COUNCIL
>
> The results of an election for three open seats on the Council were
> announced. Two of the top three finishers are also candidates for the
> Executive Board; if either is elected he will be replaced on the
> Council by the next highest finisher. The top five:
> 1. Robert Tanner
> 2. Mike Nietman
> 3. Steve Shutt
> 4. Mikhail Korenman
> 5. John Haskell
>
> ANNOUNCEMENT
>
> Beatriz Marinello announced that her stint as office COO will end on
> May 31, 2005.
>
> CONTRACTS MOTION
>
> A subsitute motion for the one considered yesterday was read by Randy
> Bauer. For contracts of over $10,000 written approval of the USCF
> President must be obtained. Contracts of $30,000 or more will require
> approval of the full Executive Board. This policy will be published

in
quote:

> every issue of Chess Life and on the USCF web site.
> PASSED 3-0-1, with Shutt and Hanke absent and Marinello abstaining.
>
> U.S. OPEN
>
> The workshop schedule for the U.S. Open was approved. There were only
> copies of this for the EB, so I don't know what was in it.
>
> CROSSVILLE BUILDING
>
> Elizabeth Shaughnessy reported. All of the architect's and engineer's
> drawings are done. Shaughnessy explained how some people got the

wrong
quote:

> impression that a non-bidding contractor would be used, who is an
> associate of the architect. It is a normal pre-bid procedure
> to take the drawings to a single contractor, who will NOT be bidding

on
quote:

> the job, for a preliminary cost estimate. Adjustments can then be

made
quote:

> to the design if needed. Then the job is opened for 3-4 bids.
>
> The pre-bid estimate was quite high, for an unexpected reason. The
> building itself was not too costly but the plans for the surrounding
> land turned out to be expensive because of solid rock discovered only

a
quote:

> few inches down, making digging difficult. Changes were made to the
> plans to reduce cost in this area. Planned parking spaces were cut

from
quote:

> 33 to 24 and a few other steps were taken. This resulted in a savings
> of about $89,000 off the preliminary estimate.
>
> The final pre-bid estimate after the changes is $561,000. Shaughnessy
> reported that for a projest of this size, it is usual to allow for an
> overage of 5%. Bids will now be solicited from 3-4 Tennessee
> contractors. Ground breaking will be in August 2005 with the building
> expected to be complete in March or April of 2006.
>
> Steve Shutt proposed an EB motion, naming Elizabeth Shaughnessy the
> official EB liaison to the architect, with full authority to move the
> project forward.
> This PASSED 5-0-1, Shaughnessy abstaining.
>
> BANK LOANS
>
> Beatriz Marinello met with four Tennessee banks, resulting in written
> loan proposals from two of them. There were no copies of these
> documents for spectators, so what follows is based only on my notes,
> which may contain errors both of fact and of understanding.
>
> One bank offered a loan for the full cost of construction, the other
> set a cap of $500,000. The interest rate for either would be 5 or

5.5%,
quote:

> I'm not sure which. As for a permanent loan or mortgage, both banks
> were offering a fixed rate of 7.25% for 15 years. They also offered
> some adjustable rate options, such as 3 years at 5.875% or 6%. There
> was also an offer of 5 years at 6.25%.
>
> One of the spectators was Joel Channing, who has extensive experience
> with loan arrangements of this type. He was asked to look at the
> documents and had some questions, such as whether there are any
> pre-payment penalties. It was agreed by the EB that Channing and

Randy
quote:

> Bauer will call the banks together to clear up the uncertainties.
>
> BUDGET
>
> Some new facts emerged about this preliminary budget, which is due to
> be finalized by June 21st. As currently designed, the budget has a
> surplus of $630,000, not including any B+E revenue, which is being
> taken off budget. This was so astonishing that I raised my hand and
> asked if I had understood correctly. I had.
>
> Other items of interest:
>
> 1. The architect's fee will be $40,000.
> 2. The Publications Dept. will remain in New Windsor until the new
> building is ready. Estimated cost of that move is $10,000 but may be
> less, as the USCF has earned a free moving load from the company

which
quote:

> handled the previous moving activity.
> 3. The renegotiation with Hanon Russell is continuing. No other

details
quote:

> are available for public release.
>
> Eric Schiller then addressed the EB. He stated that he represented a
> number of authors, including all of those handled by Cardoza
> Publishing, plus John Watson, Danny Kopec, Arnold Denker, Raymond

Keene
quote:

> etc. They jointly charge that Hanon Russell has excluded their books
> and other products from his inventory, for purely political reasons.

He
quote:

> stated that attempts to contact Russell directly about this had been
> ignored. Schiller requested free advertising in Chess Life to help

make
quote:

> up for lost sales. He threatened to organize a boycott of USCF sales

at
quote:

> national tournaments if he didn't get satisfaction.
>
> The EB had questions, such as:
>
> 1. What if Russell states that it isn't politics, the books just

don't
quote:

> meet his standards as potential good sellers? Schiller replied that

he
quote:

> can provide royalty records proving that the books in question are

good
quote:

> sellers. Elizabeth Shaughnessy noted that she could confirm that
> Russell had not replied to a direct inquiry from Schiller.
>
> 2. Is there anything the EB can really do? Does it have the right to
> force inventory on Russell? Elizabeth Shaughnessy read aloud the
> applicable section of the agreement with Chess Cafe. I couldn't get

it
quote:

> all down but it was something like this: "Chess Cafe shall accept
> input from USCF ... to provide satisfaction to USCF members." Exactly
> just what this means is not clear. Joel Channing suggested that USCF
> could use the renegotiation with Russell as leverage to get

concessions
quote:

> on this issue but Beatriz Marinello was reluctant to take such an
> approach.
>
> The EB agreed to investigate and appointed Steve Shutt to handle it.
> Eric Schiller will submit a brief. No promises were made about Chess
> Life ads.
>
> That was the last item of substance. The EB adjourned shortly before

5
quote:

> PM.
>
> One more time, I remind you that this is not an official report and
> thus may contain errors, both of fact and of interpretation.
>
> -- Hal Terrie


Another disturbing report, especially the part that states: "The
pre-bid estimate was quite high, for an unexpected reason. The building
itself was not too costly but the plans for the surrounding land turned
out to be expensive because of solid rock discovered only a few inches
down, making digging difficult. Changes were made to the plans to
reduce cost in this area. Planned parking spaces were cut from 33 to 24
and a few other steps were taken. This resulted in a savings of about
$89,000 off the preliminary estimate. The final pre-bid estimate after
the changes is $561,000. Shaughnessy reported that for a projest of
this size, it is usual to allow for an overage of 5%."

The oiriginal price was supposed to be $360,000. Now it is up to
$561,000 and expected to rise. This for a building that is one third
the size of the building we sold for less in New Windsor.

Did not any of the board members blink when they heard these figures,
or are they all crazy, stupid, evil or not caring?

Sam Sloan

Copyright 2003 - 2008 gamesreviews.net Software forum  PC Hardware reviews