| Sam Sloan 2005-04-23, 3:31 am |
| On 16 Apr 2005 14:54:40 -0700, "Grant Perks" <gperks2@aol.com> wrote:
quote:
>Sam,
>
>There is a building to the east of the supposed "wetland" that is just
>about as close as the one that the USCF is planning will be.
>
>While I don't pretend to know the Tennessee definition of a wetland,
>there can't be much of an issue over this puddle on the property line.
>
>GRant
You may prove to be correct. However, just about everybody familiar
with the situation in Tennessee says otherwise.
For example, Steve Owens who posts as "Steve from Tennessee" on my
email group has consistently been one of the strongest supporters of
the move to Crossville.
However, now that he has found out that there is a wetlands issue, he
seems to be hesitant.
Similarly, Rob Mitchell on this group has been a long time supporter
of the move to Crossville but now he is not sure either.
Rob is also the person who informed us of the nudist colony.
Leshaun Fossett, a Libertarian Party member fromTennessee with whom I
correspond privately, seems to believe that we will likely not be
allowed to build on this property.
A lawyer whom I met in the New York Appellate Division Second
Department yesterday seemed quite sure that we will not be able to
build in Tennessee and he was talking about starting a class action
over this.
So, the opinion of Randy Bauer and Elizabeth Shaughnessy, neither of
whom know anything about Tennessee, does not count much compared to
this weight of authority.
Sam Sloan
|