Home > Archive > Chess forum > March 2005 > Re: Questions for Mr. Bauer (the true leader of the USCF)





You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread. To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to this thread please [click here]

Author Re: Questions for Mr. Bauer (the true leader of the USCF)
Sam Sloan

2005-03-22, 4:05 am

On 21 Mar 2005 21:18:24 -0800, "George John" <george@neosoft.com>
wrote:
quote:

>parrthenon@cs.com wrote:
>
>Larry,
>
>[SNIP]
>
>(though
>for
>
>I believe that *everyone* in a USCF leadership role should be held
>accountable for his or her actions. I expect *everyone* in a USCF
>leadership role to conduct themselves in a civil manner at all times
>especially Executive Board members. IMHO, WRT civility, the history of
>our USCF leadership is well below satisfactory. I would like that to
>change.
>
>Should I be elected to the board, I will do my very best to understand
>and follow the "Standards of Conduct for the USCF Executive Board", and
>hold my fellow board members accountable for doing the same.
>
>WRT any alleged inappropriate behavior of EB committee chairs, that
>issue, like other confidential areas such as personnel decisions, legal
>matters, and choosing committee members, should be discussed in
>private, and dealt with in private. I am honestly stunned that an EB
>member would offer a motion like this that concerned one of his
>committee chairs. IMO, the appropriate action would be for the
>committee's EB liaison to call the committee chair up on the phone or
>send him an e-mail message. If future behavior remained
>unsatisfactory, I would discuss this in closed session, and if deemed
>appropriate, make a motion naming who the chair(s) of the committee
>will be, and vote on that, and that alone.
>
>While I will not attempt to make excuses for the behavior of any
>individual, to single out an individual in this manner is like blaming
>a drop of water for making the ocean wet. That's how poor my opinion
>is of far too much of the culture and history of USCF politics.
>
>I value the reputation of the USCF. I think its reputation is a key
>part of its success or failure. I call on all current and future board
>members and those who represent the USCF to do their very best in
>maintaining their civility to others, even in the face of uncivil
>behavior. Yes, it's fine to defend oneself, offer constructive
>criticism, and hold others accountable. Let's just do it in as civil a
>manner as is possible please.
>
>[SNIP]
>
>Best regards,
>
>George John


George John running for election as a member of the Marinello slate
gives us five paragraphs of high falutin horseshit as ususal.

Answer the question: In view of the fact that Stan Booz Co--Chairman
of the USCF Audit Committee, called Al Lawrence an "XXXXXXX" on this
newsgroup and called USCF Secretary Frank Brady a "big prick" on this
newsgroup, do you feel that Stan Booz should be allowed to keep his
important committee positions?

Yes or No. I do not want to hear any other answers.

Please note that if you answer no you will be alienating the group you
claim to be a member of because Stan Booz is a political ally and an
apointee of Beatriz Marinello whom you support, but if you answer yes
you will have proven yourself to be the shithead that those of us who
know you well know that you really are.

Sam Sloan
Copyright 2003 - 2008 gamesreviews.net Software forum  PC Hardware reviews