|
Home > Archive > Chess forum > October 2005 > Kingston-Sloan Chess Challenge
You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread.
To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to
this thread please [click here]
| Author |
Kingston-Sloan Chess Challenge
|
|
| Garth Bader 2005-10-31, 7:42 pm |
| Kingston said:"So, Sam -- when may we expect those "immediate corrections"
you are
supposedly famous for? Have you updated your Wikipedia entry to remove the
errors? I realize that would not leave much, but a man's gotta do what a
man's gotta do."<<<
Them thar is FIGHTIN WORDS. Sounds like your mouth wrote a check that your
brain can't cash. Sam Sloan can still kick your XXX on any side of a Chess
Board.
Accept Sam Sloan's Chess Challenge OR CONCEDE Defeat and admit that you,
Taylor Kingston, are the Weakest Link.
| |
| parrthenon@cs.com 2005-10-31, 11:40 pm |
| THE WEAKEST LINK
<Accept Sam Sloan's Chess Challenge OR CONCEDE Defeat and admit that
you, Taylor Kingston, are the Weakest Link.> -- "Garth Bader"
I have no doubt that Sam will make corrections
to the Whitaker piece at Wikipedia, and he may even
thank NM Taylor Kingston, the 1800-rated player who
claimed to be 2300+ ELO for the emendations.
However, I do not expect NM Kingston to correct
the, ah, error he made about his own rating. Nor do
we expect him to answer whether he was Xylothist,
defending himself under a false name when the
intellectual heat got too hot under his own name.
Sam will do the right thing. I'm certain
that NM Kingston will not.
|
| |
|
|