Home > Archive > Chess forum > January 2005 > Re: We were lied to





You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread. To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to this thread please [click here]

Author Re: We were lied to
Sam Sloan

2005-01-20, 9:48 am

On Thu, 20 Jan 2005 09:17:35 -0500, "StanB" <stanbooz@comXXXcast.net>
wrote:
quote:

>
>"Sam Sloan" <sloan@ishipress.com> wrote in message
>news:41efbc19.3923031@ca.news.verio.net...
>
>
>Sure he does. I propose that in the future we require a performance bond.


He would probably agree to that, provided that he knows exactly what
he is getting in return.

When the board put the books and equipment up for bids in December,
2003 and gave bidders only three days to respond, it provided
absolutely no information about what was being offered.

Sam Sloan
Copyright 2003 - 2008 gamesreviews.net Software forum  PC Hardware reviews