Home > Archive > Chess politics > January 2007 > Re: Chessville Vignettes





You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread. To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to this thread please [click here]

Author Re: Chessville Vignettes
Rob

2007-01-30, 8:26 pm



On Jan 21, 1:19 am, "help bot" <nomorech...@hotmail.com> wrote:
quote:

> Rob wrote:
>
> smart!
>
> is best left to the experts. For one thing, this way you are able to
> save
> a whole step in the process (the one where a multitude of factual
> errors
> are later corrected by people who actually have some real facts).
> Saving
> steps means less work, and I am all for that.
>
> However, I would be willing to check over (as if Fritz could not do
> this
> a thousand times better) any chess analysis for obvious blunders, such
> as the one in which GM Soltis -- after bragging that he took great care
> in
> compiling one book of chess games -- overlooked a simple capture of a
> free Rook by the deeply hidden: "pxR -- duh!"
>
> I get a lot of emails these days, and it seems to me that were I
> given
> just *five minutes* to look over any one of them, I could easily spot
> most
> of the errors and correct them before they are sent out to *thousands*
> of
> recipients. Yet it always seems to be the case that these writers have
> LARGE egos, and cannot recognize the need for any improvement in their
> wares whatever. In fact, many of these newsletters, as I shall call
> them,
> contradict one another as to the facts, or at the very least, take the
> same
> set of facts and from them draw opposing positions which their writers
> cling to like a fish to water.
>
> Hey, if Tinker Taylor gets to call himself smarter than the average
> bear,
> then why can't I call myself smart bot? Who's higher-rated at GetClub,
> me or him? Who just made the egregious error (ooooh, it feels so good
> to be able to use that word in this particular context) of wrongly
> assuming
> that a writer must have meant only Frank Marshall's *tournament* games?
> Who "overlooked" pxR, me or him? Whose horrid oversight was spotted
> by that obnoxious GM, Ray Keene? Who miscalculated his correspondence
> rating as "2300+" -- missing by at least 2%, me or him? Obviously,
> when
> you can answer these questions, it will become cristal cleer which of
> us to
> has earned the right to call himself smartt.
>
> -- help bot


Bot-

Just wanted to let you know that there are several folks out there
that are deciding not to write anything for Vignettes because of
attacks both online and via personal communications from many self
professed chess historians/experts. It'a a shame. But I guess it's
alot like the line from the Bob Marley song "I Shot The Sheriff" : "He
said 'Kill it before it grows" !

Copyright 2003 - 2008 gamesreviews.net Software forum  PC Hardware reviews