| Louis Blair 2006-08-21, 7:37 pm |
| Taylor Kingston wrote (20 Aug 2006 07:47:11 -0700):
7 ... Phil, who gets easily confused about people (e.g.
7 Brady/Lawrence, Tapper/Dowd), dates (1938/1948,
7 1974/1978/1981), and even his own identity ("I'm not
7 your boy!", written in angry reply to himself).
_
With regard to "Tapper/Dowd",
Phil Innes wrote (Sun, 20 Aug 2006 18:55:21 GMT):
7 ... [Taylor Kingston] is also not very attentive to the
7 now repeated joke, that this 'confusion' is somewhat
7 deliberated about people who all sound the same - I
7 only wrote this a few times - maybe it'll take 6?
_
Raise your hand if you thought Phil Innes was making
a joke when he publicly accused "Dr D" of snipping
a question that, in reality, had been directed by Phil
Innes to Larry Tapper.
_
"... I extended Dr D an invitation ...
_
A specific on Soviet-era affairs was if he
had read the Gulko MSS, but in his
response he eliminated even the
question, while maintaining his superiority
over others by ..." - Phil Innes (Sun,
06 Aug 2006 12:03:14 GMT)
_
The reality:
_
"... Larry ...
...
let me ... ask, BTW, if you have read
Gulko's manuscript? ..." - Phil Innes
(Fri, 04 Aug 2006 19:10:28 GMT)
_
And what about the time when he told us that "Dowd"
had "backed off" of a challenge that had actually
been made by Larry Tapper?
_
"... Since I seem to have accepted Dread
Dowd's challenge not for a few games but a
week of games, he himself backed off, and
has never made any contact - which is much
as I thought it would be. ..." - Phil Innes
(Sat, 12 Aug 2006 15:15:16 GMT)
_
"... I never asked to play chess against [Phil
Innes], that was Larry Tapper. ..." - jamesrynd
(12 Aug 2006 09:46:27 -0700)
_
Indeed, without much trouble, one can find:
_
"I would like to propose a grudge match between
me and Phil Innes." - Larry Tapper (20 Apr 2006
06:32:59 -0700)
_
Does Phil Innes want us to remember that he thinks
it is funny to publicly accuse people of things that
they did not do?
_
After quoting the references to the "I'm not your boy!"
incident, Phil Innes wrote (Sun, 20 Aug 2006
18:55:21 GMT):
7 What's so funny about not being in anyone's pocket?
7 You trying out for the Winterette's?
_
Here is a rerun:
_
"... I am not interested in the cut and deplore routine.
If you have something to say to standards of public
decency to children and women, David, write them.
Otherwise, you may do the other thing." - Phil Innes
(Mon, 03 Apr 2006 19:40:30 GMT)
_
_
_
"...
quote:
> I am not interested in the cut and deplore
routine.
quote:
> If you have something to say to standards of
public
quote:
> decency to children and women, David, write
them.
quote:
> Otherwise, you may do the other thing.
_
I have nothing to say, in a chess newsgroup,
about 'standards of public decency to children
and women'. ..." - David Kane (Mon, 3 Apr 2006
16:43:33 -0700)
_
_
_
"...
quote:
> routine.
> public
> them.
_
I am not your boy! I already wrote a basis for an
approach - but no one seems actually interested
enough in the subject to engage it. ..." - Phil Innes
(Tue, 04 Apr 2006 13:06:06 GMT)
_
_
_
"It appears Mr. Innes is talking to himself again.
And what's more, he's taking offense at his own
words. How long until he accuses himself of
self-stalking?" - Neil Brennen (4 Apr 2006
16:53:19 -0700)
|