Home > Archive > Chess politics > August 2006 > Re: Standards in Chess Journalism





You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread. To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to this thread please [click here]

Author Re: Standards in Chess Journalism
parrthenon@cs.com

2006-08-02, 10:44 pm

LOVIN' IT HERE

My copy of Duras Vitezi, a paperback volume in
Czech that was issued, if memory serves, during WWII,
is in storage in New York. Does anyone on this forum
know how that volume treats the position on move 43 in
Duras-Teichmann?

On other fronts, Randy Bauer is currently in
remission, his spasm having subsided. NM Taylor
Kingston, our self-proclaimed 2300+ ELO creature
who is actually rated 1800, will not answer whether he
posted in praise of himself as Xylothist and Paulie
Graf and whether such activity accords with his
"standards," as he used the word.

Louie Blair has taken to excerpting predictions of mine
out of context. I have, in some part, restored the prose
that surrounded the predictions, noting the conditionals
and the subjunctives. This latest exercise by our Louie
indicates further deterioration on his part. His canker and
chancre are especially gratifying as he seeks escape from,
well ... you name it.

These guys have been given plenty of rope.

I'm lovin' it here.

Copyright 2003 - 2009 gamesreviews.net Software forum  PC Hardware reviews