|
Home > Archive > Chess politics > March 2006 > Serial Vexatious Litigant?
You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread.
To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to
this thread please [click here]
| Author |
Serial Vexatious Litigant?
|
|
| Freedom of Speech 2006-03-07, 7:34 pm |
| You decide. As posted by "Editorial Staff", this deserves it's
own thread:
Here is Gordon Roy Parker's ENTIRE record:
1) Parker v. Dryer. (1998)
Settled for approximately $200.00
2) Parker v. Rodwell. (1998)
Dismissed. Incorrect defendant listed.
3) Parker v. Daily Pennsylvanian, Eric Tilles, et. al. (2003)
Dismissed. Nonsuit granted by Court.
4) Parker v. "Wintermute", & 200 John Does, (2003)
Dismissed. Failed to locate or serve any defendants.
5) Parker v. university of Pennsylvania. (2004)
Dismissed. Parker refused court-ordered psych evaluation.
6) Parker v. Learn the Skills, et.al. (2005)
Dismissed. Failed to state claim upon which relief can be
granted.
7) Parker v. Comcast High-Speed Internet et. al. (2005)
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER THAT THE PETITION OF GORDON ROY PARKER
TO PERPETUATE TESTIMONY PURSUANT TO RULE 27 OF THE FEDERAL
RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE IS DENIED; ETC... SIGNED BY JUDGE
HARVEY BARTLE III ON 9/27/05. 9/27/05 ENTERED AND COPIES
MAILED
TO PRO SE.(jl, ) (Entered: 09/27/2005)
In other words, DISMISSED.
8) Parker v. Google. (2005) (50,000 John Does)
MTD filed, Dismissal pending.
9) Parker v. LTSC, et. al. II (2003)
Dismissed. Defendant (Parker) failed to comply with Court's
Memorandum and Order. Did not meet "short and plain statement"
Requirement, Failed to State Claim upon which relief can be
granted.
| |
| Ray Gordon 2006-03-07, 7:34 pm |
| Dare to show your real face? I will sue you too.
| |
| Ray Gordon 2006-03-07, 7:34 pm |
| not true, there are 753 new motions to be filed and argued. Then there is
SCOTUS
"Freedom of Speech" <thrasher@reece.net.au> wrote in message
news:V3AWV31O38783.9390509259@reece.net.au...
quote:
> You decide. As posted by "Editorial Staff", this deserves it's
> own thread:
>
> Here is Gordon Roy Parker's ENTIRE record:
>
> 1) Parker v. Dryer. (1998)
> Settled for approximately $200.00
>
> 2) Parker v. Rodwell. (1998)
> Dismissed. Incorrect defendant listed.
>
> 3) Parker v. Daily Pennsylvanian, Eric Tilles, et. al. (2003)
> Dismissed. Nonsuit granted by Court.
>
> 4) Parker v. "Wintermute", & 200 John Does, (2003)
> Dismissed. Failed to locate or serve any defendants.
>
> 5) Parker v. university of Pennsylvania. (2004)
> Dismissed. Parker refused court-ordered psych evaluation.
>
> 6) Parker v. Learn the Skills, et.al. (2005)
> Dismissed. Failed to state claim upon which relief can be
> granted.
>
> 7) Parker v. Comcast High-Speed Internet et. al. (2005)
> MEMORANDUM AND ORDER THAT THE PETITION OF GORDON ROY PARKER
> TO PERPETUATE TESTIMONY PURSUANT TO RULE 27 OF THE FEDERAL
> RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE IS DENIED; ETC... SIGNED BY JUDGE
> HARVEY BARTLE III ON 9/27/05. 9/27/05 ENTERED AND COPIES
> MAILED
> TO PRO SE.(jl, ) (Entered: 09/27/2005)
>
> In other words, DISMISSED.
>
> 8) Parker v. Google. (2005) (50,000 John Does)
> MTD filed, Dismissal pending.
>
> 9) Parker v. LTSC, et. al. II (2003)
> Dismissed. Defendant (Parker) failed to comply with Court's
> Memorandum and Order. Did not meet "short and plain statement"
> Requirement, Failed to State Claim upon which relief can be
> granted.
>
>
*** Free account sponsored by SecureIX.com ***
*** Encrypt your Internet usage with a free VPN account from http://www.SecureIX.com ***
| |
| Freedom of Speech 2006-03-07, 7:34 pm |
| In article <440da8f0$0$1101$6d36acad@titian.nntpserver.com>
"Ray Gordon" <imablither...@idiot.com> wrote:
quote:
>
> not true, there are 753 new motions to be filed and argued. Then there is
> SCOTUS
Exactly What statement is untrue? Future events, pipe dreams or
not, do not change the facts.
And we know your record with SCOTUS. Same as your record in the
lower courts (detailed below).
[vbcol=seagreen]
> "Freedom of Speech" <thras...@reece.net.au> wrote in message
> news:V3AWV31O38783.9390509259@reece.net.au...
| |
| Freedom of Speech 2006-03-07, 7:34 pm |
| In article <440da8f0$0$1101$6d36acad@titian.nntpserver.com>
"Ray Gordon" <imablither...@idiot.com> wrote:
quote:
>
> not true, there are 753 new motions to be filed and argued. Then there is
> SCOTUS
Exactly What statement is untrue? Future events, pipe dreams or
not, do not change the facts.
And we know your record with SCOTUS. Same as your record in the
lower courts (detailed below).
[vbcol=seagreen]
> "Freedom of Speech" <thras...@reece.net.au> wrote in message
> news:V3AWV31O38783.9390509259@reece.net.au...
| |
| arbitry@gmail.com 2006-03-07, 7:34 pm |
| FOS - sorry to break it to you, but the guy posting is making fun of
Ray; ray has no space ("RayGordon"). What's XXXXed up is how good he is
at it (and how little we expect from gordon)
| |
| HeeroYuy 2006-03-07, 7:34 pm |
|
<arbitry@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1141771335.197165.185980@i39g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
quote:
> FOS - sorry to break it to you, but the guy posting is making fun of
> Ray; ray has no space ("RayGordon"). What's XXXXed up is how good he is
> at it (and how little we expect from gordon)
>
It won't take the copycat long to eliminate the space in the name to make
the funny parodies 99.95% spot on.
| |
| followthewatch55 2006-03-07, 11:37 pm |
| In the Google case, they even called him a serial litigant lol.
-followthewatch
| |
| Odious 2006-03-07, 11:37 pm |
|
<arbitry@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1141771335.197165.185980@i39g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
quote:
> FOS - sorry to break it to you, but the guy posting is making fun of
> Ray; ray has no space ("RayGordon"). What's XXXXed up is how good he is
> at it (and how little we expect from gordon)
>
Ray has a long history of posting under numerous different screen name
variations... as ISPs periodically cancel his accounts for spamming and crap
like that.
| |
| John C. Randolph 2006-03-18, 7:32 pm |
| On 2006-03-07 07:27:45 -0800, "Ray Gordon" <raygordon@writeme.com> said:
quote:
> Dare to show your real face? I will sue you too.
I'm sure they're just quaking in their boots for fear of your balsa gavel, grp.
-jcr
| |
| Andrew Zito 2006-03-18, 7:32 pm |
| Stop making fun of the mental headcase.
|
| |
|
|