| Louis Blair 2006-02-26, 7:33 pm |
| Phil Innes wrote (Wed, 22 Feb 2006 23:07:23 GMT):
quote:
> If it is a managerial [position], then the by-laws required
> her brother to resign, if not and the job comprises a
> technical postion of editing and content supply, why
> the fuss?
_
"in the 'agreements made' language
[of the 'Standards of Conduct for USCF
Executive Board'].
_
'(2) (a) Except where noted below, no
Executive Board member or a member
of his immediate family may receive
financial compensation from the USCF
for any reason, except for standard
reimbursement of expenses, during
his tenure on the Board, or for two
years after completing his tenure if
such compensation results from bids
accepted or agreements made by the
Board during his tenure. In claiming
expense reimbursement, a Board
member must claim only that portion
of expenses that were incurred in
non-political activities that were a
legitimate exercise of the Board
member's duties.'" - Grant Perks
(08 Oct 2004 23:52:55 GMT)
_
I do not see anything in this to distinguish
between "managerial" and "technical" postions.
_
Phil Innes wrote (Wed, 22 Feb 2006 23:07:23 GMT):
quote:
> the position itself - what is its salary?
_
"If the salary is a lot less than $75,000 and
if she is not in the upper-rung, then there is
justification for not revealing it." - Larry Parr
(20 Feb 2006 08:27:34 -0800)
|