Home > Archive > Chess politics > February 2006 > Re: EB meeting and stuff





You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread. To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to this thread please [click here]

Author Re: EB meeting and stuff
Louis Blair

2006-02-26, 7:33 pm

Phil Innes wrote (Wed, 22 Feb 2006 23:07:23 GMT):
quote:

> Shall we assume this will be a similar to [Joel Channing's]
> previous offer to post his own analysis of the ChessCafe deal


_
Phil Innes does not quote any such offer. Here is
the sort of thing that I saw:
_
"the money difference wasn't great (hardly any
difference at current sales levels), and Malcolm
was going to continue to operate B & E
businesses that compete with USCF." - Bill
Goichberg (17 Jan 2006 00:17:32 -0800)
_
"I know what Malcom told me, that his offer was
not a minor improvement - and was in fact
$100,000 better. Maybe it was a bad phone line,
or that amount 'wasn't great' as Bill Goichberg
writes above.?" - Phil Innes (Tue, 17 Jan 2006
13:19:31 GMT)
_
"perhaps you would care to submit a clear and
detailed comparison of the two offers demonstrating,
while taking all factors into account (including
withheld funds), how we would have done so
much better with Malcolm." - Joel Channing
(17 Jan 2006 06:22:16 -0800)
_
"I thank you for the invitation, but this would add
insult to injury now that the stable door is locked
again for another 6 years." - Phil Innes (Tue,
17 Jan 2006 15:08:46 GMT)
_
"It's up to Phil to back up his allegation with facts."
- Joel Channing (17 Jan 2006 11:03:48 -0800)
_
"How come you asked me for Pein's bid?" - Phil
Innes (Tue, 17 Jan 2006 19:26:32 GMT)
_
"My interpretation of his request (which
Mr. Channing is free to correct) is: ... He knows
both bids. ... He would like to see your analysis
showing that the Chess4Less bid was $100,000
better" - Tom Martinak (18 Jan 2006 15:36:30 -0800)
_
"what more is there to understand about a
'guarantee' of $100,000 over another bid?" - Phil
Innes (Thu, 19 Jan 2006 13:08:24 GMT)
_
"Do I now understand you to claim that Malcolm's
bid was 'guaranteed' to be $100,000 better than
Hanon's?" - Joel Channing (19 Jan 2006
05:39:37 -0800)
_
"if I write something to which you respond, include
what I wrote - or what specific thing you wish
clarified." - Phil Innes (Thu, 19 Jan 2006
14:15:14 GMT)

Copyright 2003 - 2008 gamesreviews.net Software forum  PC Hardware reviews