| Paul Rubin 2006-02-26, 7:33 pm |
| "Chess One" <innes8@verizon.net> writes:
quote:
> The major point below has to do not with what has been claimed as
> 'personnel' matters, which should rightly be private, but with the position
> itself - what is its salary? If it is a managerial one, then the by-laws
> required her brother to resign, if not and the job comprises a technical
> postion of editing and content supply, why the fuss? Why should any board
> level activity be even in potential question about a technical activity?
Traditional political patronage and nepotism have not been limited to
managerial jobs. If a town's mayor hires his own nephew to sweep the
floors of City Hall, that's non-managerial but is still nepotism.
|