| vkarlamov@yahoo.com 2006-10-05, 7:47 pm |
|
likesforests@yahoo.com wrote:
quote:
> David Kane wrote:
>
>
> FIDE bears much responsibility for Toiletgate, but only a little for
> this. Topalov and Danailov are to blame for their wild accusations.
>
> However, FIDE could nip the problem in the bud as you suggested--the
> match contract allows them to assess Topalov a $25,000 unsportsmanlike
> conduct penalty. At the rate of $25,000 per unsubstantiated insult, how
> long would Topalov keep it up?
>
> "3.11.2: If a player... conducts himself in a manner contrary to the
> spirit of sportsmanship or the FIDE Code of Ethics, then he shall
> suffer the following penalty: 5% of his prize money shall be forfeited
> to the Organisers."
>
> Giving a win to Kramnik wouldn't be legal, per the match regulations.
>
Denying a man his officially allotted bathroom isn't legal per match
regulations either, but...
|