| Author |
USCF Membership Numbers
|
|
|
|
| RSHaas@aol.com 2005-08-27, 8:31 pm |
| Compared to a year ago it looks like the adult numbers are sort of
stabilizing but the kiddies are bailing out.
Old Haasie
| |
| FiFiela 2005-08-27, 8:31 pm |
| <<<Compared to a year ago it looks like the adult numbers are sort of
stabilizing but the kiddies are bailing out.>>>
Kiddies and parents don't make this decision. Organizers do.
Organizers have realized that not every scholastic section or every
scholastic tournament has to USCF rated to be a success.
| |
| Catalan 2005-08-27, 8:31 pm |
|
Less kiddies, more excess of revenues over expenditures. Likewise, the less
tournaments we run the less money we'll lose.
<RSHaas@aol.com> wrote in message
news:1125169285.298669.94080@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
quote:
> Compared to a year ago it looks like the adult numbers are sort of
> stabilizing but the kiddies are bailing out.
>
> Old Haasie
>
>
| |
| Kiddon 2005-08-29, 8:31 pm |
| Less scholastic players. An RSHaas dream.
kiddon
| |
| zdrakec 2005-08-29, 8:31 pm |
| It's very difficult for me, for one, to decide to renew if I don't have
access to an "economy" rate that does not include the magazine (which I
do not want). For the membership benefits, $49 still strikes me as too
high. I can certainly afford that per year, but I hate the feeling of
not getting fair value for my money.
The last time I renewed, I did so at the $39 "economy" (no magazine)
rate, and even then I felt that I was paying too much. Is there any
chance that the dues structure will be modified in the near future?
Cheers,
zdrakec
|
|
|
|