|
Home > Archive > Chess politics > August 2005 > Neil Brennen has opinion about chess???
You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread.
To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to
this thread please [click here]
| Author |
Neil Brennen has opinion about chess???
|
|
| Goran Tomic 2005-08-23, 8:31 pm |
| "The Histerian" <Spamscone@yahoo.com> wrote in message >
quote:
> So far this is the best answer.
>
Neil Brennen has opinion about chess???
It's incredible!
Are you competent to write or to express your opinion about chess? On which
base you send your comment because everybody knows that you merely know to
move the pieces (I pretty sure that you don't know correct move en passant).
You can ask your chief (but your supporter in cheating), Mr. Kingston and
ask his sincere answer: Are you competent to express the opinion on
question: What is chess?
If somebody would like to describe your and Mr. Kingston relation in life
and in cheating (or secret life) I would use comparison. In KGB hierarchy
minister's driver was KGB chief for the same minister. And you and your
chief Mr. Kingston. Have you the same relation like in example?
| |
| jamesrynd@aol.com 2005-08-23, 8:31 pm |
| >Neil Brennen has opinion about chess???
Yes he does, and he is more competent to give it than a raging lunatic
whose every post is a hemorrhagic disaster of words flowing everywhere,
many of which make no sense in the context in which they are presented.
Goran, get a torniquet for your keyboard. It is sorely needed.
quote:
>because everybody knows
When Sam Sloan is at his most pathological, he relies heavily on
"everybody knows" to lend some sort of credence to his postings. It
appears the manure does not fall far from the cow.
| |
| Sam Sloan 2005-08-23, 8:31 pm |
| On 23 Aug 2005 06:40:33 -0700, "jamesrynd@aol.com" <jamesrynd@aol.com>
wrote:
quote:
>When Sam Sloan is at his most pathological, he relies heavily on
>"everybody knows" to lend some sort of credence to his postings. It
>appears the manure does not fall far from the cow.
Would you kindly post an example of this?
I believe that you are misinformed.
Sam Sloan
| |
| jamesrynd@aol.com 2005-08-23, 8:31 pm |
| >Would you kindly post an example of this?
I just searched Google and found numerous examples. I suggest you also
do your own research.
| |
| Niemand 2005-08-23, 8:31 pm |
|
Sam Sloan wrote:
quote:
> On 23 Aug 2005 06:40:33 -0700, "jamesrynd@aol.com" <jamesrynd@aol.com>
> wrote:
>
> Would you kindly post an example of this?
> I believe that you are misinformed.
> Sam Sloan
A Google search of all groups for occurrences of "everybody knows" or
"everyone knows" in posts by Sam Sloan returned 328 hits. It appears
that Mr. Rynd is correctly informed.
| |
| Sam Sloan 2005-08-23, 8:31 pm |
| On 23 Aug 2005 09:48:21 -0700, "Niemand" <niemand@adelphia.net> wrote:
quote:
>
>Sam Sloan wrote:
>
> A Google search of all groups for occurrences of "everybody knows" or
>"everyone knows" in posts by Sam Sloan returned 328 hits. It appears
>that Mr. Rynd is correctly informed.
>
Not so fast. To prove his case you have to cite an example where I
wrote that "everybody knows" something and the underlying statement is
untrue.
Sam Sloan
| |
| Goran Tomic 2005-08-23, 8:31 pm |
| "Niemand" <niemand@adelphia.net> wrote in message
news:1124815701.376281.26440@g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Dear "Niemand, whoever you are,
I noted that your posts are not grounded. You wrote that I'm some singer (by
the way you missed several countries distance between me and that singer).
You include yourself in many discussion without any reason or argument.
Writing for writing? You would be more careful in your post because Mr Sam
Sloan easy check mated you. He check mated Bill Brock, (in real chess) Neil
Brennen, (in Wikipedia) and now you are check mated (on chess newsgroup).
I could suggest you to write some interesting and argumented chess mail
(without attack anybody) if you want to come back the credence in your
words. I believe that you are not bad, but obviously you are superficial.
Think about it.
| |
| Goran Tomic 2005-08-23, 8:31 pm |
| "Niemand" <niemand@adelphia.net> wrote in message
news:1124824838.468828.205550@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...
quote:
>
> "Goran's Music Career" thread was a joke at your expense.
>
>
> I believe that you know not your glutei from the distal end of your
> humerus.
>
Dear "Niemand", whoever you are,
It would be better that you write about chess. Mr Sloan CHECK MATED YOU! You
are DISGRACED BECAUSE YOU ARE CACHED LIKE SOME FOOL.
I advised you to write some posts which are based on some arguments. The
fact is that singer was not me, you missed several European countries in
your parody because you don't know enough fact about my country. Simply, you
have no any bigger knowledge about geography, history, chess. I perceived
that you like parody and FUN like Poland's Clown, Jerzy Circuk (Jerky from
the Circus). Are you his relatives from rich west country. But with same
statement: Chess is FUN!" like him.
Your behavior is similar to his. That's not compliment because each member
of this newsgroup recognized him as a Clown. So if you try, unsuccessfully
to write parody on chess newsgroup, instead to deal with chess themes,
you'll became clown like Poland's clown Jerzy Circuk (Jerky from the
Circus).
By the way it seems that you combined characteristic several people on this
newsgroup. There is one extremely stupid who is weak chess player and who
wrote on his web site that he shaked his leg when his opponent check mated
him. Second is mad man who think that he is reincarnation of some famous
player. Third thinks that he is historian but he is ordinary thief. Fourth
thinks that he is chess writer but he is ordinary drug's addicted, thief's
supporter and cheater. You have combined characteristics of these four fool:
clown, mad man and thief and drug addict.
I suggest to members of this chess newsgroup to give you the real name
regards above mentioned.
| |
| Niemand 2005-08-23, 8:31 pm |
|
Goran Tomic wrote:
quote:
> Dear "Niemand, whoever you are,
> I noted that your posts are not grounded. You wrote that I'm some singer (by
> the way you missed several countries distance between me and that singer).
Goran, most of what happens here whooshes right over your flat-top.
You missed the fact that the singer's country "Molvania" is completely
fictitious, that the music video is a parody, and that the whole
"Goran's Music Career" thread was a joke at your expense.
quote:
> I believe that you are not bad, but obviously you are superficial.
I believe that you know not your glutei from the distal end of your
humerus.
| |
| Niemand 2005-08-23, 8:31 pm |
|
Sam Sloan wrote:
quote:
> Not so fast. To prove his case you have to cite an example where I
> wrote that "everybody knows" something and the underlying statement is
> untrue.
Those terms are different from what Rynd proposed, but not difficult
to comply with. A few examples, from a few minutes' browse:
"The Democrats are actually Reds, as in Leftists or Commies.
Everybody knows that." -- Sam Sloan, 2 November 2004
"Everyone knows that Ralph Nader is out on the left-wing somewhere,
but I am shocked to learn that he would come out as an actual
Communist." -- 24 June 2004
"Just about everybody in New York knows this so they take their
16-year-old girlfriends to have New Jersey to have sex with them." --
25 September 2003
"Everybody knows that Gods do not have birthplaces. They fly around
in the sky somewhere and do not get born." -- 20 March 2002
"The real Alekhine was a famous Nazi, as everybody knows." -- 3 March
2002
And while the following does not fit the "everybody knows" category,
it certainly belongs in the "clouded crystal ball" department:
"The word is out: USCF plans to give the Books and Equipment business
to Malcolm Pein. The deal which was negotiated by Tim Hanke will be
inked at the Executive Board this weekend. This is, of course, a great
idea ..." -- 26 September 2003
| |
| Sam Sloan 2005-08-23, 8:31 pm |
| On 23 Aug 2005 15:23:36 -0700, "Niemand" <niemand@adelphia.net> wrote:
quote:
>
>Sam Sloan wrote:
>
> Those terms are different from what Rynd proposed, but not difficult
>to comply with. A few examples, from a few minutes' browse:
>
> "The Democrats are actually Reds, as in Leftists or Commies.
>Everybody knows that." -- Sam Sloan, 2 November 2004
> "Everyone knows that Ralph Nader is out on the left-wing somewhere,
>but I am shocked to learn that he would come out as an actual
>Communist." -- 24 June 2004
> "Just about everybody in New York knows this so they take their
>16-year-old girlfriends to have New Jersey to have sex with them." --
>25 September 2003
> "Everybody knows that Gods do not have birthplaces. They fly around
>in the sky somewhere and do not get born." -- 20 March 2002
> "The real Alekhine was a famous Nazi, as everybody knows." -- 3 March
>2002
Fine. Now, which of the above statements, in the context in which I
wrote them, are not true, and why?
quote:
> And while the following does not fit the "everybody knows" category,
>it certainly belongs in the "clouded crystal ball" department:
>
> "The word is out: USCF plans to give the Books and Equipment business
>to Malcolm Pein. The deal which was negotiated by Tim Hanke will be
>inked at the Executive Board this weekend. This is, of course, a great
>idea ..." -- 26 September 2003
This is a great example because it is entirely possible that because
of my posting above, the Executive Board did not make the deal with
Malcolm Pein and eventually made a much better deal with ChessCafe
instead.
Sam Sloan
| |
| Niemand 2005-08-24, 12:31 am |
|
Sam Sloan wrote:
quote:
> On 23 Aug 2005 15:23:36 -0700, "Niemand" <niemand@adelphia.net> wrote:
>
> Fine. Now, which of the above statements, in the context in which I
> wrote them, are not true, and why?
I rest my case.
| |
| Goran Tomic 2005-08-24, 3:31 am |
| "Niemand" <niemand@adelphia.net> wrote in message
news:1124843016.333428.274130@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com...[vbcol=seagreen]
Dear "Niemand", whoever you are,
Mr. Sloan gave you check, another check, and mate. So, your words don't
weight too much, on this newsgroup because that's second time you wrote
nonsenses in posts. You showed yourself like superficial, not too clever
person.
I suggest you to think before write, because you'll be constantly mated an
serve like box-bag for us.
Maybe the best solution for you to change the nickname and email address and
start with new name on this newsgroup. Because "Niemand" is brought shame
upon himself.
Best wishes in further discussions!
| |
|
|
| Goran Tomic 2005-08-24, 6:31 am |
| <politikalhack@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1124864503.881622.304590@g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
quote:
> Dear Goran
>
> Could you kindly check out the following links and give us your opinion
> of Mr. Sloan's comments?
>
> http://tinyurl.com/bqczh
>
> http://tinyurl.com/bj2rp
>
> http://tinyurl.com/aosmw
>
> Thanking you in advance....
>
Dear Bill,
I check out those posts, but I'm not interesting in those themes. I'm
interested in themes connected with chess. So, I rarely read posts from
another newsgroups.
| |
| jamesrynd@aol.com 2005-08-24, 8:32 pm |
| >So, your words don't weight too much, on this newsgroup because that's second time you >wrote nonsenses in posts.
If we concur that Niemand (a wonderful name) did write nonsense twice,
that puts him behind Goran by about 2,000 nonsense postings.
Or as we say in the U.S., one of many countries Goran loves to hate,
"That's like the pot calling the kettle black."
quote:
>Because "Niemand" is brought shame upon himself.
Ugh. Think Goran is bring shame on self first. Want crunchy frog? Taste
heap good.
|
| |
|
|