Home > Archive > Chess politics > June 2005 > Re: Parr Answers Kingston's Questions





You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread. To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to this thread please [click here]

Author Re: Parr Answers Kingston's Questions
Liam Too

2005-06-14, 8:31 pm

Chess One wrote:
quote:

> Natrolly. But am I pro-Stratfordian? And besides, name-calling is an
> understandable reaction to factual rebuke, but just as understadably, a
> weakness. Gaeltacht! Mark Houlsby is capable of as much intelligent
> contribution as any other writer here. These absurd distinctions among us
> are usually the result of a bowdlerized understanding based on what is often
> more evident than real.
>
> EVEN-CRISTEN: see Hamlet, v. i.
>
> In the whilke es forbodene us alle manere of
> lesynges, false consperacye and false sweryng,
> whare thurge oure evens-Cristyne may be lese
> thayre catelle.
>
> /MS. Lincoln A. i. 17, f. 215
>
> Cordially, Phil Innes


I thought you were pro-Stratfordian although I had my doubts. My second
guess would be that you are Oxfordian, in which case you would be
calling me illiterate as well.

About Natrol, I just posted it first to get reactions. It does not mean
that I endorse it though. However, I like caffiene, sugar, and others.

All the best, Lance

Copyright 2003 - 2009 gamesreviews.net Software forum  PC Hardware reviews