Home > Archive > Chess politics > June 2005 > Re: Parr Answers Kingston's Questions





You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread. To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to this thread please [click here]

Author Re: Parr Answers Kingston's Questions
Chess One

2005-06-14, 8:31 pm


"Liam Too" <liamtoo805@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1118757151.174434.169170@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
quote:

> Chess One wrote:
>
>
> I think the Trollsby is just telling you that you're pro-Stratfordian
> and he is anti.


Natrolly. But am I pro-Stratfordian? And besides, name-calling is an
understandable reaction to factual rebuke, but just as understadably, a
weakness. Gaeltacht! Mark Houlsby is capable of as much intelligent
contribution as any other writer here. These absurd distinctions among us
are usually the result of a bowdlerized understanding based on what is often
more evident than real.

EVEN-CRISTEN: see Hamlet, v. i.

In the whilke es forbodene us alle manere of
lesynges, false consperacye and false sweryng,
whare thurge oure evens-Cristyne may be lese
thayre catelle.

/MS. Lincoln A. i. 17, f. 215

Cordially, Phil Innes



Copyright 2003 - 2009 gamesreviews.net Software forum  PC Hardware reviews