| Chess One 2005-05-30, 8:32 pm |
| Taylor - if you snip people's posts of their context you will get a bad
reputation, and ignored by the big boppers, and wind up with only the
adoring hysterian. B. Erie 
I don't care anything about your spat with Evans - if you think your stuff
here proves anything about Keres/Botvinnik, or even suggests anything worth
pursuit, you have buried your sense in a heap of words.
My comments were in context to Larry Parr's note. Your snipping is bizarre
and a sort of desperation - since I was responding to quite another aspect
of things than your [and others] moto perpetuo here.
Phil
"Taylor Kingston" <tkingston@chittenden.com> wrote in message
news:1117244998.629837.86880@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Chess One wrote:
quote:
> O Larry, this is so true.
The hell it is, Phil, and you and Parr both know it. Parr is talking
through his hat (when he's not evading the subject altogether), Evans
is talking through his hat, Laurie doesn't even understand what we are
talking about, and you are swallowing it all hook, line, and sinker.
Four dates, Phil, four dates, plus associated facts:
Evans' article about Keres-Botvinnik: October 1996. Its mentions of
Botvinnik's 1991 interview, or of Whyld's 1962 conversation with Keres:
ZERO.
My article about Keres-Botvinnik: May 1998. Its mentions of
Botvinnik's interview, or of Whyld's conversation with Keres: ZERO.
Krabbé's publication of Botvinnik: December 1999.
Krabbé's publication of Whyld: June 2000.
Evans' claim that in 1998 I should have known about Whyld's and
Botvinnik's statements: September 2001.
I don't know what "so true" means to you, Phil, but where I come from
it generally corresponds to "empirically verifiable." Right now the
facts are not bearing you out.
|