| Randy Bauer 2005-04-28, 12:30 am |
| In article <1114653104.133499.70970@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>,
parrthenon@cs.com says...
quote:
>
>
> Randy Bauer has related several palpable lies on this forum, and
>applied a standard of conduct to a political opponent, Sam Sloan, that
>he does not apply to himself. George John has returned to discuss the
>subject, once again missing the point. I will reply elsewhere to him,
>noting for the fourth or fifth time, the precise point being so
>conveniently overlooked.
False. I met the election standards as explained to every candidate, and Sloan
did not.
quote:
>
> The Board resolution employed to cut Sam out of the magazine
>when his statement was already set and ready to go to press was an
>evident act of spite by the Board majority. It was not even
>politically useful. Just dumb and spiteful.
Rubish. Parr absolutely makes this up. Don Schultz has explained how HE
DECIDED that the Sloan piece would not run. My motion actually could have
helped Sloan get his piece published, if it was in any way applicable. It was
not. I've posted the motion on several occasions.
Parr will not address the motion, because it in no way "cut Sam out of the
magazine." Parr is lying, and it is the bold, bald-faced sort of lie.
Randy Bauer
|