Home > Archive > Chess politics > April 2005 > Re: Eade A Liar??





You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread. To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to this thread please [click here]

Author Re: Eade A Liar??
parrthenon@cs.com

2005-04-28, 12:30 am

WORSE THAN EVIL

<I've stated it before -- legal expenses are a cost of doing business.
I do not "fear"
them, but I recognize we will have them.> Randy Bauer

Jim Eade claims that I once called Sam Sloan "evil." I don't
deny making the statement because I have no recollection of it, let
alone what the context might have been.

Still, as is his wont, Jim does ask an unintentionally
interesting question. He wants to know that if I regard Sam as evil,
then what would that make me? Only one answer: worse than evil.
Which is to say super-duper evil or some such.

For those interested in Mr. Eade's intellectual incontinence, I
refer you to my "Bestiary Eadiensis," which I post every now and then.

Randy Bauer has related several palpable lies on this forum, and
applied a standard of conduct to a political opponent, Sam Sloan, that
he does not apply to himself. George John has returned to discuss the
subject, once again missing the point. I will reply elsewhere to him,
noting for the fourth or fifth time, the precise point being so
conveniently overlooked.

The Board resolution employed to cut Sam out of the magazine
when his statement was already set and ready to go to press was an
evident act of spite by the Board majority. It was not even
politically useful. Just dumb and spiteful.

If you return Randy Bauer to office, for he is plainly the most
energetic of this lot, you will be leaving the Federation open to
future legal actions because this guy comes from the culture of
government which wades through legal actions at taxpayer expense.
Unfortunately, the USCF cannot afford the ways of government.

Copyright 2003 - 2008 gamesreviews.net Software forum  PC Hardware reviews