| Taylor Kingston 2005-04-27, 7:45 pm |
|
parrthenon@cs.com wrote:
quote:
the[vbcol=seagreen]
> first Kasparov-Karpov match." -- Larry Parr, writing about Edward
Winter, 25 April 2005
quote:
> As I understand the matter, your argument amounts to the
idea
quote:
> that Mr. Campomanes used FIDE funds to mail out Mr. Winter's screed
in
quote:
> a spirit of a disinterested desire either that the chess world read a
> balanced account or, perhaps, in a Voltairean spirit that the chess
> world read an account that attacked him? Is that it?
Larry, do you actually understand the English language? Please review
what I have written in this thread. You will see that:
1. I make no claim about what Campomanes may have mailed to anyone.
2. I make no claim about why Campomanes may have mailed anything to
anyone.
3. I am not asking your opinion about what or why Campomanes may have
mailed anything to anyone.
The question is: in what document, if any, did Edward Winter "justify
Campo's stopping of the first Kasparov-Karpov match"? I doubt any such
thing exists.
To prove it does, you must do one simple thing: YOU MUST LOOK AT WHAT
WINTER HAS WRITTEN. I have done so. What you claim AIN'T THERE, as far
as I've seen. It looks like you're wrong. YOU MAY BE DECEIVING PEOPLE.
Surely, you don't want to do that, do you, Larry?
To make sure you understand, I will repeat these instructions, in
English, Spanish, German, and very rusty Esperanto:
YOU MUST READ WHAT WINTER HAS WRITTEN.
HAY QUE LEER LO QUE WINTER HA ESCRITO.
SIE MUSSEN LESEN, WAS WINTER GESCHRIEBEN HAT.
VI HAVAS JE LEGI KION WINTER ESTAS SCRIBINTA.
YOU MUST READ WHAT WINTER HAS WRITTEN.
Got it now? It's very simple: to determine what an author has
written, you must read what he has written. This technique works far
better than speculating about something you claim to have seen 20 years
ago. Try it.
|