Home > Archive > Chess politics > April 2005 > Re: Kingston still produces no evidence





You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread. To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to this thread please [click here]

Author Re: Kingston still produces no evidence
Sam Sloan

2005-04-26, 8:34 pm

On 26 Apr 2005 04:49:22 -0700, "Taylor Kingston"
<tkingston@chittenden.com> wrote:
quote:

>
>parrthenon@cs.com wrote:
>
> Larry, you've tried the Laurie Gambit before, and it didn't work.
>That line is still unsound. I present here my reply the last time you
>tried it, on 10 November 2004:
>
> "Larry, it is so much fun to yank your chain just a little bit, and
>watch you respond out of all proportion. It is almost as predictable
>as sunrise. Poke you with a teensy needle, and you'll go tilting at
>every windmill in sight and flail your vorpal sword at God knows how
>many frumious bandersnatches.
> "I can only laugh about you presenting Mr. Laurie's letter like it
>was the Zimmermann telegram. You seriously misrepresent our
>correspondence, though in this case I don't entirely blame you, since
>Mr. Laurie himself misrepresents it. I have rarely communicated with
>anyone so prone to misunderstanding and misinterpretation as he,
>whether willfully or carelessly I don't know." -- Taylor Kingston,
>11/10/04
>
> Now, where is your reply about Winter's alleged pro-Campomanes
>screed?


Is not it amazing that Taylor Kingston has now accused me, Larry Parr,
Mr. Laurie, Larry Evans and somebody named Lev of lies,
misrepresentations, falsehoods and so on and so forth all in the same
thread. Mr. Kingston would have you believe that only he and Edward
Winter are truth-tellers and the rest of us are all liars.

Meanwhile, Taylor Kingston refuses to proivide any evidence at all for
his claims, while peppering us with demands for evidence.

Sam Sloan
Copyright 2003 - 2008 gamesreviews.net Software forum  PC Hardware reviews