|
Home > Archive > Chess politics > April 2005 > Parr still produces no evidence
You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread.
To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to
this thread please [click here]
| Author |
Parr still produces no evidence
|
|
| Taylor Kingston 2005-04-25, 8:49 pm |
|
parrthenon@cs.com wrote:
quote:
> Taylor Kingston's technique is to keep asking new questions
> without answering old ones.
No, Larry, I am just asking the same question, now for the third
time. You said Edward Winter "wrote a long screed justifyingy [sic]
Campo's stopping of the first Kasparov-Karpov match." I've read almost
everything Winter's published on that subject, and I recall no such
thing. I'd like to see your evidence -- I think that's entirely fair
and proper.
If I were to say "Larry Evans wrote a long panegyric praising Kirsan
Ilyumzhinov's drug-testing policy" you'd sure as hell be on my case,
and you'd call me a liar if I couldn't prove it.
So, for the third time I ask, where is this "long screed justifying
Campo"? And please, no more evasion -- just produce your evidence, or
withdraw your claim.
| |
| Sam Sloan 2005-04-26, 12:41 am |
| On 25 Apr 2005 13:03:00 -0700, "Taylor Kingston"
<tkingston@chittenden.com> wrote:
quote:
>
>parrthenon@cs.com wrote:
>
> No, Larry, I am just asking the same question, now for the third
>time. You said Edward Winter "wrote a long screed justifyingy [sic]
>Campo's stopping of the first Kasparov-Karpov match." I've read almost
>everything Winter's published on that subject, and I recall no such
>thing. I'd like to see your evidence -- I think that's entirely fair
>and proper.
> If I were to say "Larry Evans wrote a long panegyric praising Kirsan
>Ilyumzhinov's drug-testing policy" you'd sure as hell be on my case,
>and you'd call me a liar if I couldn't prove it.
> So, for the third time I ask, where is this "long screed justifying
>Campo"? And please, no more evasion -- just produce your evidence, or
>withdraw your claim.
You are really an amazing piece of work as they say.
I just realized that over a period of many years, every time the name
of Edward Winter comes up, your name come up too, kind of like Clark
Kent and Superman, so the possibility that youy actually are Edward
Winter seems real.
For the past four years since 2001 you have been claiming that the
"ethics complaint" submitted by Edward Winter to FIDE was only two
pages long, yet you have never produced the document, which would
prove your case, if true.
Now, when Larry Parr made his statement yesterday that Edward Winter
wrote a long screed defending Campomanes, you have three times in the
past day demanded that he produce it, when he obviously would not have
it as it was written nearly 20 years ago. Yet, you have had four
years to produce the document to prove your claim against me and so
far you have faIled to do so.
Sam Sloan
|
| |
|
|