| Author |
Order to Show Cause and Affidavit in Support Have Been Posted
|
|
|
|
|
| i happened to pick up the latest copy of chess life today at the
library and imagine my suprise when i saw your photo in the list for
those running for the board of the uscf. the only thing missing (aside
from your profile as to why anyone should vote for you) is your inmate
number
Sam Sloan wrote:
quote:
> In my suit against members of the Board of the United States Chess
> Federation, the Order to Show Cause signed by Judge Gabriel Krausman
> and the Affidavit upon which it was granted have been posted at the
> following addresses:
>
> http://www.samsloan.com/krausman.pdf
>
> http://www.samsloan.com/marinello-appdiv.pdf
>
> The Board is required to respond by May 2, 2005.
>
> Sam Sloan
| |
| Falky foo 2005-04-24, 8:39 pm |
| what's an order toshow cause?
"Sam Sloan" <sloan@ishipress.com> wrote in message
news:4269736e.40822687@ca.news.verio.net...
quote:
> In my suit against members of the Board of the United States Chess
> Federation, the Order to Show Cause signed by Judge Gabriel Krausman
> and the Affidavit upon which it was granted have been posted at the
> following addresses:
>
> http://www.samsloan.com/krausman.pdf
>
> http://www.samsloan.com/marinello-appdiv.pdf
>
> The Board is required to respond by May 2, 2005.
>
> Sam Sloan
| |
| Falky foo 2005-04-25, 8:48 pm |
| does a court do it on its own or is it based on a motion from a party?
"Ray Gordon" <ray@cybersheet.com> wrote in message
news:JDrae.2188$yl6.1503148@twister.nyc.rr.com...
quote:
>
> Usually where the court asks someone to "show cause" why something (like a
> rule or regulation) doesn't apply to them, or why it does.
>
> The judge seems to want the USCF and/or its officers to explain themselves
> about something.
>
>
>
>
| |
| Spam Scone 2005-04-25, 8:49 pm |
|
Sam Sloan wrote:
quote:
> On 23 Apr 2005 13:43:52 -0700, "Wick" <WickD@comcast.net> wrote:
>
>
> Correct. And there is really no way to know what the four judges will
> do on the return date.
>
> Anything could happen.
>
> Incidentally, this case will be heard by a panel of four judges. If
> there is a tie by 2-2 then a fifth judge will be brought in to break
> the tie.
Imagining a scenario in which your crackpot lawsuit gets two judges to
vote in your favor is up there with your dreams of winning a seat on
the USCF Board. Ain't happening.
|
|
|
|