Home > Archive > Chess politics > April 2005 > Phil Innes, hate-monger





You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread. To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to this thread please [click here]

Author Phil Innes, hate-monger
Spam Scone

2005-04-11, 9:54 pm


Chess One wrote:
quote:

> with Nick citing Neil Brennen, who has written more hateful messages
> in these newsgroups than all others combined.


I could respond, but I'll let Philth's own words speak instead:

"The FBI will possibly in touch with you Brennen; for your own
expressions
seem to inexplicably engender abuse of others (not only myself). But
for
myself, I simply offer you the reflection that their are sharper
things than
wit.

"And if you XXXX with me and mine I will certainly make entirely sure
you
understand me without a shadow of a doubt. I am possibly over my
petit-fascist tolerancing line.

"Is this sufficiently clear?"

And:

"I am prepared to visit you to discuss our differences - what do you
say to
that? You can be up front about it here or simply wait until I show
up. If
you are at all alarmed at the potential threat of this message I
suggest you
contact the FBI."

And:

"Brennen- you fail to understand - you have booked yourself a date!

"You are the motherXXXXer who has continously excited these events,
based on
ad hominem attack, and who now cannot even remember their consequence,
preferring, as you do, the words of the rascist (and wanker) abuser,
as
apparently did St. Niro.

"Hang on for a month or two if you can, and eventually I'll make it
down and
visit you where you are and we'll get things entirely clear between
us.

"This is not, as you realise, the proverbial threat, but an absolutely
solid
promise of response to continuous provocation against myself and my
family.

"If you want to accelerate the encounter, come."

And here's Philth with his potty mouth on:

"I must remind any reader here that the person who writes this
describes
himself as an 'historian', but one who has apparently read XXXX-all."

"But still you XXXX with the subject, lol!!"

"Louis, this is boring beyond tears. I have wondered why you agitate on
the
unbidden behest of others, without the slightest attempt to even
identify
what the XXXX you are now objecting to"

"You are the motherXXXXer who has continously excited these events,"

"And if you XXXX with me and mine I will certainly make entirely sure
you
understand me without a shadow of a doubt."

"Will your sub-personality xganon-XXXX show up..."

"XXXX your condolences."

"if you cant write your own name to your posts why dont you XXXX off?"

"...XXXX that for a game of charlies!"

"Mala fides, malignum spernere vulgus!
(Bad faith and XXXX the people)"

"Neither of these people seem to me to be hyphenable-XXXX to me."

"If you want to XXXX with me lets sort it out. Come on... Lets do it.
Where
do you both live?"

"So interest from Americans has to go around, even avoid USCF [because
they
will XXXX it up],"

"'XXXX' Sam, why be coy when talking of freudian sluts"

"XXXX him! "

Mike Murray

2005-04-12, 3:56 am

On 11 Apr 2005 18:06:33 -0700, "Spam Scone" <Spamscone@yahoo.com>
wrote:
quote:

>Chess One wrote:
[vbcol=seagreen]
>I could respond, but I'll let Philth's own words speak instead:


<snip>

Still doesn't match Matt Nemmers' response to Rolf.
Heh, Heh, Heh.

Chess One

2005-04-12, 6:01 pm


"Spam Scone" <Spamscone@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1113267993.455829.294380@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...
quote:

>
> Chess One wrote:
>
> I could respond, but I'll let Philth's own words speak instead:
>
> "The FBI will possibly in touch with you Brennen; for your own
> expressions


This is the guy who likes to joke around the abuse of my family!

If you call the police about abuse phone calls to your house and supported
by incitements to hatred on the net, they refer you to the FBI office.

Brennen does not dispute that he abuses people, he resents it being
mentioned, as if it were okay.
quote:

> seem to inexplicably engender abuse of others (not only myself). But
> for
> myself, I simply offer you the reflection that their are sharper
> things than
> wit.


Doh!! A WRIT is sharper than wit.

But of course, like 500 other corrections the historian is not honest enough
to correct his garbage.

What I would like to know is why Neil Brennen likes to joke around with this
subject of the abuse of my family?

And for the record, if anyone does so within arm's reach, I would react, I
imagine, much like any other man.

Phil Innes
quote:

> "And if you XXXX with me and mine I will certainly make entirely sure
> you
> understand me without a shadow of a doubt. I am possibly over my
> petit-fascist tolerancing line.
>
> "Is this sufficiently clear?"
>
> And:
>
> "I am prepared to visit you to discuss our differences - what do you
> say to
> that? You can be up front about it here or simply wait until I show
> up. If
> you are at all alarmed at the potential threat of this message I
> suggest you
> contact the FBI."
>
> And:
>
> "Brennen- you fail to understand - you have booked yourself a date!
>
> "You are the motherXXXXer who has continously excited these events,
> based on
> ad hominem attack, and who now cannot even remember their consequence,
> preferring, as you do, the words of the rascist (and wanker) abuser,
> as
> apparently did St. Niro.
>
> "Hang on for a month or two if you can, and eventually I'll make it
> down and
> visit you where you are and we'll get things entirely clear between
> us.
>
> "This is not, as you realise, the proverbial threat, but an absolutely
> solid
> promise of response to continuous provocation against myself and my
> family.
>
> "If you want to accelerate the encounter, come."
>
> And here's Philth with his potty mouth on:
>
> "I must remind any reader here that the person who writes this
> describes
> himself as an 'historian', but one who has apparently read XXXX-all."
>
> "But still you XXXX with the subject, lol!!"
>
> "Louis, this is boring beyond tears. I have wondered why you agitate on
> the
> unbidden behest of others, without the slightest attempt to even
> identify
> what the XXXX you are now objecting to"
>
> "You are the motherXXXXer who has continously excited these events,"
>
> "And if you XXXX with me and mine I will certainly make entirely sure
> you
> understand me without a shadow of a doubt."
>
> "Will your sub-personality xganon-XXXX show up..."
>
> "XXXX your condolences."
>
> "if you cant write your own name to your posts why dont you XXXX off?"
>
> "...XXXX that for a game of charlies!"
>
> "Mala fides, malignum spernere vulgus!
> (Bad faith and XXXX the people)"
>
> "Neither of these people seem to me to be hyphenable-XXXX to me."
>
> "If you want to XXXX with me lets sort it out. Come on... Lets do it.
> Where
> do you both live?"
>
> "So interest from Americans has to go around, even avoid USCF [because
> they
> will XXXX it up],"
>
> "'XXXX' Sam, why be coy when talking of freudian sluts"
>
> "XXXX him! "
>



Spam Scone

2005-04-25, 8:49 pm


Chess One wrote:
quote:

>
> And for the record, if anyone does so within arm's reach, I would

react, I
quote:

> imagine, much like any other man.
>
> Phil Innes


Actually Phil, any other man would have alerted the authorities. Since
no one has ever contacted me, I suppose you made up the "told the FBI"
bit.

Copyright 2003 - 2008 gamesreviews.net Software forum  PC Hardware reviews