| Wlodzimierz Holsztynski (wlod) 2005-04-11, 5:59 pm |
| I am responding to another Boobaki's
propaganda touch.
Elsewhere, and already on several occasions,
I have pointed out the dirty, cheap sNicky's
propaganda tricks. E.g. consider regular people,
who support human rights and justice, hence also
the Israel's right to survive against the terror
and murders committed on Israelis. SNicky "Nicki"
calls such Human Rights supporters "supporters of Israel".
Years ago I was promoting and signed a petition
supporting Lithuanian independence, against Gorbachov
(Gorby tried to take advantage of the Gulf War,
I guess). Does it mean that I am "supporter of
Lithuania"? Well, I am supporter of all people
but soon after the mentioned petition I promoted and
signed another one. This time the undersigned asked
the Lithuanian government to stop the discrimination
against Polish minority in Lithuania.
People who signed such petitions were simply
supporting Human Rights. And the same is the case
of those who care about the Israelis and Palestinians.
Boobaki and Hans are NOT among them! They support
the terror and the murdering of Jews, with the resulting
fights and deaths and destruction, which harms both
Paklestinians and Israelis. The hipocrites like Boobaki
and Hans will not acknowledge this directly, but their
statements on rgc* speak about it loudly.
sNicky "Nick" Boobaki wrote:
quote:
> Simon ('chapman billy'), who's of Jewish heritage,
And so is Fischer. So what?
I didn't see Simon authorizing Boobaki to broadcast
Simon's ethnicity to the whole Internet world. Why
is racist Boobaki doing it? Again and again?
Boobaki is turning Simon into his "good Jew",
a Jewish equivalent of "Uncle Tom". If Simon
likes this it's his business but the Boobaki's
procedure is disgusting all the same.
quote:
> (Of course, I doubt that Simon would respect and like me
> if he suspected that I were anti-Semitic in any way.)
You make Simon look very naive. And you are shamelessly
showing how you use and abuse others.
quote:
> As I recall, Simon does not believe that the Reuters
> news agency is part of any anti-Semitic conspiracy.
Another instance of pig sNicky's dishonest tricks.
I have never written anything about any "conspiracy".
Now about Reuters' antisemitism. Reuters is vicious
and has a vast array of ugly tricks, much larger than
sNicky Boobaki. I am not going to instruct sNicky how
to be a more effective liar etc., hence I will not go
into Reuter's technique. Sorry, Snicky, for that, you
still have to be a moron-liar.
Some linguistic games are common to all media:
multi-murderers and the simple teenaged murderers sent
to kill by the big ones, are called "militants" --
not murderers, not criminals but "militants". That's
just one of the succeses of terrorists.
Media also play with the titles of articles but Reuters
is especially misleading this way. When Arabs get killed
by Israelis the titles are more than clear about it.
When Israelis are murdered then the casual reader would
never guess it from the titles. On many occasions it was
difficult to learn the truth even after reading the entire article.
Reuters was doing those tricks routinely, day in
and day out.
The ugly trickery, mentioned above, already is capable
of consistently creating wrongly negative impression
of Jews and Israel. But Reuters' ugliness doesn't stop
at this. The lack of sensitivity and respect for the dead,
for the victims, especially for the Israeli victims, is
inhuman, abhorrent. At the time, just before each consecutive
attempt at peace talks, when Israel was relaxing its
antiterrorist measures as a good will gesture, the terrorists
were using these occasions to committ their murders with extra
intensity. Then the whole Reuters' comment would be: this
may cause another delay of the peace talks under American
auspice. Reuters would not even indicate that the delay
or elemination of the talks altogether was caused by
the Palestinian terorists. Reuters would make it sound like
it just happens (who knows, may be Israel is guilty of this
too once again--could be the effect of Reuters writing on
naive readers, especially when they are already even only
somewhat prejudiced against Jews). Honest journalism would
be clean, would simply report the FACTS. Then readers would
feel the human tragedies. But Reuters is the **opposite** of
the honest journalism, at least when it comes to Israel and Jews.
Reuters was turning the human tragedies into its general
political DEHUMANIZED games.
Another Reuters' deviation from journalism, with the idea
of smearing Israel and the USA:
Reuters was in its reports (pseudo-reports) systematically
taking away Israel's dignity of an independent country.
Reuters was creating an impression that Israel has to
ask the USA all the time about each of its actions, that
the USA is all the time approving or disapproving the
Israel's actions, that supposedly such approval and sevitude
was guiding Israel. Reuters was achieving this way
two goals at the same time: (1) it was writing about Israel
in a higly offensive, denigrating way, and (2) it was enforcing
the common ignorant prejudice of the most primitive
antisemites and anti-Americans about supposed merger
(conspiracy) of Jews and the USA.
*****
The newspeech and ugly games by media, and especially
by the stinky Reuters is a huge topic but enough for now.
Wlod
|