Home > Archive > Chess politics > April 2005 > Re: Ratings experts: Please explain





You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread. To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to this thread please [click here]

Author Re: Ratings experts: Please explain
Mike Nolan

2005-04-11, 5:59 pm

"Angelo De Pa1ma" <adpspammersgotohell@tellurian.net> writes:
quote:

>Now my question is, what is the philosophic/mathematical basis for *not*
>normalizing average opponent ratings during a tournament as in my fantasy
>formula? Just curious.


I believe the non-linearity of the expected results function (a bell curve)
goes all the way back to the Elo formulative work, it's just that earlier
versions of the ratings software (prior to 2000) tended to use a linear
approximation of the formula because it was easier to program.

Having spent several weeks in January making sure the new programming came
up with the same results as the old programming, the linear approxmation
has to have been much easier to program.

But as I said before, if you have concerns about the formula, take them
up with the Ratings Committee. I just wrote the program, not the formula.
--
Mike Nolan


Copyright 2003 - 2009 gamesreviews.net Software forum  PC Hardware reviews